The End of the Pyramid Scheme: The Rise of MyPlate

Back in the mid-20th century, the act of balancing nutrition was in a state of arrested infancy. This was a time where processed foods, fast foods, and general foods of convenience were rapidly pushing out the square meals of yesterday. There arose a need, particularly for young America, to establish some sort of nutritional guideline and the ever-popular “Four Basic Food Groups” were created, and they were as follows:

(1) Meats, poultry, fish, dry beans and peas, eggs, and nuts
(2) Dairy products, such as milk, cheese, and yogurt;
(3) Grains
(4) Fruits and vegetables.

Below is a graphic (circa 1956) that demonstrates this concept for otherwise clueless children:

Then in 1992 the United States government realized some of the apparent limitations of these four basics, and erected the iconic Food Guide Pyramid (see graphic below):

The Food Guide Pyramid was graphically confounding and gave young and old the impression that they needed to have a firm grasp of what constitutes a serving size in order to understand good and sensible nutrition. Also, fats, oils, and sweets were oddly placed at the top of the pyramid, giving the false impression that these nutritional voids were essential toppings for the previous four (now five) basic food groups (and why were they included in the pyramid at all?). Then in 2005, the Food Pyramid was updated to be something less than a hierarchy and more of a fractioned pie chart with a little runner guy trying to climb the thing, all of which did nothing but confound eaters more than ever, and render the Pyramid more obsolete than ever (see below):


Now, as part of the FLOTUS (Michelle Obama’s) ongoing nutritional efforts, along with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, something new has been introduced that dismantles the flawed Food Pyramid once and for all. Check out MyPlate, which is a more basic graphic depicting a dinner plate split into four quadrants, with an accompanying cup or side plate.

The graphic is obviously more user friendly and intuitive (we don’t generally eat off of pyramids, but plates are common when we are not consuming our meals out of Burger King bags while attempting to drive). The Agriculture Department has also launched an accompanying website to promote the new “plate” idea, which includes tip sheets that encourage Americans to eat fish twice a week and avoid high-fat and salty foods. The new plate icon, while being an ideal graphic for those of us who detest the idea of having our foods mixed together, is also a means of simplifying the message. In essence, it is an attempt to make us more mindful and disciplined about what we are eating, not just on a daily basis, but also meal by meal.
Assuredly the MyPlate development is an improvement, but hardly a perfect solution to the longstanding problem of how to promote good and balanced nutrition. The icon alone doesn’t address things like portion size or the fact that the protein quadrant is exceedingly vague, as grains and dairy can all contain significant amounts of protein (that said, it is nice to finally see meat replaced by the more interpretive “protein”).

What is your feeling on MyPlate? Is this an improvement on the old model? Do these sorts of charts and graphs actually make an impact on national nutrition, or are they an abundant waste of money (the current MyPlate campaign required around two million in tax dollars to happen)? How could this model be greatly improved to actually reach out to the people that need this guidance the most?


Elena Poensgen
Elena Poensgen5 months ago

Thank you

Elena Poensgen
Elena Poensgen9 months ago

Thank you

Jo S.
Jo S.about a year ago

Thank you Eric.

John Ditchman
John Ditchman3 years ago

Did anyone ever really understand what the food pyramid, and then My Pyramid were about? I could grasp the 7 basic food groups. The food pyramid blurred it, and the "Improvement" totally confused it. The plate is still annoyingly obtuse.

Ellie Damann
.4 years ago


Lindy E.
Belinda E.5 years ago

I had never heard of Joel Fuhrman's food pyramid, so I googled it. (The chart itself is at
This pyramid is fantastic! I honestly don't ever expect to eat in accordance with that pyramid, but it's a lot better goal than the UDSA "guides"! Thank you, Adam K.

Treesa Math
tia Math5 years ago

both suggestions are good. the plate gives a symbolic aspect ,as if you are eating out of a plate . it gives a mental picture so kids can easily remember....but the pyramid gives info of how much % to eat and the pictures of those foods which are in a particular category .... i think both are fine.

Adam K.
Douglas K.5 years ago

I'd have to go with Joel Fuhrman's food pyramid which has at its base fruit and vegetables, then beans, then nuts and seeds, then whole grains, then optional. If people don't want to follow the food advice, they don't have to, but at least the science is good and they will live if they follow the advice. As it stands they won't live if they follow the advice. Now you tell me what that constitutes in the law, giving people bad food advice that they die if they follow it.

Amanda J.
Amanda J.5 years ago

This is an improvement on the pyramid because it is graphically intuitive.

Faith Purdy
Faith Purdy5 years ago

the plate is deffinitely a big improvement, but i think people need to realize that they're not going to get all the imformation they need about eating healthy from a graphic. you really need to know potion sizes (which you can find on food labels), what's best for you personally, and a bunch of other things.
that said my plate is deffinitely a more helpful guide than the previous pyramids, especially if you visit the website.