START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,355,245 people care about Politics

Who’s Got the Mojo to Win in 2016?

Who’s Got the Mojo to Win in 2016?
  • 1 of 5

With the 2012 election now in the rear-view mirror, it’s time for politicos to move on to the next important thing. No, not the fiscal cliff, or comprehensive immigration reform, or the end of the Afghan War — it’s time to look at who’s got the mojo for the 2016 presidential election!

Here’s a quick look at the power rankings for the Democrats and Republicans who could succeed President Barack Obama, and a few who really probably couldn’t. Please note: these power rankings are based on a thoroughly scientific analysis of gut feel, conventional wisdom and a smattering of too-early-to-be-meaningful polling. Please, no wagering.

DEMOCRATS

1. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Clinton has not indicated that she plans to run for president in 2016, and there are certainly reasons to think she won’t. For one thing, she’ll be 69 years old, old enough that nobody could begrudge her a happy, healthy retirement from public service. For another, Clinton has been praised for her work as Secretary of State; if she retires after four years as the nation’s top diplomat, few would question her place in history — a First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State of consequence.

Still, there’s also every reason to think that Clinton could make a run — and if so, every reason to think she could win. While Clinton will turn 69 before election day in 2016, that’s still slightly younger than President Ronald Reagan was when he was first elected. Clinton has a powerful network of donors dating back to her husband’s time in office. Moreover, her loyalty to Obama in 2008 after a bitter, divisive primary won over many who backed the current president, and her husband’s campaigning for Obama in 2012 won over many more. If Hillary Clinton runs, many Obama supporters would back her with the idea that it was simply her due.

Indeed, Hillary Clinton is in an extremely strong position if she chooses to run in 2016. It’s hard to imagine anyone beating her. Of course, that’s what people were saying in late 2004, and we all know what happened. There are no guarantees. But if Hillary Clinton decides to run again, it’s her race to lose.

2. Vice President Joe Biden

It’s rare that a sitting vice president wouldn’t be at the top of a list of candidates. The fact that Biden is second to Clinton is less a reflection of Biden’s weakness than Clinton’s strength; clearly, if Hillary Clinton chooses not to run, Joe Biden would be in a very strong position to win his party’s nomination.

Biden has hinted that he is interested in running in 2016, but his age could be a consideration. Biden will be 73 on election day, and would turn 74 before being inaugurated, which would make him the oldest person ever to win a presidential election, even older than Reagan when he won his second term.

Still, as Biden demonstrated in his debate with Paul Ryan, he’s as sharp as he’s ever been. While Biden is certainly gaffe-prone, he clearly has a strong command of the issues.

If Clinton doesn’t run and Biden does, it’s hard not to think of him as the front-runner. Of course, Biden may well decide that at 74, it’s time to enjoy his grandchildren and retire after 46 years in public service.

 

 

3. Sen.-elect Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Warren is in the position that Barack Obama was in eight years ago – a popular, respected leader who has just been elected to the Senate, who has a good rapport with the base, and who is already being touted for higher office.

Unlike Obama, however, Warren’s decision isn’t whether to run as a freshman Senator or to wait until she’s more experienced. Warren is 63 years old, and will be 67 in 2016. If she doesn’t run in the next cycle, she probably never runs for President.

Of course, there are worse fates than to be a Democratic senator from Massachusetts, and it’s entirely possible that Warren could decide that she’s already in a strong position to improve the way our nation’s financial system works. Nobody could blame her if she decided to try to stay in the Senate for the next 18 years.

If she does decide to seek the presidency, she’d certainly start with a strong base of support, especially among Democrats who want to see more done to address wealth inequality. I doubt she runs if Clinton is in the race, but if the Secretary of State decides to stay retired, I would expect Warren to take a shot — especially since losing in the primary wouldn’t keep her from running for reelection in 2018.

 

4. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo

Andrew Cuomo has been named as a likely candidate for the presidency, and it’s easy to imagine him throwing his hat in the ring. The son of the respected Gov. Mario Cuomo, Andrew also served in the Clinton cabinet, as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

Cuomo polls reasonably well, in no small part because he comes with inherited name recognition. He also gets deserved plaudits for shepherding same-sex marriage through the legislature and into law. That’s no small accomplishment, and deserving of respect.

Cuomo does, however, have an Achilles heel. As Governor, he has angered liberal New Yorkers by hacking and slashing at the budget, cutting taxes on the rich while cutting services for the poor. Cuomo has also been far from friendly to organized labor during his time in office.

To say this puts him out of step with the Democratic Party of today is an understatement. Cuomo’s DLC governance style is not well-known outside of New York, but then, he hasn’t run for president yet. If he does throw his hat in the ring, it’s beyond likely that he will be pounded by opponents — with his support plummeting as his positions become better-known.

There’s one more thing auguring against a Cuomo run — the candidate at the top of the power rankings. Hillary Clinton was a senator from New York. It’s hard to imagine Cuomo being viable if most New York politicians are backing the Secretary of State.

 

5. Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley

O’Malley has all-but-announced for the 2016 race, and certainly has a strong record to run on. O’Malley has been unabashedly liberal, pushing ballot initiatives for same-sex marriage and a version of the DREAM Act, both of which passed.

O’Malley did not wow anyone with his speech at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, but neither did he make any major mistakes. Moreover, his record of accomplishment in a blue, diverse state is indicative of a candidate who could lead the emerging Democratic majority.

For O’Malley, much will depend on his ability to lay the groundwork over the next two or three years. He cannot run for reelection in 2014, so he will have a full two years free to camp out in Iowa and New Hampshire. While it’s passing unlikely that O’Malley would beat Clinton or Biden, he could certainly be competitive among the next tier of candidates.

  • 1 of 5

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

112 comments

+ add your own
1:21PM PDT on Mar 11, 2014

Hillary in 2016!!!!!

6:46PM PST on Jan 25, 2013

DLC? Maybe you all know what it stands for, but after the second time you tossed it around I had to do a web search to figure out that you were probably talking about the centrist Democratic Leadership Council in reference to Cuomo. But I'm still not sure. Did you mean Cuomo's "downloadable content" (by far the most hits) style of governance? Disability Law Center? Dragonlance Chronicles? Democrats for the Leisure Class? All go by the acronym DLC. Back in the day, we followed the AP Stylebook. One cardinal rule: always spell out an organization on first reference, and save the acronym for subsequent uses. You take away from the flow of a good piece when you send your reader off to explore the web.

4:53AM PST on Jan 25, 2013

None are suitable.

5:30AM PST on Nov 28, 2012

Joe is a joke....literally.
Hilary is a COWard. She takes responsibility for the failure of Benghazi and then disappears, avoiding any questions before congress about that failure. Why didn't SHE make the rounds on news shows explaining Benghazi instead of Rice, who obama admitted knew squat about it???? Powell and Condi Rice were pretty busy people, yet THEY found time to do news programs to answer for and explain policies and actions.
Warren is another ideological professor ( much like obama) who knows nothing about the real world, the free market economy and job creation.

2:34PM PST on Nov 25, 2012

This is the clearest, most comprehensive list of possible 2016 candidates I've ever seen. It's bookmarked on my computer- job well done!

7:00PM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I would have voted for Hilary Clinton in 2008 if she had won the Democratic nomination then. I would vote for her in 2016. She is clearly the most qualified candidate for the job. I can't believe any person with a brain in their head would vote for Palin. But then again, there are candidates in the Senate who don't believe in "science" who somehow were voted in.

I wouldn't vote for Joe Biden because he was wishy washy about what to do with Bin Laden. He wanted to" wait and see". That is no way to deal with a sworn enemy of the U.S.. Thank God President Obama stepped up to the plate and declared him "wanted dead or alive no matter what" .

11:06AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I think that Hillary should run. She would at least be respected by the other countries we deal with and she knows what the job entails.

9:03AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I'll be watching Elzabeth Warren these next few years, hoping someone of her brains and ethics becomes a shining star in the Senate, connecting with people emotionally and through her ability to get the right things done.

For all Clinton's talents, she leaves me cold as a person, and I know I'm not the only one. I have warmer feelings for Sherrod Brown and Biden, but he's gaffe-prone.

12:15AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

thanks,,,,

10:21PM PST on Nov 18, 2012

Just thought if America elected a woman president, would her husband be referred to as "The Fist man?" lol!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.