Start A Petition

Promethean Claims: Should We Be Concerned About the Loss Of Scientific Neutrality?

Science & Tech  (tags: biotechnology, science, news, technology, scientists, research, investigation, discovery, computers, GeneticEngineering )

- 309 days ago -
Biotechnology's Promethean claims to explain, manipulate and transform our lives may be dangerous. Evolutionary theory which offer to explain human origins are leading us in which directions?.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Fiona Ogilvie (565)
Friday September 15, 2017, 5:48 am
Genomics aims to define the similarities and differences between us. Genetic and stem-cell therapies promise to cure or prevent disease, and enhance bodies and brains. And the neurosciences try to predict behaviour, explain consciousness and revive the idea of essential differences between the sexes.

In the past few decades, the life sciences have been transformed into gigantic bio-technosciences, blurring the boundaries between science and technology, universities, entrepreneurial biotech companies, and Big Pharma. Knowledge has become intellectual property, taking its place within a globalised economy that stretches from the older scientific centres of Europe and America to the rising eastern giants of China, Singapore and India. The state, with its interests in surveillance and control, and the military, have also played a key role in this transformation. In its train have come new and formidable powers not only to reconstruct but to construct life. Ours is a techno-scientific world where life is both born and made. This is new territory, with new threats and promises.

Science — knowledge about the physical and biological world — might once have been seen as independent of the society and culture within which it was generated. But as early as the middle of the 19th century, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels pointed out that the knowledge produced by science served the interests and reflected the ideology of the capitalist class. In the 1930s, this analysis of science was taken up with enthusiasm by the Russian physicist Boris Hessen, whose paper ‘The Socio-Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia’ (1931) electrified the audience at the International Congress of the History of Science in London. Hessen argued that this most arcane of mathematical treatises, and the physics it formalised, were not merely the brilliant insights of an individual scientist, but a response to the needs of the rising mercantile capitalism of the 17th century.

At the "promises" of all of this is fulfilled, where do we find ourselves?

Please note, comment, and forward.

Doris F (18)
Friday September 15, 2017, 8:51 am
thank you for sharing Fiona !!

Animae C (516)
Friday September 15, 2017, 5:30 pm

TY Fiona

Janis K (126)
Saturday September 16, 2017, 11:07 am
Thanks for sharing.

Janet B (0)
Saturday September 16, 2017, 12:59 pm

Lenore K (0)
Saturday September 16, 2017, 6:31 pm

Patricia N (9)
Saturday September 16, 2017, 11:23 pm
A little bit frightening. Where will it all end? I worry for my grandchildren and great grandchildren and the world they will have.

Past Member (0)
Sunday September 17, 2017, 10:06 am

Janet B (0)
Sunday September 17, 2017, 6:12 pm

Lenore K (0)
Sunday September 17, 2017, 6:16 pm

Winn A (179)
Monday September 18, 2017, 6:58 am
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Science & Tech

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.