START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

House Passes Bill to Increase Logging in Northwest Forests -

Environment  (tags: ecosystems, environment, destruction, logging, marine ecosystems, protection, habitat, habitatdestruction, oceans, nature, humans, water, conservation )

- 742 days ago -
The bill, HR 1526, includes the O&C Trust, Conservation and Jobs Act, which would open logging on U.S. Bureau of Land Management lands and increase timber receipts to Jackson and other counties. -

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Roseann d. (178)
Wednesday September 25, 2013, 3:37 pm
How many trees do these idiots think we can bare to lose. Strip these aholes naked and let 'em dwell on that in Death Valley. Aholes!

Theodore Shayne (56)
Wednesday September 25, 2013, 4:01 pm

Ellen G. (342)
Wednesday September 25, 2013, 7:14 pm
Go Figure

Sheila D. (26)
Wednesday September 25, 2013, 7:29 pm
Noted. Thanks, Cal.

Elle J. (276)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 12:43 am
It doesn't take a genius to figure out that less trees mean more danger to the climate. Of course those that are still preaching that climate change doesn't exist couldn't care less. They need to listen to the scientists. There have been a record number of forest fires in nearly every part of the country. We don't need to have open season on logging. It all comes down to GREED.

Christeen Anderson (647)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 4:36 am
What the hell are they thinking or not.

Past Member (0)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 5:11 am
What is wrong with these jerks. All they care about is making money, money will not give them the oxygen they need.

Birgitta S. (206)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 5:43 am
like Roseann D. & Christeen Andeson saying.

Birgitta S. (206)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 5:46 am
correction: like Christeen ANDERSON! saying.

Franshisca Dearmas (89)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 5:47 am
Noted. TY Cal

Gloria picchetti (305)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 5:59 am
I read the article before forming an opinion. First of all the president might still veto the bill. They are not going to cut down every tree in Oregon and in fact they are going to save old-growth forest preserves, including tracts of land with trees that are more than 120 years old. These are the trees we want to save. Forest fires are fueled by small trees. Large trees don't burn well and frequently survive fires.
In addition to that, "It also would add 58,100 acres to the Rogue Wilderness Area in the Lower Rogue River drainage. The proposal designates 93 miles of 35 tributaries of the Rogue as either "wild," "scenic" or "recreational" under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act."
Also "It also would ban mining on 19 tributaries on the Rogue and 11 miles on the Chetco River."

Fi T. (18)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 6:28 am
That should be reduced instead for a better home

Dogan Ozkan (5)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 6:43 am

Frans Badenhorst (573)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 6:49 am
there's a saying that goes something like this :" I wonder how much money we will have after destroying all forests, polluted every river and poisoned all the soil..."

Michael Kirkby (90)
Thursday September 26, 2013, 10:22 am

Nimue Pendragon (322)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 4:04 am
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.
site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!