my care2
make a difference

causes & news

news network

socially conscious news and video shared and rated by the community

In Guinea-Bissau, a Victim of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Calls for Its End


Health & Wellness  (tags: women, violence, children, risks, exercise, FGM, FGM/Cprevention )

Madalena
- 718 days ago - reliefweb.int
Ms. Cisse is committed to continuing to fight for FGM/C. "I am not afraid," she says. "I will do whatever it takes to have this traumatizing practice stop. This razor blade caused more than physical wounds in a woman's life."
Comments

Past Member (0)
Saturday December 22, 2007, 5:43 pm
There are a lot of wealthy educated women who are now supporting this practice as a cultural rite of passage, I think that it should be left up to the individual to decide if they want elective surgery, however, children should never be subjected to procedures that are not necessary, and could be emotionally and physically harmful.
 

Madalena Lobao-Tello (448)
Saturday December 22, 2007, 6:13 pm
Kristina
If a adult woman ( with more than 18 years old)want to be submited to FGM is a right but if a children
is submtited do FGM is torture!

The right to life and physical integrity are considered core human rights. These rights, while often associated with the right to freedom from torture, encompass a number of broader human rights principles, including the inherent dignity of the person, the right to liberty and security of person, and the right to privacy. Acts of violence that result in death or severe bodily harm obviously interfere with a person’s rights to life, physical integrity and privacy.
Physical integrity is the right to make independent decisions in matters affecting one’s own body. An unauthorised invasion or alteration of a person’s body represents a disregard for that fundamental right.

Female genital mutilation violates the right to life in the event that death results from the ritual. Since the practice is premised on the notion that women’s bodies are inherently flawed and require correction, it does not respect women’s inherent dignity. Respect for women’s dignity implies acceptance of their physical qualities – natural appearance of their genitalia and their normal sexual function. A decision to alter those qualities should not be imposed upon a woman or girl for the purpose of reinforcing socially defined roles.

Similarly, because female genital mutilation is an intervention into one of the most intimate aspects of a woman’s life, her sexuality, the practice violates her privacy rights. It is also a form of violence against women because it may be against the victim’s will or be carried out before she has attained age of consent (18 years).
Deprivation of liberty is obvious when girls are forcibly restrained during the ritual. Young women are highly susceptible to coercion by adults. The child may also feel coerced due to various types of persuasion. Children are also unlikely to understand and have access to information about the consequences of the practice and potential complications.

Refusing to undergo the practice may jeopardise a woman’s family relations, her social life and her ability to find a spouse. The fear of these consequences, make meaningful consent impossible.

Therefore, a woman may consent not because she accepts the tradition but because she fears the repercussions of refusing.

The UN regards the practice as an act of violence against women. The Torture Convention defines torture as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person. This definition does not reflect the mental state of most genital mutilation practitioners and parents procuring genital mutilation for their daughters.

Family members may procure the ritual for girls with hope of securing their acceptance in society or meeting culturally-defined obligations. Pain and suffering are not inflicted solely to cause harm or for the purpose contemplated in the Torture Convention’s definition.

Can the practice be regarded as “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” as per the definition of torture above? If such treatment requires intent to harm, the practice cannot fall within its parameters.

The writer is a volunteer with Uganda Voluntary Development Association

SOURCE: New Vision Online
URL: http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/459/549806
DATE: 2/18/2007

 

FreeSpirit Running (447)
Sunday December 23, 2007, 7:59 am
Thank u Mada..this is noted..I don't care if the practice is a cultural rite...Where are the HUMAN RIGHTS?...No woman or child should be subjected to this form of barbaric practice...it is a terrible thing to mess with what our Creator has given us. Our bodies are our temples..and it should be taught that way..
keep up the good work Madalena..love you hon..
FreeSpiritRunning...
 

Jim Phillips (2588)
Sunday December 23, 2007, 3:16 pm
"In Guinea-Bissau, a victim of female genital mutilation/cutting calls for its end".

Those people in those countries need to stop this barbaric practice of "FGM".
Disgusting! The way FGM is practiced in those countries is not a rite of passage.
Not even a legitimate medical procedure the way it is done in those countries
with unsterile equipment. Women who undergo this "treatment" are left with numerous
medical problems later in life, for those who survive this barbaric treatment, infections, etc...

Those who believe in this practice over there do not want their women to enjoy sex.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)
20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.
Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved