START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Tell Secretary of State Kerry: Do Not Allow Disposal of Syria's Chemical Weapon Stocks at Sea - SIGN PLEASE !


Environment  (tags: destruction, ecosystems, oceans, pollution, water, MARINE LIFE, chemicals, toxics )

Angelika
- 226 days ago - change.org
The United States is proposing to dispose of Syrian chemical weapons at sea. Doing so would put already vulnerable marine ecosystems at further harm. We must not allow this plan to go through and urge Secretary Kerry to consider other alternatives.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Angelika R. (146)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 3:04 pm
This BADLY NEEDS SIGNATURES ! Only some 200 + so far.
They MUST BE KIDDING, if the DOS is serious about THIS, need it tell you what that means for KXL ..-?!
 

Angelika R. (146)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 3:06 pm
I've circulated a message but still decided to post it here for wider exposure. This must be stopped.
 

Marie H. (164)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 3:15 pm
So signed!

Thanks Angelika.
 

Franshisca Dearmas (97)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 3:21 pm
Noted and signed. TY Angelika
 

Henriette Matthijssen (146)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 3:50 pm
Already sign a forward from Constace F to me. Thanks Angie.
 

Peta Clarke (23)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 4:49 pm
Signed and noted thank you Angelika. This has been done before with very bad results. Don't our leaders realize this and do their homework and research before they say they will do something. The man is a dickhead.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 4:53 pm
Peta-clear answer: NO they don't. They have others doing assessment for them and we all know how that turns out...
 

AniMae Chi (387)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 5:06 pm
Signed through your circulated PM Angelika.

You have already signed the petition
"The Honorable John Kerry, Secretary of State: Do not allow disposal of Syria's chemical weapon stocks at sea"
with 260 supporters
740 NEEDED
 

Alan Lambert (83)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 5:37 pm
Signed and Noted
 

Natasha Salgado (505)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 5:40 pm
S+S-thx Angelika
 

Robert S. (115)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 9:01 pm
Thanks for signing.with 291 supporters
 

Krish Away (43)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 9:27 pm
Signed
with 295 supporters
705 NEEDED

& Thx Angelika
 

Frans Badenhorst (546)
Sunday November 24, 2013, 9:41 pm
Signed
with 297 supporters
703 NEEDED
 

Ljiljana Milic (93)
Monday November 25, 2013, 12:28 am
Already signed - 674 NEEDED
& Tbak you Angelika
 

Birgitta S. (221)
Monday November 25, 2013, 9:47 am
Vielen Dank, liebe Angelika für dieses ~
S
 

Ben Oscarsito (351)
Monday November 25, 2013, 9:50 am
Done!
 

Aaron Bouchard (121)
Monday November 25, 2013, 9:57 am
signed and noted thanks
 

Beverly M. (85)
Monday November 25, 2013, 10:19 am
Noted and signed ~ Thank you Angelika!
 

Mike M. (54)
Monday November 25, 2013, 10:49 am
N&Signed
with 438 supporters
562 NEEDED
 

Arielle S. (313)
Monday November 25, 2013, 11:10 am
Duh - doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what is wrong with that idea! Signed with thanks...
 

Henrik Thorsen (28)
Monday November 25, 2013, 12:18 pm
Signed.
 

monka blanke (74)
Monday November 25, 2013, 12:41 pm
Noted and signed ~ Thank you Angelika.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Monday November 25, 2013, 12:46 pm
Arielle: "Duh - doesn't take a rocket scientist to see what is wrong with that idea! "
DAMN RIGHT and the very same applies to KXL- but YET they come up with such ideas- now go figure..
 

Angelika R. (146)
Monday November 25, 2013, 12:49 pm
While the DOS surely has great achievements on other sectors it appears where ever they are responsible for environmental matters, they FAIL or or too hesitant.
 

norma laborie (31)
Monday November 25, 2013, 1:20 pm
signed
 

Dave C. (209)
Monday November 25, 2013, 1:28 pm
done
 

Lois Jordan (55)
Monday November 25, 2013, 1:31 pm
Signed. 484 supporters. Noted. Thank you, Angelika.
 

Birgit W. (140)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:00 pm
Signed.
 

John De Avalon (35)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:04 pm
Gladly signed!
 

Apolonia Pl (403)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:10 pm
Signed with 506 supporters, 494 NEEDED
 

Edwin M. (366)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:11 pm
Thank you Angelika and thank you Deb E for the forward
 

Robert Tomlinson (64)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:32 pm
Signed and Noted!
 

Donna G. (38)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:34 pm
I signed the petiton. If the petition gets enough supporters, I wonder what kind of options would be considered.
 

Nelson Baker (0)
Monday November 25, 2013, 2:42 pm
Signed. It is had to believe they would even consider such a stupid idea.
 

Howard Crosse (15)
Monday November 25, 2013, 3:07 pm
Happy to support, thank you for posting. Surely it is well beyond time that we stopped looking at the seas on our planet as somewhere that we can dump and forget anything that we don't like. Man created these awful weapons, it is mans' responsibility to dispose of them properly, not by the cheapest method available.
 

Patsy Olive (0)
Monday November 25, 2013, 3:33 pm
signed, noted and emailed . Thanks.
 

Kate Kenner (202)
Monday November 25, 2013, 4:20 pm
Sure, because the animals who live in the sea really need more toxic waste in their home. What is he thinking?

Singed of course.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Monday November 25, 2013, 4:21 pm
Donna-it should not be too hard to gain enough signatures ! and if there were no other alternatives this sccientific penal, the PA certainly would not suggest it.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Monday November 25, 2013, 4:26 pm
Kate-" What is he thinking? " well, equal "rights" for both I guess. Feed the maritime wildlife the same toxic crap as the people.
 

Dori C. (13)
Monday November 25, 2013, 4:56 pm
signed.
 

Ellen Kent (0)
Monday November 25, 2013, 5:05 pm
Signed/Sent
 

Jo S. (482)
Monday November 25, 2013, 5:31 pm
Noted, signed & shared.
Thanks Angelika.
 

Vicky P. (461)
Monday November 25, 2013, 6:00 pm
noted, signed
 

Mike H. (216)
Monday November 25, 2013, 8:03 pm
Gladly signed!
 

Mary Donnelly (46)
Monday November 25, 2013, 8:14 pm
Signed and sent.
 

Ondine J. (141)
Monday November 25, 2013, 8:53 pm
Noted and signed, thanks Angelika
 

Dianne D. (453)
Monday November 25, 2013, 8:54 pm
signed
 

Julianna D. (18)
Monday November 25, 2013, 9:46 pm
Noted and signed
 

Jelica R. (157)
Monday November 25, 2013, 9:56 pm
What a sick idea! Don't they realize that Mediterranean is a closed, and thus very vulnerable, sea? And it is overcrowded, too polluted and exploited to the bone already. Insane, dumb, shortsighted, stupid ... , but when the first damage analysis become public, those wise politicians will be out of the office, sharing their wisdom with equally wise audience, happily charging a very modest $200.000 fee per 20-minute speech.
 

Karen Chestney (100)
Monday November 25, 2013, 10:35 pm
Petition....signed....thanks.
 

Inge Bjorkman (123)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 12:57 am
Signed

Love
 

John S. (297)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 1:56 am
Done.
 

Victoria Pohrebna (269)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 3:46 am
Signed with 684 supporters...316 NEEDED.
 

Kerstin Strobl (325)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 4:01 am
signed
 

Lloyd H. (46)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 6:25 am
No! I will not sign this erroneous piece of politicking. First off the Sea Platform is not the brain child of either Secretary Kerry or the USA, the solution to the problem that no one wants the weapons, that must go destroyed in their backyard, originates with the OPCW. The OPCW, Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, is the implementation arm of the CWC, Chemical Weapons Convention, the International Treaty of 1997. The facts are that the Sea Platform is no more dangerous to the environment than any of the other land based methods. Actually it is better as to date No Nation is willing to have them destroyed within their borders or their controlled marine space.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 7:46 am
Lloyd- I assume that you've done your research on this so guess I might have to respect your stance. little can I say on that..
 

Rehana VN (0)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 9:17 am
Just where & how will all the other countries dispose of their chemical weapons!
 

Mariette G. (145)
Tuesday November 26, 2013, 2:32 pm
Signed, thanks Angelika!
 

DAVID LAIRD (0)
Wednesday November 27, 2013, 12:26 am
SIGNED
 

Floodedarea Please Help (220)
Wednesday November 27, 2013, 1:00 am
Already signed with 784 supporters
216 NEEDED
noted...
Thank you, Angelika & Henriette.
 

desanka s. (374)
Wednesday November 27, 2013, 2:32 am
Done! Thank you Angelika for posting and Henriette for the forward.
 

jess b (22)
Friday November 29, 2013, 1:40 pm
signed ty
 

Angelika R. (146)
Saturday November 30, 2013, 6:33 pm
“The United States has offered to contribute destruction technology, full operational support and financing to neutralize Syria's priority chemicals,” announced the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical weapons (OPCW) in a statement issued on Saturday.

so, now we are learning more and it looks not as outrageously insane as it did at first glance.. pls read
 

Angelika R. (146)
Saturday November 30, 2013, 6:40 pm
After what I've heard today I must respect Lloyd's point and he may be right. In fact they will use a sophisticated method, hydrolysis, to make the chemicals innoxious, delute them with water before deposing.
The Sarin nerve gas will be burnt later.
 

Betsy Bee (1047)
Monday December 2, 2013, 5:40 pm
Done.
 

john byrne (51)
Tuesday December 3, 2013, 1:09 am


SIGNED.
 

Sergio Padilla (62)
Wednesday December 4, 2013, 12:13 pm
Is this true?? What the hell!!! Signed.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.