But now lets’ factor in Bob and Johns overall driving needs. John commutes to and from work, drives to the store, and on the weekends, puts his bike on the back of the Prius and drives to the mountains to go riding. He averages about 200 miles per week. Bob on the other hand rides his bike to work, heads to the store and back by walking or taking the bike, and only drives his car on the weekends to visit friends and occasionally pick up larger supplies that he needs. He drives about 50 miles a week, or 25 percent of what Bob drives.
So in the end equation, Bob is actually doing more to limit his dependence on fossil fuels (when it comes to transportation) than John is, even though it doesn’t look like it by checking out their driveways. Since a gallon of fuel burned creates the same need for replacement and puts out the same CO2 no matter how it is burned, the truly important number we should be talking about when it comes to transportation is how much you are burning overall, not how much you are burning per trip.
The reason I like this idea, and I don’t want to sound like I’m putting Prius owners down because I am not, is that it allows us to equate people on equal footing. The person with the long commute and enough money to buy a new car can do so and decrease their fuel consumption footprint. But you can do the same thing by changing your lifestyle, and in many ways it’s better on a lot of levels, and it won’t cost you a dime. Consider also that by driving less your car will last longer, saving you even more money, and will not need to be replaced nearly as readily.
And no matter what your interests or beliefs are, this makes sense. Are you worried about Global Climate Change? Drop your TGB. Think we need to get off of foreign oil? Cut your TGB in half. Tired of paying too much at the pump? Well you get the idea. The list goes on and on as I doubt very few people these days, besides the execs at BP, would try to convince us that burning more gas is a good thing.
So there you have it. TGB. Anyone in on this?