START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,443,001 people care about Women's Rights

Wikipedia Says Women Aren’t ‘American Novelists’

Wikipedia Says Women Aren’t ‘American Novelists’

Wikipedia is arguably crowdsourcing’s greatest triumph. The site can be edited by anyone, which is both a blessing or a curse, but it has created the largest encyclopedia in human history, covering vastly more territory than any company or organization possibly could.

Because anyone can edit Wikipedia, the site is a terrific representation of society. Unfortunately, however, society is imperfect. So today’s news that the site was listing American novelists who were women as “American Women Novelists,” while male novelists showed up as “American Novelists,” is as unsurprising as it is dispiriting.

In some cases, the changes appeared to be deliberate, More often, however, it seems that women novelists were categorized as “Women Novelists” simply because of oversight — people simply didn’t put them in the more-generic category.

So that’s good — there’s no Wikipedia conspiracy to keep women down, right? Well, yes and no. Unfortunately, the subtle sexism displayed by Wikipedia’s crowdsourced editing is evidence of a more serious, endemic problem, not with Wikipedians, but with society itself.

It is hardly news that we tend to think of the “default” human as male — not to mention cisgender, straight, white and able-bodied. That tendency to view the privileged as the default while viewing non-privileged as the “other” is at the heart of bigotry. It’s not a surprise that Wikipedia would fall victim to the sexism of othering; indeed, it would be surprising if it didn’t.

The good news — and it is good news — is that calling attention to othering allows people of good conscience to push back against it. As writer Liz Henry notes, the news that Wikipedia was pushing female writers into their own, separate category has led people to add “American Novelist” to the list of categories for a number of female American novelists, including Harper Lee and Donna Tartt. Furthermore, Wikipedia editors are debating making “American Women Novelists” and “American Men Novelists” sub-categories of “American Novelists,” which would automatically make members of the sub-groups members of the larger group (although this would leave out those who do not identify simply as male or female).

The othering of American women novelists is not Wikipedia’s problem, but society’s. The good news is that Wikipedia is moving to address the problem. Only by being open about the problem of othering — by pointing it out when it comes to light — can we make things better. If we do, continually, we can slowly-but-surely reach a point where Wikipedia is no longer sexist — just like the egalitarian society that contributes to it.


Related Stories

Wikipedia in Russia Shuts Down to Protest Online Censorship

Palin’s Revisionist Paul Revere History Stokes Wikipedia Wrassle

3 Ways to Tell Girls How Cool Science Is


Read more: , ,

Image Credit: nojhan

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:42PM PDT on Jul 22, 2013

Thank you for the article and all the numerous comments and discussions from the members. I have never used Wikipedia, but it does sound interesting.

8:11AM PDT on Jun 13, 2013

Wikipedia has many flaws but is still a good tool

1:54AM PDT on May 8, 2013


12:07AM PDT on May 4, 2013

You're right, and it's always where I start. I got my feet wet with genealogy back when postage was 6¢ so have developed a feel for what to trust and aim for at least 3 sources of information. The first news stories about Jack Andraka said he began with Google and Wikipedia -- he's the high school student who won $75,000 for developing a new, better and cheaper test for discovering pancreatic cancer. That's good enough for me.

3:03AM PDT on May 3, 2013

Wikipedia is ONLY for a start, nothing more.............

7:30PM PDT on May 2, 2013

i couldn't care less about Wikipedia's opinion. it's Wikipedia. next.

3:50PM PDT on May 2, 2013

Well, if they put American Men Authors and American Female Authors as subcategories just put those who identify as anything else directly under American Authors until there are enough who use the same term in their own subcategory, right?

10:37AM PDT on May 2, 2013


3:02AM PDT on May 2, 2013

Louisa May Alcott, Harriet Beecher Stowe-- it's not hard to think of women who wrote defining American novels.

10:13AM PDT on Apr 30, 2013

Does view the privileged as the default and the non-privileged as the other mean that being a billionaire is the default and making anything less than the national median income is "the other"?

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Why talk about the deficit when there are far more important things to talk about - like women's reproductive…

Who knew!!! good information.

Idont want to dress my cats !!

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!