Start A Petition

Activists Act, Don't Wait, as Senate Holds More Hearings on Future of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"


Society & Culture  (tags: abuse, activists, americans, Civil Rights, Civil Liberties, culture, dishonesty, education, freedoms, government, law, military, politics, religion, rights, society )

Kit
- 2806 days ago - truth-out.org
Many believe they are part of a new civil rights movement. As such, they are not just stopping at one piece of legislation, but are demanding full equality under the law. And they have taken to employing an "inside-outside" strategy that, --> Please read



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B (276)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 8:58 am
Like many other pieces of legislation, the fate of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) rests in the hands of the lame-duck session of Congress.

When the Senate Armed Services Committee announced that it would conduct hearings on December 2 and 3 on a report commissioned by the Department of Defense that looks at repealing DADT - the Clinton-era policy that bans openly gay, lesbian and bisexual members from serving in the military - it was a testament to the activists who have spent months and years advancing toward this moment.

The report, a year-long study of the impact of DADT repeal on military cohesion and readiness, was compiled by the Comprehensive Review Working Group and released on November 30, in time for the Senate hearings.
DADT repeal would keep President Obama at his word and let many lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) activists check off another accomplishment on their long list of Congressional to-dos. The lame-duck session may be their last chance for at least another two years to repeal DADT, much less pass any kind of pro-LGBT legislation, Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) told the Washington Blade. Fortunately, he adds, he expects both President Obama and the Senate to block any anti-LGBT legislation from advancing, a tactic that was also used during the Clinton era.

It's a far cry from six years ago, when anti-LGBT measures like same-sex marriage were front and center of the LGBT equality debate. While the fight for same-sex marriage is hardly under covers - especially with regard to the legal wrangling surrounding California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage - many pieces of legislation backed by LGBT organizations are now garnering support among a broad group of Americans.
Though same sex marriage still divides the nation, with polls putting advocates and foes within five percent of each other, legislation like DADT is a uniting force: according to a 2008 poll, nearly 75 percent of people oppose DADT.

The unprecedented push for vote by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada), Defense Secretary Gates and President Obama to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" in the lame-duck session is a far cry from even a few weeks ago, when Democrats scapegoated LGBT voters, among other minorities, for their mid-term election losses. (Early exit polls reported that 31 percent of LGBT Americans voted for Republicans, though later analyses showed that only 29 percent of LGBT voters voted for Republicans. A Keen News Service study that looked at voting trends in predominantly LGBT neighborhoods barely saw a change in turnout over 2008 among other LGBT voters, however. Basically, this year, "We saw shifts among every demographic group toward Republicans," public opinion expert and New York University professor Patrick Egan told the Bay Area Reporter, "and gays were among them.")

Despite ridicule and numerous letdowns, LGBT activists have continued to push Obama toward his campaign platform when he has catered to the right. When activists have been displeased, they have shown it by taking to the streets, confronting politicians and even filing lawsuits when necessary. These activists are not just lamenting as they did in 2004; now, they are acting, too and the media is taking notice.

Many believe they are part of a new civil rights movement. As such, they are not just stopping at one piece of legislation, but are demanding full equality under the law. And they have taken to employing an "inside-outside" strategy that, although not uniform, has creatively combined the work of activists who work with members of Congress with the work of those known for heckling them to loosely come together for the repeal of DADT.
For example, the newly formed GetEQUAL grassroots group was created after the 2009 National Equality March, which brought together a broad array of LGBT activists from around the nation for a march on Washington, DC. While the March organizers encouraged marchers to work with Equality Across America (EAA), GetEQUAL founders Kip Williams and Robin McGehee had their own ideas. While EAA created a 435 Congressional district strategy, according to their website, both Williams and McGehee "felt that the current political window was quickly closing and that to successfully push large legislative items regional 'strike force' teams could be organized to take strategic action and apply pressure more quickly."

Since their formation, and with consultation from participants in other successful social movements, their actions have "shut down Las Vegas Boulevard, disrupted Congressional committee meetings, and heckled President Barack Obama at Democratic fund-raisers," according to The Advocate, which included the group in their "Best of 2010."

Or take Katherine Miller, an out lesbian and former West Point student who left in protest of DADT. Concerning her decision to quit, she told the AP, she had been concealing her identity and "realized that I wasn't becoming the leader of character that I wanted to be." If DADT is repealed, she recently revealed, she has her application ready to return, but until then, she is ensconced at Yale University.

While GetEQUAL and other activists work on the perimeters, many activists have taken the policy to the courts, and in light of the recent rulings on longstanding lawsuits, DADT is at its last breath. Backed by groups like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and even the Log Cabin Republicans, the movement to repeal DADT has created activists who helped push for its repeal in federal courts.

In September, the US District Court for Western Washington ordered the Air Force to reinstate a nurse, Margaret Witt, who had been discharged under DADT. While Margaret Witt's case has been appealed by the Justice Department, it has not asked for a stay in her reinstatement. Although in this case the district court merely ruled for Witt and not explicitly against DADT, the ruling was still a blow to the policy.

But the most dramatic blow came with a ruling in a case brought before federal judge Virginia Philips by the Log Cabin Republicans, a LGBT Republican group which has pushed for DADT repeal. In September, Philips ruled against the policy in a terse 85-page statement, concluding that DADT violates the Constitution. Philips ordered an immediate worldwide lift of the ban, though shortly thereafter an appeals court stalled it per the government's request.

As the Senate continues to hold hearings and the government appeals every judicial denunciation of the law, longtime activists like Alan Fann still believe that the time is right for DADT repeal. Optimistically quoting civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., he writes, "I have confidence, and am keeping my hopes up, because no matter the outcome, this will always be true: 'The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.'"
The repeal of DADT is just a priority on a long list of legal to-dos. But DADT's repeal will also show the strength of a civil rights movement that seeks what both King Jr. and Fann seek: justice.

by James Russell for truthout | news analysis
 

Kit B (276)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 9:01 am
This is about fair treatment and honesty. How can we pretend to be a country founded on the ideals of justice and individual freedoms and in ANY way find a justification for this and other policies that deny citizens their most basic of human rights?
 

Mary L (132)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 1:47 pm
Ah Kit, the senate is going to put anonymous holds until the next millennium unless all of the asshats are voted out of office. Jim "I will own de Mint," "Joh power gives me a Boehner," "Mitch I'm still Ronald McDonald," and "Michelle let's go Back-Man to the inquisition." Come to mind instantly.
 

Past Member (0)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 5:36 pm
Noted, thanks Kit. It's rather hard these days to be optimistic about anything good happening in DC.
 

Terry King (113)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 6:22 pm
I'm appalled!
 

Jeannette A (137)
Thursday December 9, 2010, 10:16 pm
This is like rape... rape is not about sex, it is about power. And denying these people their civil rights is not about their sexuality but about the power our government has over us all.
 

ewoud k (68)
Friday December 10, 2010, 4:14 am
Yesterday the Senate voted: 57 votes for repeal, 60 were needed.

When will Senate and representatives start to act and vote according to public opinion?
 

patricia lasek (317)
Friday December 10, 2010, 4:26 am
"Immediately following the vote, Senators Joe Lieberman, I-CT, and Susan Collins, R-MN, announced they would introduce standalone legislation to repeal DADT by year's end. A repeal would put an end to the controversial policy banning openly gay individuals from serving in the military.

Lieberman said via Twitter that he spoke with Sen. Harry Reid, D-NV, who indicated he would use "Rule 14" to bring the new legislation directly to the Senate floor, bypassing the approval of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Collins was the sole Republican who crossed party lines and voted "yes" to bring the defense authorization bill to debate on the Senate floor.

"There is no reason why we could not have moved to consider that bill," Collins said in a joint news conference with Sen. Joe Lieberman immediately after the authorization bill was blocked. "I am extremely disappointed with senators who walked away from negotiations in which we were engaged and which were going well."

 

Kit B (276)
Friday December 10, 2010, 4:58 am
Stand alone legislation will not be stand alone for long - these people in the Senate and House never saw a bill they could not amend. Then something will be objectionable about the amendments.

Over grown children, playing with our lives.

Our politicians are not particularly intelligent, not at all aware of life beyond their own cloistered world, and not in any way emphatic to causes or needs beyond the ones that pay for reelection. These people SUCK!!!
 

Carol H (229)
Friday December 10, 2010, 9:39 am
why are they doing this, whats in it for them to hold up the repeal???
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture





 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.