my care2
make a difference

causes & news

news network

socially conscious news and video shared and rated by the community

"Tug-O-War" Oil and Gas Lease Sites Must Past Tribal Test


Environment  (tags: environment, oil and gas, leased land, nature, habitat, protection, wildlife )

Cher
- 220 days ago - planetsave.com
Oil and gas leases have been a hot topic for a long time, especially since the controversial disruption of a BLM land sale by student activist Tim DeChristopher in Salt Lake City this past December. The sale which, according to some, was a midnight move
Comments

Jamie L. (221)
Friday July 3, 2009, 9:21 am
I really hate the idea of exploring for more oil, regardless of where... :( Thanks Cher... And the BLM is really starting to tick me off more than I already was... :(

Oil and gas leases have been a hot topic for a long time, especially since the controversial disruption of a BLM land sale by student activist Tim DeChristopher in Salt Lake City this past December. The sale which, according to some, was a midnight move by the Bush administration found itself floundering when an unknown bidder (DeChristopher) won parcel after parcel of land. Since December the leased parcels have been pulled back and forth between the BLM and the Interior, between developers and nature-lovers.

This story goes back before DeChristopher, back before the rushed lease sale. Yet it shows that the tug-o-war has been going on for years; and it hasn’t stopped. When the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) recently told the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that it cannot move forward with 11 oil and gas leases without following federal cultural preservation law and consulting with concerned Native American tribes, a sigh was heard coming from Nine Mile Canyon in southern Utah.

The parcels of land in question were originally sold by the BLM in 2003 and are located in the Bad Land Cliffs between the Ashley National Forest and the Desbrough Canyon - in close proximity to Nine Mile Canyon, which is renowned for its remarkable concentration of rock art sites and other cultural resources. Since that sale, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (SUWA) has been fighting to keep oil and gas exploration and development away from such treasures, fearing that the leases would have negative impacts on the cultural sites.

SUWA appealed to the IBLA arguing that the BLM had failed to follow all the specific requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and, in 2007, won a small victory. The IBLA ruled in favor of SUWA, acknowledging the BLM’s failure to perform all the required analysis and consultation with affected tribes and that the sale thus violated the law. The (illegal) leases were suspended as further steps were taken by the BLM to comply.

The BLM bought back the parcels of land, standing with the original claim that they were sell-able. However, SUWA disagreed and appealed again. In an April 2009 ruling, the IBLA agreed with SUWA again, claiming that the BLM had still not complied with the law.

The recent ruling requires the BLM to follow the specifications of the NHPA. Now the BLM must consult with all Native American tribes that attach religious and cultural significance to an area proposed for leasing. While the BLM consulted with several tribes concerning the leased parcels, it did not consult with either the Hopi Tribe or the Laguna Pueblo, both of which appoint significance to the cultural sites. Before the leases can move forward, these two tribes must be consulted by the BLM.

But where will this story end? Is the exploration and development of oil and gas sites more important than the land? More important than the culture? More important than the people?
 

Gillian Miller (124)
Saturday July 4, 2009, 5:12 pm
Well done DeChristopher! The time may come when resources are so scarce that peoples rights are trampled on but not today, the tribal interests must be respected. After all, would anyone like it if someone came along and dug up an art gallery full of pictures and sculptures or a house and garden of historican interest eg The White House although if George W was in there I think that most people would accept the trade off!).
 

David t. (321)
Saturday July 4, 2009, 10:40 pm
The Stone People(Rocks) are the eldest living beings on Mother Earth,therefore are deserving of the utmost respect.I have been told that they serve the role of record keepers.The Great Spirit breathed its breath into each and every stone thus granting them all unique and valuable gifts and lessons to bestow upon Earth Surface people.
 

Chaz Gaily Berlusconi (279)
Sunday July 5, 2009, 7:57 am
Isn't it just amazing... that the BLM's sins are always hidden in the dark... hence midnight move... firstly they want to do away with the mustangs, and now they want to take this land away from the Native people... Gas and oil have their places in this world but not if it steals and takes away a whole culture with it... The pride and joy of an American icon.. its native people
 

Winefred M. (76)
Tuesday July 7, 2009, 8:16 am
Noted. TY Cher.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)
20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

butterfly credits on the news network

  • 3 credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • 2 credits for vetting any other story
  • 20 credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Environment

Cher C.

Cher C.
Cher's contributions:
Stories noted recently: 1058
Stories submitted: 19710
Front Page stories: 18535




 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.
Copyright © 2010 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved