START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Proposition 37 to Enforce GMO Labeling

Proposition 37 to Enforce GMO Labeling

By Sarah Shultz for Diets in Review

The debate on genetically engineered foods is becoming more vocal as organizers in California have successfully lobbied to put the issue to a vote. On November 6, Proposition 37 will be on the ballots in California, asking citizens whether or not to require every retail food manufactured with genetically modified organisms to be labeled as such. The law would go into effect July 2014, and would likely spur other states to come up with their own versions.

A genetically modified organism, or GMO, is produced through a complex process of biotechnology. Scientists artificially change a plant’s DNA in order to produce a bigger, hardier, or more pest-resistant organism. Agriculturists hail this as a way to feed the growing population and provide better yields for farmers. Proponents of Proposition 37, however, claim that genetically modified foods have not been adequately tested and pose serious health threats.

“[This] is part of a growing national food movement that demands transparency. People want to know where food comes from and how it is grown. More than 40 other countries require labeling–including all of Europe, China, Japan and beginning in January, India. The U.S. is one of the few industrialized countries that doesn’t,” said Lori Sinsley, Media Director for the California Right to Know Campaign.

The campaign is up against some big businesses with deep pockets for ad campaigns, including many agriculture interests, biotech companies like Monsanto, and food manufacturers such as Kellogg’s. In spite of that, its ranks have been growing, gathering nearly one million signatures on a petition for the ballot measure. And some have even switched sides on the issue, including former Monsanto employee, Kirk Azevedo.

Azevedo said in an interview with Food Nation Radio Network that he remembers being out in a cotton field with a PhD researcher and arguing with him, saying there’s no difference between Roundup ready cotton (bred for herbicide resistance) and traditionally-bred cotton. The researcher told him that there was a big difference between the two as other proteins were being introduced into the cotton as a byproduct of the genetic engineering process.

“That’s when I became concerned, because at the same time I had been studying protein diseases, like prion disease and mad cow disease, and I knew that proteins could be toxic. A whole new classification of diseases were just on the horizon,” Azevedo said.

He told the other researcher that the cotton should be destroyed because of the possibility for these protein diseases, and the researcher told him that it would not. Instead, the cotton would be used in cattle feed, as it was the standard practice for the company.

Azevedo did not demonize the company, but said, “In reality, we did not know the questions to ask as far as how is this different and how we should test these products.”

The issue is not simple, as it would make a huge impact on the food industry and probably make a big change in what products consumers buy. Polls have shown that around 90 percent of Americans would be in favor of labeling. Opponents of the initiative say this is an unfair scare tactic against FDA-approved foods. Time will tell whether or not foods will soon be sporting the new labels.

RELATED ARTICLES:
True Food Shopper’s Guide: Your Guide to Non-GMO Foods
10 Reasons Why GM Food is Bad
Top 5 GMO Foods to Watch Out For

Read more: Environment, Food, Global Healing, Green, News & Issues, , ,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love

31 comments

+ add your own
5:55PM PDT on Aug 8, 2012

Hope it goes international, we all need to know what we eat

8:15PM PDT on Jul 26, 2012

I think extra genes are an ingrediant and people should have the right to know everything added or used to make their foods so they can decide for themselves.

10:40PM PDT on Jul 25, 2012

We have the right to accept or reject gmo foods--therefore, they should, by law, be labeled.
If the senate feels we need to be "kept in the dark" about our food, as well as every other blessed thing they do and vote on (and accept kickbacks for), the senate needs to go!

9:17PM PDT on Jul 24, 2012

We need to know so we can choose our own poison!

8:57AM PDT on Jul 24, 2012

may this proposition prevail

2:29AM PDT on Jul 24, 2012

I find it hard to believe it isn't already labelled. This and palm oil

12:21AM PDT on Jul 24, 2012

It is about time and only makes sense that we have the right to know what is in our food, never understood why this was even an issue. GMO is bad and I want to know if the food I am eating is a GMO product.

12:21AM PDT on Jul 24, 2012

We all have a right to know.

9:34PM PDT on Jul 23, 2012

We have the right as americans to know what we are eating.

8:37PM PDT on Jul 23, 2012

GMOs must be labeled.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

I understand many of the detractors. At the same time, it's a great tool for your pet to use while …

I can't stand to see anymore animal abuse. I signed the petition and will not eat the pizza.

I built a light stand for sprouting garden vegetables, and in the fall I bring in my white sage and …

I too thought this article was about leaving the tellie on when not at home. I personally don't thin…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.