START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,411,978 people care about Civil Rights

Women Of Wal-Mart Re-File Discrimination Claims

Women Of Wal-Mart Re-File Discrimination Claims

Last June the Supreme Court handed Wal-Mart a victory when it dismissed the historic class action gender discrimination lawsuit Dukes v. Wal-Mart on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked a “common question of law or fact” to bind their allegations that Wal-Mart systematically discriminated against women in pay and hiring decisions. The decision was seen as a setback not just for the women of Wal-Mart, but for civil rights litigants battling pernicious, diffuse discrimination instead of the easier to prove overt discrimination.

After the 5-4 decision the plaintiffs vowed they would be back. And they are. Last week plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit that narrows the class from all of the women who work or have worked at Wal-Mart and Sam’s Clubs stores to those in the retailer’s California regions–taking the class from an estimated 1.5 million to 90,000 women.

Plaintiffs will likely file several more lawsuits coming as they are forced to litigate groups of cases against Wal-Mart as a result of the Dukes decision.

The decision last summer never reached the merits of plaintiffs’ claims, so the issue of whether or not the world’s largest retailer routinely discriminated against women remains an open one. For the past thirteen years Wal-Mart has tried to get the case thrown out on procedural grounds, but the plaintiffs refuse to go away. Justice is still a ways off for these women, but kudos to them for not backing down.

Related Stories:

Wal-Mart Decision Begs For Paycheck Fairness Act

Wal-Mart’s Gender Washing

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from monochrome via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:13AM PDT on Mar 17, 2013

Wal-Mart should not bully people. They should be nice to women and their customers.

4:28AM PDT on Mar 15, 2013

Here's a solution to the WalMart 'problem' -- since Wal Mart employees are the greatest users by percentage of federally funded programs like food stamps and Medicaid because of the very low wages and less than full-time hours per week that is the WalMart standard (They don't have to offer health insurance to part-time employees), why not just have the WalMart Corporation pay a usage tax equal to the amount spent of our tax dollars on those programs to help their employees. This would amount to approximately $3.2 billion dollars annually.
Of course, to not spend that amount, they could switch to all full-time employees, with health care, and a living wage -- approximately $2.1 billion annually...

4:54AM PDT on Nov 3, 2011

Thanks for the article.

1:39AM PDT on Nov 2, 2011

I have never, nor will ever, enter that store!!!

5:04PM PDT on Nov 1, 2011

WalMart is not cheap. To start with, they destroy all the small businesses everywhere they build a store. That destroys the local economy and puts people on unemployment. I never shop there. I hope these women win their lawsuit against WalMart.

5:02PM PDT on Nov 1, 2011

Wal-Mart Sucks. I hope the women keep going with this law suite.

11:12AM PDT on Nov 1, 2011

More power to the Women of Walmart!
We even have to fight the Supreme Court for our civil rights!

6:57AM PDT on Nov 1, 2011

I am glad they are not giving up.

11:06PM PDT on Oct 31, 2011

I hope they win

7:44PM PDT on Oct 31, 2011

i hope these brave women succeed

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!