Start A Petition

Tell the EPA to Keep Pollution in Check and Protect Our Beaches ! PLEASE SIGN ! !

Environment  (tags: environment, destruction, habitat, nature, protection, pollution )

- 1762 days ago -
New rules would prevent rainfall from becoming polluted runoff and contaminating waterways by naturally filtering it into the ground and otherwise keeping it from running off-site. The Environmental Protection Agency was supposed to draft new rules to

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Sue H (7)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:02 am
Message sent thanks.

Pat B (356)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:06 am

Nicole W (646)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:11 am
Thank you for telling the EPA to modernize stormwater runoff and keep our beaches safe. ~ ty Cher

Past Member (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:14 am

. (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:17 am
Signed and noted - thank you dear Cher

jeanne schreurs (205)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:47 am

Christeen A (369)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:48 am

Joe R (190)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:52 am
Thanks Cher. Signed and noted.

Karen Gee (97)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:09 am
Signed and noted TY Cher

Mary T (358)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:26 am
Signed & noted - thank you Cher

. (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:31 am
Signed and Noted.

Amy E (66)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:38 am

Monica T (278)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:01 am
Done! Thanks, Cher

Julie E (405)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:05 am
Noted, signed and shared.

. (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:27 am
message sent

Past Member (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:28 am
NS&S. Thank you for taking action!

Thomas P (280)
Monday July 29, 2013, 12:12 pm
Noted and signed...thanks Cher

Carol B (409)
Monday July 29, 2013, 12:33 pm
Noted and signed.

Twyla Sparks (208)
Monday July 29, 2013, 1:20 pm
thank you

Past Member (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 1:36 pm
Noted, message sent, shared! Thank you, Cher!

Lisa W (143)
Monday July 29, 2013, 1:39 pm
2 signatures, ty Cher

Past Member (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 1:46 pm
noted thanks

Virgene L (51)
Monday July 29, 2013, 2:09 pm
There has been so much pollution in the past that needs remedial action. This is a good way to slow down more pollution to help us "catch up" on what already needs to be done. Thanks.

Barbara DeFratis (23)
Monday July 29, 2013, 2:21 pm
Signed and Shared. Thank You.

Ruth L (242)
Monday July 29, 2013, 2:22 pm
Signed/noted. Thanks Cher

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Monday July 29, 2013, 2:50 pm
Thank you! (s, n, p, t)

Mari 's (1356)
Monday July 29, 2013, 3:38 pm

Animae C (513)
Monday July 29, 2013, 3:59 pm
Thank you for telling the EPA to modernize stormwater runoff and keep our beaches safe.

David C (131)
Monday July 29, 2013, 4:39 pm
done, thanks.

S J (130)
Monday July 29, 2013, 4:40 pm
Done, thanks Cher.

Bartlomiej T (296)
Monday July 29, 2013, 5:21 pm
Signed. Thank you, Cher.

Vicky P (476)
Monday July 29, 2013, 6:12 pm
Noted and signed

Aletta Kraan (146)
Monday July 29, 2013, 7:11 pm
Done !!!

Past Member (0)
Monday July 29, 2013, 9:51 pm
Thank you for taking action!

Thank you for telling the EPA to modernize stormwater runoff and keep our beaches safe.

The EPA promised to draft updated regulations by June 2013 to handle the devastating problem of stormwater runoff - but that deadline has passed with no action. Now we face another summer with too many swimming advisories and beach closures.

We deserve clean water and safe places to swim -- and the EPA can act to make them safer. Share this action on Facebook and Twitter together we can push the EPA to make our beaches and waterways cleaner.

Heidi Aubrey (5)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:15 pm
Signed and noted.

Sheila D (194)
Monday July 29, 2013, 10:21 pm
Signed and noted, hope it helps. Thank you.

Fran F (118)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:37 pm
Signed and noted, thanks, Cher.

Inge B (202)
Monday July 29, 2013, 11:53 pm
Sent the message


Tuesday July 30, 2013, 12:57 am
N & S. Thanks Cher

Giana P (398)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 1:46 am
Thank you for telling the EPA to modernize stormwater runoff and keep our beaches safe.

Frances Darcy (133)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 2:31 am

Past Member (0)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 2:59 am

Victoria Pohrebna (279)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 3:46 am
Thank you for telling the EPA to modernize stormwater runoff and keep our beaches safe.

Ben O (170)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 4:33 am

. (0)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 5:29 am
Signed and noted. Thanks for sharing, Cher. I like going to the beach, but not when it's polluted.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 5:44 am

linda n (3877)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 5:59 am

Unnikrishnan Sasidharan (44)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 6:17 am

Ann P (17)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 6:47 am
Noted & signed. L♡ve ☮ Peace.

Donna Hamilton (159)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 6:49 am
N&S. Thanks.

Marija M (29)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 9:12 am

Sara P (55)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 10:16 am
Signed, thanks Cher.

Betty Kelly (4)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 12:21 pm
We should do everything we can to protect and preserve the land and water.

Dorothy N (63)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 12:36 pm

House Appropriations to mark up bill to slash EPA budget by 34% and kill carbon rulemaking
Posted on July 22, 2013 by Rick Piltz

Demonstrating once again that their service to corporate interests and their fear of primary election challenges from right-wing candidates trumps their interest in governance, the Republican majority on a House Appropriations subcommittee is set to mark up a fiscal year 2014 bill tomorrow that would gut the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget and block the agency’s ability to take any significant steps forward in clean air and clean water policy.

From the House Appropriations Committee website:

Washington, July 22 -

The House Appropriations Committee today released the fiscal year 2014 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill, which will be considered in subcommittee tomorrow. The legislation includes funding for the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Forest Service, and various independent and related agencies.

In total, the bill includes $24.3 billion in base funding, which is a cut of $5.5 billion below the fiscal year 2013 enacted level (-19%) and a cut of $4 billion below the current level caused by sequestration cuts.

The bill funds the EPA at $5.5 billion, a reduction of $2.8 billion – or 34% – below the fiscal year 2013 enacted level.

The bill continues a cap on EPA’s personnel at the 1992 level, cuts operational accounts by $921 million (20%), cuts the office of the EPA Administrator by more than 30%, cuts the EPA Congressional Affairs office by 50%, and makes other cuts and reductions to programs within the agency.

The legislation also includes provisions to rein in various problematic, costly, and potentially job-killing regulatory actions by the Administration. …

The Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies subcommittee will “mark up” the FY 2014 bill on July 23. A Full Committee Print (bill text to be marked up) is here.

The proposed cuts to EPA and other environmental and natural-resource budgets reflect a pattern in which House Republicans aim to cut domestic programs sharply below the current sequestration levels.

In addition to its over-the-top $2.8 billion proposed EPA budget cut, from the FY 2013 level of $8.3 billion to $5.5 billion, the bill would block EPA rulemaking to limit carbon emissions from power plants. The bill contains numerous “policy riders” – congressional appropriatons bill langiage – that would control agency activities by specifying that funds could not be used in support of a list of specific environmental activities.

It is clear that House Republicans intend to use the appropriations process to wage war on Obama’s Climate Action Plan. It can be expected that numerous additional riders to this effect will be offered as amendments during the committee mark-up of the bill, and again when it goes to the House floor. Under what used to be a ‘normal’ legislative process, policy riders in appropriations bill language could function as significant expressions of congressional intent. Today, however, the offering of numerous riders that clearly have no chance of being enacted, just to please political funders and an ideological partisan support base, is just more of the bad political theater we have become accustomed to in Washington.

Also, Greenwire reported July 22:

The bill proposes steep cuts to the popular federal loan programs intended to repair decrepit wastewater systems. The Clean Water and Drinking Water state revolving funds would see a combined 69 percent cut from President Obama's proposed budget, which was already $472 million shy of fiscal 2013 levels. The Clean Water State Revolving Fund would take the deeper hit, being slashed to just $250 million.

The revolving funds have come under the knife repeatedly in recent years, even as the country's water infrastructure is aging and failing. The American Society of Civil Engineers recently graded the nation's wastewater and stormwater system a D, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors estimates that the country needs as much as $4.8 trillion in water and wastewater investment over the next two decades.

The bill would block the federal Office of Surface Mining's forthcoming stream protection rule, meant to protect waterways from coal strip mining. …

The measure would exempt agriculture from Clean Air Act rules for pollutants and from reporting requirements for greenhouse gases. …

The bill would provide $1.06 billion for the Fish and Wildlife Service, a steep cut of $401 million, or 27 percent, below 2013 enacted levels. …

The National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities is cut by 49 percent and the Smithsonian and National Gallery of Art each get a full 19 percent cut. …

The bill also would kill progress on a number of key pending EPA Clean Water Act regulatory decisions.

And so forth.

“We have a clear responsibility to act now on climate change,” said newly-confirmed EPA administrator Gina McCarthy in a July 22 message to agency employees. “President Obama recently said, ‘The question now is whether we have the courage to act before it is too late.’ This agency has the courage to act. We can make it happen. But we need all hands on deck.”

Some impediments: (1) It remains to be seen how aggressive the White House and its regulatory police at the Office of Management and Budget will allow EPA to be on climate policy; and (2) while Obama’s Climate Action Plan tries to work around legislative obstructionism and climate change denialism in Congress, Congress must approve funding in order for federal agencies to function, and legislative language can place restrictions on agency actions.

Now, it seems safe to expect that the Senate will not go along with trashing the EPA budget, along with those of the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Arts and Humanities endowments. Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, has been pretty much a stalwart in her support of EPA (as well as of NASA’s Earth Science budget that supports climate observing systems and research).

Most likely no Interior and Environment Appropriations Bill for FY 2014 will be enacted – certainly not before the start of FY 2014 on October 1, 2013. We can expect that, for part if not all of FY 2014, EPA and several other agencies in this bill, including the Forest Service, will be operating under a Continuing Resolution at current (cut by sequestration) budget levels. Hopefully the Democrats in the Senate won’t cave on any of the regulatory policy-blocking riders that will be advanced by the House majority.

It seems that, in addition to acting as a loyal front operation for politically connected economic interests that fund their campaigns, the House majority is primarily interested in protecting their own gerrymandered seats in Congress. And for that, typically the only thing they might have to worry about is facing a primary election opponent who is even more radically right-wing nd uncompromising than they have been.

Thus, endless gestures of political theater like the EPA appropriations bill. It can be as bad as it needs to be to keep the electoral base in line. Those who pass it know that it will never be enacted with Senate approval and a presidential signature. Thus, they will never be accountable for the damage that would result from actually enacting their legislative gestures. This is what “government accountability” is devolving into in today’s Congress.

Valerie H (133)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 12:42 pm
Thank you - signed

Past Member (0)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 1:43 pm
Signed ~ Thank You

Hugo L (255)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 2:18 pm
Noted & signed, thanks Cher

ER C (65)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 4:34 pm

Aaron Bouchard (158)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 6:47 pm
signed and noted thanks

Diane K (134)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 7:19 pm
Signed. thx Cher!

Esther Z (94)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 10:22 pm
Noted and signed.

Heidi Aubrey (5)
Tuesday July 30, 2013, 11:57 pm
Signed and noted.

Sherri G (128)
Wednesday July 31, 2013, 1:45 am
Signed and Noted TY Cher

Daniel Partlow (179)
Wednesday July 31, 2013, 5:15 am

Saturday August 3, 2013, 4:54 am
Thank you!

Gina Caracci (219)
Tuesday August 6, 2013, 7:28 pm

BA R (6)
Thursday August 8, 2013, 10:07 am

Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Environment

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.