Tuesday November 6, 2012, 8:54 am
Noted. It's very easy to see which president would be better for the environment......the one that isn't in bed with those that not only don't do enough to solve the problem, they continue to deny that it even exists. President Obama is the clear choice on the environment over Gov Romney.

Tuesday November 6, 2012, 12:32 pm
All I know is, Obama did nothing to bring FEMA back to those who did not live in their shore homes as a permanent address. Watching him and Christie walk around the ruined Jersey shore, offering "comfort" was simply grotesque.
Obama knew these people are ruined forever - there is no rebuilding without FEMA support. If he came to my place in Belmar, I'd spit in his face.

Tuesday November 6, 2012, 11:33 pm
Thanks Cher. Climate change is a serious issue that is real and needs to be discussed and addressed. Mittens belongs to the party of the pro-corporate, environmental hating, science doubting climate change deniers so that would be no help at all. At least with Obama who is more of a contemporary, modern day thinker there's some measure of hope for stopping climate change or pushing it back.

Allan Y., we've known for a long time what side your bread is buttered on, but how much of your comment is true concern for climate change and the victims of Sandy and how much of it is your usual blind hatred for President Obama?

Wednesday November 7, 2012, 7:08 am
Noted.

Wednesday November 7, 2012, 6:32 pm
You may recall, Allan, George W. Bush strumming on a guitar while New Orleans, for one, was drowning.

Thursday November 8, 2012, 11:53 am
Thanks

Friday November 9, 2012, 3:05 am
noted, thank you Cher