START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,732,861 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Natural Gas Companies Benefit from the Status Quo

Natural Gas Companies Benefit from the Status Quo

There won’t be any national or international movement on climate policy for the rest of this year, at the very least. And while Washington waits to act on climate change, at least one group is benefiting. The natural gas industry is flourishing, despite reports that its practices lead to flammable tap water, poisoned aquifers, and multiple health problems.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), who is emerging as a new leader in Congress on these issues, said this week that a comprehensive climate bill had little chance of passing through the Senate in the next two years. Furthermore, the expectations for the next round of international climate negotiations, to be held this winter in Cancun, are abysmally low, as Inter Press Service reports.

Say no to the status quo

In the past, the volatility of gas prices limited the industry’s share of the energy market, but now, hydrofracking techniques guarantee a more steady supply, meaning steadier prices. It helps that green leaders have talked up natural gas as a clean energy source.

Natural gas does emit less carbon than coal, but the process of extracting it through hydrofracking — pushing chemical-laden water into the ground to create cracks and allow gas to bubble up to the surface — has serious environmental impacts.

Sandra Steingraber, in Orion Magazine, calls the rise of hydrofracking “the environmental issue of our time.” Environmentalists based support for natural gas production on the premise that natural gas would serve as a “bridge fuel” while renewable energy infrastructure grew enough to provide much of the country’s fuel needs. But without stronger support from Washington for renewables, that bridge may never reach the other side.

The high cost of hydrofracking

The alliance between the environmental movement and the natural gas industry has always been uneasy. Both sides regard each other suspiciously. As evidence mounts that hydrofracking pollutes air and water, posing health risks, the worries of local environmentalists are beginning to outweigh the advantages of gas.

“Fracking is linked to every part of the environmental crisis — from radiation exposure to habitat loss — and contravenes every principle of environmental thinking,” Steingraber writes in Orion. “It’s the tornado on the horizon that is poised to wreck ongoing efforts to create green economies, local agriculture, investments in renewable energy, and the ability to ride your bike along country roads.”

On the ground, fracking is frightening, as Kate Sinding, an attorney with the National Resources Defense Council told Change.org’s Jess Leber.

“Drinking water wells are being contaminated, livestock are being poisoned, explosions are occurring when methane has gotten backed up inside a drinking water well after the underground water supply became contaminated,” Sinding said.

Facing down gas companies

Steingraber argues that these effects — the true impact of natural gas extraction — should be factored into the cost of gas and that the public health implications deserve the benefit of the doubt. Even weighed against a lower level of carbon emissions, these considerations make gas look much more like a bridge to nowhere.

In New York, the state government is trying to reign in the industry, Sinding says. “Culturally and politically, I think New Yorkers may be more skeptical about a new heavy industry coming in,” she told Leber. While the promise of jobs is as tempting in New York as it is in places like Pennsylvania and Wyoming that had rushed ahead with fracking, New Yorkers are seeing, Sinding says, that “now residents still face the same problems as they did before, but now, in addition, also can’t drink their water.”

Outside of New York, there are other initiatives that could slow the momentum behind fracking.  The Nation’s Peter Rothberg suggests supporting United for Action, a group that’s fighting the practice, or pushing congressional reps to support the FRAC Act, which would increase regulation of the fracking process. (FRAC stands for Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals.)

Fracking and flammable tap water

Fracking can pollute water supplies, as the flammable tap water in fracking areas demonstrates. But the process also demands huge volumes of water as a matter of course. Fracking companies mix chemicals into the water and use it to keep the cracks in the earth open in order to access gas.

But fracking isn’t the only water-guzzling energy process. Keith Schneider, speaking for a network of journalists and scientists called Circle of Blue, told Inter Press Service that “the competition for water at every stage of the mining, processing, production, shipping and use of energy is growing more fierce, more complex and much more difficult to resolve.”

More than 200 billion gallons of water go to cooling power plants each day. Harvesting solar energy also demands huge quantities of water.

As water resources grow scarcer, this demand could drive huge conflicts, both internationally, and in the United States. As Making Contact reports, in Michigan, lawmakers are weighing the idea of putting water resources into a public trust, but already the ecological arguments for that idea and the economic arguments against it are clashing. Imagine how much harder it will be to divvy up water if energy companies got involved.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. Visit the Mulch for a complete list of articles on environmental issues, or follow us on Twitter


Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

photo credit: thanks to danielfoster437 via flickr
by Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium Blogger

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

20 comments

+ add your own
3:26AM PST on Nov 18, 2010

I believe water used for cooling electric generating plants is heated but not otherwise damaged. If we would go for combined heat and power, the heat in that hot cooling water could be made good use of and the water would cool down allowing it to be reused for cooling. It should be possible to reuse the same water dozens of times. The ground loop of ground source heat pump heating/cooling systems should be a good place to store cooling water while waiting for it to cool down enough to reuse for cooling. Also we should be making good use of both all our sewage and all our agricultural waste (mostly cow, pig, and chicken manure) to generate methane and make good use of that methane. It won't add up to as much as what the natural gas industry can extract with fracking, but it would at least make good use of something that if neglected would generate lots of greenhouse gas.

8:21AM PDT on Oct 7, 2010

Fracking is unsafe for the environment. I concur with others who have read about the results elsewhere, as have I.

2:36AM PDT on Sep 28, 2010

Thanks.

5:45PM PDT on Sep 27, 2010

How many "THE environmental issue[s] of our time" are there going to be? I'd really like to keep a scorecard. Will one Excel spreadsheet be enough?

This looks like just another "let's all freeze in the dark" mantra.

12:09PM PDT on Sep 26, 2010

The bottom line is money talks, the enviroment looses.

7:01AM PDT on Sep 26, 2010

Corporations always find a way to benefit. The strange bit about it is that they are allowed to get away with it.

4:18AM PDT on Sep 26, 2010

It's easy to see what happened here. The gas companies dangled large amounts of cash for leases and royalties in front of poor farmers and country folk. The gas companies told us time and time again that fracking is safe and we had nothing to worry about. Now that this mess has started, these poor people can do nothing since they signed their rights away. I talk to many people who are sorry they ever signed their leases. Even visitors to my area are afraid to drink our tap water. Even landowners like me can do nothing about our neighbors who allowed this raping of the environment to happen. Such a shame and I am sorry I ever picked this once beautiful rural area to live in.

6:32PM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

Sorry my comment appeared twice. I'm not sure what happened to cause it to do that but hopefully it will not happen again.

6:31PM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

Sorry my comment appeared twice. I'm not sure what happened to cause it to do that but hopefully it will not happen again.

6:28PM PDT on Sep 25, 2010

I have been reading about fracking in several magazines and newsletters for some time now. If I remember correctly, some of the extraction sites are as close as 30 - 50 yards from homes. In some areas bottled water is being trucked in because so many wells have become contaminated that the people cannot drink it, use it for toothbrushing and, in some cases, bathe in it. Why this has not been stopped is beyond me. Guess this is going to be another one of those problems where the federal government is going to have to step in. People complain about big government yet local governments, and sometimes state governments, can't or won't do anything about the problem.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

I think this is more for PR than to really intend for them to become the heads of military units, etc.…

Thanks for sharing. Good job NYC.

Continued: I am NOT willing to give up on ounce of freedom so that people like you can live under…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.