START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The "Fix" Is In: Laying Bare Some Sequester Lies -- William Rivers Pitt


Society & Culture  (tags: abuse, americans, corruption, culture, dishonesty, economics. education, ethics, family, government, law, politics, rights, safety, society, Social Security )

Kit
- 877 days ago - truth-out.org
With the sequester ax trembling over the neck of the nation, everyone in the "news" media seems desperate to toss their two cents into the well...including, apparently, some who would be wise to remain in the children's pool, lest they drown trying to-->



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (276)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 9:14 am
Photo: Chris Cillizza, writer of "The Fix" for The Washington Post, speaking at the Miller Center, May 18, 2012. (Photo: Miller Center)


With the sequester ax trembling over the neck of the nation, everyone in the "news" media seems desperate to toss their two cents into the well...including, apparently, some who would be wise to remain in the children's pool, lest they drown trying to stroke out to deeper waters. Enter Chris Cillizza, keeper of "The Fix," perhaps the most useless corner of the Washington Post next to the ink that publication sadly donates to the incoherencies of Jennifer Rubin.

Mr. Cillizza's "Fix" is the Post's failed-hipster answer to those who enjoy the vacuity of horse-race politics. For reasons passing understanding, the powers-that-be at the Post gave Cillizza an outlet to explain - ever without basis beyond his own dubious lights - who's up, who's down, who won, or lost, in any particular political situation. "The Fix" is a triumph of flash over substance, written with wanna-be-clever insider snark for those in DC who still think the internet isn't a real thing yet. Plainly put, Cillizza, as a journalist, is taken about as seriously as the vapid quislings who wait around red carpets to make fun of celebrities' outfits.

This is why Cillizza's article on Monday morning was so remarkable. The guy tasked to make obnoxious judgments on the surface of politics somehow won the chance to dabble in the depths and the details, and came off exactly as one would expect: like someone living in a bubble who would not get the point if it was nailed to his forehead.

For the record: the sequester, slated to take place on Friday, is a series of massive cuts to both the defense industry and the social contract, created as a hard deadline by a pack of Washington politicians who decided they could not get anything done unless they put calamity on their doorstep...but now that calamity is here, eager idiots like Cillizza have been stepping up to argue that the evisceration of the Federal budget is not actually a big deal. Hence, the article titled "Why We Need the Sequester" made its odious debut.

In it, Cillizza takes on the apparently-offensive poll numbers stating that Americans - gasp - enjoy the goods and services provided to them by the government they've been funding with tax revenues, and in nearly every instance want those services expanded. His take:

What those numbers make clear is that most people live in a fantasy world where overall federal spending decreases even as spending on virtually every federal program increases. Given that "reality", it's uniquely possible that only through crisis - manufactured or not - will people come to grips with the fundamental paradox at the center of their thinking of what the federal government should or shouldn't do.

Ermahgerd, what do we do? According to Cillizza, the American people are a pack of indolent, greedy layabouts living in a "fantasy" world where the social services they've paid for are not affordable.

Hm.

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, which costs around $400 billion, was recently globally grounded due to a crack in an engine fin, a new reason among many others why no one wants this plane to begin with, yet it keeps getting built. The V-22 Osprey has been killing Marines for years now, yet it also keeps getting built, to the tune of $35 billion.

Cancel these two "defense" programs that don't work and are not wanted by the service branches expected to use them, and...gosh. That's $435 billion we just saved, along with the lives of any number of servicemembers.

Two programs.

$435,000,000,000.00

Cillizza's "fundamental paradox" about what government can and cannot afford is seated firmly in the Beltway-insider lingo of what is, and is not, off limits...and "defense" spending clearly falls into the former category. Like many others, he lives in the DC bubble, and gets paid to not write about what is most important. It's a hell of a gig if you can get it, and has been making otherwise-useless writers like Cillizza rich for decades.

For the rest of us common mortals, who expect a return on our investment, we want government to help people with the money we give via taxes, as the poll numbers Cillizza condemns clearly indicate.

We are told by grifters like Cilliza that we can't have the Post Office, or decent health care, or Social Security, or Medicare, or Medicaid, and must eat cuts upon cuts to basic services because "we can't afford them." Fact: anyone who writes that crap is lying to us with their bare face hanging out, and is deliberately avoiding discussion of where most of our tax money winds up getting squandered.

We can fund the civilized society our citizens demonstrably approve of if we make some cuts to the biggest, fattest, happiest "welfare queen" on the block: the Department of "Defense."

And in the meantime, we can leave the horse-race politics to cheap fixers like Chris Cillizza, who should probably spend less time with people who think like him and more time with, well...people.

Just a thought.
****

By: William Rivers Pitt | Op Ed | Truthout |

***Truthout needs your support to produce grassroots journalism and disseminate conscientious visions for a brighter future. Contribute now by clicking here.****
 

JL A. (286)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 10:03 am
Add that cutting oil subsidies and corporate deferred interest deductions would also equate to the entire sequestration social contract cuts and you have added to the absurdity.
 

Fiona Ogilvie (1015)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 10:11 am
Sickenering and more sickenering.
 

Yvonne White (233)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 11:45 am
Common sense is not common in CONgre$$..:(
 

SuSanne P. (190)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 2:42 pm
More of the same. It is hard to have any hope things will change at this point. TY Kit.
 

Kit B. (276)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 3:09 pm

For one thing we can do without self serving crack pots like Chris Cillizza. Let's just have the FACTS, mam. Without personal embellishments.
 

Angelika R. (145)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 3:14 pm
Hmm, is that CC somehow a relative of D.O.? Where's a petition to the WaPo to "fix The Fix" ?!! Thx Kit for another great W R Pitt !
 

pam w. (139)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 3:19 pm
Thanks again, Kit...you DO find the BEST STUFF!
 

Katie D. (90)
Saturday March 9, 2013, 9:10 pm
Heaven's all the Useless and that does not work and they keep doing it! spending for things in the Military NEVER LEARN!!! and then wanting to TAKE-A-WAY our Social Security and Medicaire! Their are other places to cut!!!!
 

Jaime Alves (39)
Sunday March 10, 2013, 6:55 am
Noted, thanks.
 

Birgit W. (156)
Sunday March 10, 2013, 12:52 pm
Noted
 

Past Member (0)
Sunday March 10, 2013, 2:47 pm
No sequester, Please sign;
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/economic-and-national-security/xM2Xr5w1
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/257/834/410/economic-security/
 

Lois Jordan (60)
Sunday March 10, 2013, 3:46 pm
Noted. Thanks, Kit. Another "home-run" article by Pitt. Indeed, that DC "bubble" seems to have grown a thick coat of leather, despite the fact that Bush is gone. Those "insiders" know which side their bread is buttered, and just love sucking up to the Military-Industrial-Corporate complex.
 

Shirley B. (5)
Monday March 11, 2013, 2:37 pm
I am so grateful to be from the same gene pool as you guys.
 

Bryan S. (108)
Monday March 11, 2013, 6:08 pm
Thanks for these articles, Kit. How f'n great it is that these cuts are offered as some sort of "solution" when it was Wall St fraud that tanked the economy, corporate greed that has been gutting it for decades, and the tax rate on the top 1% is at a historic low. And as Mr. Pitt points out, we waste many billions each year on completely unecessary military spending.

Oh and don't you love how Repubs are so quick to point out that no amount of taxing the uber-wealthy will completely eliminate our debt, but when it comes to debt reduction of about the same amount by cutting programs that hurt working people, then it's FULL SPEED AHEAD! How can people have such fundamentally wrong thinking?

I saw a comment from a different article on the sequester that i thought was great and wanted to share so hear it is:



Notice that "triggers" are never used to bring into effect large scale progressive policies.

For example:

- If 10,000 people with health insurance polices go bankrupt in a single year then a single payer system is triggered.

- If the unemployment rate does not drop 2% this year then a $500 billion public works program is triggered.

- If the 100 largest corporations pay an effective tax rate below 10% in any given year an additional 10% tax is automatically triggered.

Triggers are tools to enact regressive polices allowing the political parties to avoid blame. They are weapons of mass political deception.
 

Kit B. (276)
Monday March 11, 2013, 6:29 pm

Excellent Bryan, thanks for sharing.
 

Jeremy S. (3)
Monday March 11, 2013, 6:34 pm
What Bryan said, exactly!
 

Dandelion G. (385)
Monday March 11, 2013, 9:44 pm
Why wasn't it that if they couldn't agree that we'd tax the top 2% and cuts if there wasn't a reached agreement. No it was cuts just cuts, not mention of revenue.

We were screwed again. It sounds like there was this one side this or that, but it wasn't it was cuts and more cuts.
 

Sue D. (150)
Tuesday March 12, 2013, 1:39 am
Great comments! Bryan is exactly right - if some triggers had been included that actually helped the people, the ReThugs would have found a way to suddenly become more reasonable.
 

Past Member (0)
Thursday March 14, 2013, 5:12 pm
Thanks.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.
site feedback

ONSITE FEEDBACK FORM

Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!