Worse insurance, less money-thus a lower premium and Republican "savings." Couple that with 17 percent uninsured after 10 years, increased premiums for "less healthy" enrollees, some malpractice "reform" and a few other sundry measures and we've got a

In health reform, as so many continue to extol the virtues of an unfettered private market- a "free market" if you will-it may be of some help to consider just what a free market is.

on the "Tell Me Something I Don't Know Portion" of this weekend's Chris Matthews Show, Newsweek's Senior Washington Correspondent, Howard Fineman, stated

As a scholar who studies both health care and immigration (and sometimes the intersection between the two), I've grown increasingly frustrated with the misconceptions surrounding this issue

A little of this, a little of that. Some points of interest regarding the latest in the health reform blogosphere-- and the wildcard

The Obama administration and the gang of six's Republican Senators Charles Grassley and Mike Enzi continue to trade barbs about who is "not being bipartisan."

Included within the Preamble as reasons for creating this more perfect Union and its Constitution are "to... promote the general Welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity."

Prof. Hall on the constitutionality of an insurance mandate. Contrary to some recent musings by some attorneys in various media and reports.

As summer wears on to an inauspicious health reform end, and we await pronouncements and more posturing from the gang of six

when dealing with information-especially information doing duty as a foundation upon which Medical Insurers stand "poised to reap a healthy bonanza"-considering the source- and considering that the source of that information is owned by one of the