Start A Petition

Obama's Numbers (Quarterly Update)

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: americans, congress, corruption, democrats, dishonesty, elections, freedoms, Govtfearmongering, healthcare, media, obama, politics, propaganda, republicans )

- 1779 days ago -
From jobs to debt to oil production, what's changed since Obama took office.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 7:39 am
Image: Chart from Fact Check


Reviewing some key statistical measures of Barack Obama’s presidency so far, we find:
◾The economy has added more jobs since Obama took office than it did in his predecessor’s entire eight years in office.
◾Despite the improved economy, the number of people receiving food-stamp assistance has continued to grow, and now more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president.
◾Federal spending under Obama has grown faster than inflation, but far more slowly than it did under President Bush.
◾Federal debt held by the public has grown by 90 percent since Obama took office.
◾Obama has ordered seven times more drone strikes than Bush in the covert conflicts in Pakistan and Yemen, according to independent estimates.
◾Domestic oil production has soared; oil imports have dropped by one-third; new cars are getting 17 percent better mileage; and wind and solar power have increased 157 percent.

These are some of the insights that emerge from the first in a series of regular quarterly updates of key statistical indicators of the Obama presidency.

As with our “Obama’s Numbers” article in October, and the pre-election update we posted Nov. 5, our intent is to provide accurate measures of what’s changed — for better or worse — since Obama first took office in January 2009.
***See Chart in Full Size at VISIT SITE***


Jobs: Obama Beats Bush

Now that we have figures for the full four years of Obama’s first term, a surprising fact emerges: The economy added more jobs during four years under Obama than it did in the entire eight years under Bush.

By the time of Obama’s second inaugural in January, the economy had added a net total of 1,208,000 jobs since he was first sworn in four years earlier, according to current figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That beats George W. Bush’s eight-year total of 1,083,000.

And so far, Obama is extending his lead over Bush. Counting jobs added in February, his total now stands at a net gain of over 1.5 million jobs.

Neither president’s record is good by historical standards, especially when compared with the 22.8 million jobs added during Bill Clinton’s eight years in office. The Bush years were hampered by a recession and prolonged job slump that began within weeks of his taking office in 2001, and later by the devastating recession of 2007-2009.

The economy lost 8.7 million jobs as a result of the 2007-2009 recession, the worst since the Great Depression of the 1930s. Those losses included 4.4 million jobs lost during Bush’s final year, and another 4.3 million during Obama’s first 13 months in office. But since then, all the jobs initially lost under Obama have been regained, plus another 1,564,000.

A note of caution: Figures are subject to later revision as the Bureau of Labor Statistics continues to refine them. Job gains under Obama turned out to be somewhat larger than reported initially after the BLS completed its annual “benchmark” corrections, for example. Also, figures for February and March are still “preliminary” and could be revised — up or down — when the April figures are released in May.

Unemployment Rate: Still High

Despite the job gains, the unemployment rate remains high by historical standards. It was 7.6 percent in March, which is 0.2 percentage points lower than when Obama took office in 2009. But it was still well above the 5.3 percent average monthly unemployment rate during the Bush years, or the under 5.2 percent average for the years when Bill Clinton was president.

Worse, economists expect the jobless rate to remain high for years to come. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, for one, predicts that the rate will remain above 7.5 percent through next year. “If that happens, 2014 will be the sixth consecutive year with unemployment exceeding 7-½ percent of the labor force — the longest such period in the past 70 years,” CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf stated in Senate testimony Feb. 25.

Modest Inflation, Stagnant Wages

Inflation has remained modest, but wages have remained stagnant during Obama’s presidency. As of the release of March figures on April 16, the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers had risen 9.6 percent since Obama first took office.

Wages, however, have not quite kept up with the rise in the price of consumer goods. The BLS reported that “real” average weekly earnings for rank-and-file workers, as measured by the monthly national payroll survey, had actually declined 0.2 percent over Obama’s time in office.

Stock Market

Stock prices, which plunged during the 2007-2009 recession, have continued to rebound since our last report. As of the market’s close on April 16, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index stood 96 percent above where it was when the president first came to office in 2009, and very close to the record high set in October 2007. The Dow Jones Industrial Average had gone up 86 percent. Both the Dow and the S&P 500 have set record highs in recent days.

The NASDAQ Composite index had more than doubled — closing on April 16 at 127 percent higher than it was when Obama was first inaugurated — but was still short of the record the tech-heavy index set in 2000 before the dot-com bubble burst.

Federal Debt: Nearly Doubled

The federal debt has risen even more since our initial reports. During the four years of Obama’s first term, the debt owed to the public rose 83.5 percent. And it has continued to rise during the first weeks of his second term. As of April 15, it stood 90 percent higher than it did when Obama took office in 2009.

Total federal debt — counting intergovernmental borrowings, such as the Social Security trust funds — rose by nearly 55 percent during the first term, and is now 58 percent higher than it was on Jan. 20, 2009, when Obama was first sworn in.

But at least the red ink is accumulating a bit more slowly. CBO estimates the current fiscal year (which ends Sept. 30) will see a deficit of $845 billion — the first time in five years that the yearly shortfall will be below $1 trillion. That assumes that current law remains in place, including the automatic spending cuts that began to take effect March 1. Or, alternatively, that Congress implements different spending cuts of the same amount.

Federal Spending

For all the talk of spending “cuts,” the fact is that spending by the federal government has continued to rise under Obama. But it has gone up far less rapidly than it did under Bush.

The Office of Management and Budget projects federal spending in the current fiscal year (which ends Sept. 30) to be just under $3.7 trillion — or 4 percent more than it was in 2012.

By our calculations, spending has risen a total of 11.2 percent since Obama first took office — counting $203 billion in new spending added under Obama in fiscal 2009. That’s the most we figure Obama can fairly be credited with adding to the FY2009 spending levels he inherited from Bush after he took office nearly four months into the fiscal year. For details on how we arrived at that figure, see our June 4 “Obama’s Spending” article.

By comparison, federal outlays increased by 33 percent in Bush’s first term (comparing actual spending for fiscal 2005 with that for fiscal 2001, which was the last year for which Bill Clinton set spending levels). And spending rose another 34 percent in Bush’s final term, even after subtracting Obama’s $203 billion from fiscal 2009.

As we pointed out in our June article, one Republican analyst has credited Obama with adding somewhat less spending than we do to Bush’s fiscal 2009 levels. So it could be argued that spending rose a bit more in Bush’s last term, and has risen a bit less since then, than our figures indicate. But even so, federal spending rose at least three times faster under Bush than it has so far under Obama.

Food Stamps

The rise in food-stamp recipients has continued despite the improving economy. What Newt Gingrich claimed — prematurely — during his 2012 presidential campaign has now come true: More persons have been added to the food-stamp rolls under Obama than under any single previous president.

As of January, the most recent month for which the Department of Agriculture has released figures, nearly 47.8 million persons were receiving aid through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. That’s a rise of nearly 15.8 million under Obama, more than the 14.7 million that were added during Bush’s eight years in office.

The total is now 49 percent higher than when Obama first took office, and 3 percentage points higher than it was when we issued our first “Obama’s Numbers” scorecard last year, based on figures from July.

The average monthly benefit was $274.04 per household as of January, and the program is distributing over $6.3 billion per month in benefits.

Oil Production and Imports

What Obama’s 2008 opponent advocated — “Drill, baby, drill” — has come to pass. Whether that’s because of Obama’s policies or in spite of them is something we won’t attempt to assess here, as it’s a matter of opinion. But the facts are that U.S. oil drilling has increased, production has surged, and imports have dropped dramatically.

Figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration reveal that the number of oil and gas drilling rigs operating in January was 13.1 percent higher than during the same month four years earlier, when Obama was sworn in.

Meanwhile, U.S. crude oil production was 29.4 percent higher in 2012 than it was in 2008, the year before Obama took office. And the net amount of oil and other petroleum products imported from abroad has fallen by almost exactly one-third — 33.3 percent — between 2008 and 2012.

U.S. dependency on foreign oil peaked at just over 60 percent in 2005 after decades of increase. (See Table 3.3a in the most recent EIA Monthly Energy Review, under “net imports as share of products supplied.”) But in Bush’s last few years that figure began to edge downward, reaching 57 percent in 2008.

The trend has accelerated dramatically since Obama took office, and oil dependency was down to just below 40 percent for all of last year. EIA preliminary figures show the dependency on foreign oil was below 36 percent for the first two months of 2013.

Wind and Solar Power

The amount of electricity generated from wind and solar power has now increased 157 percent since the year before Obama took office, according to the latest figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Wind and solar still account for only a small fraction of all electricity, but the share has more than doubled. It has grown from 1.4 percent of all electricity in 2008 to 3.6 percent during the 12 months ending in January, the most recent period for which EIA gives figures.

We note here that the trend upward also predates Obama’s tenure. Wind and solar power increased 282 percent during Bush’s last four years in office, for example. But the subsidies provided in Obama’s 2009 stimulus package helped keep the trend going.

Fuel Economy

The president can rightly claim that he has doubled the fuel mileage that government standards will require automakers to achieve by 2025, when the standard for light trucks and cars will reach 54.5 miles per gallon. But what’s been achieved so far in the real world is more modest.

According to the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute, the average EPA city/highway sticker mileage of light duty vehicles sold in March was 24.6 miles per gallon. That’s a record. And it’s 17 percent better than the 21.0 mpg for vehicles sold in January 2009, when Obama first took office.

Gasoline Prices

Gasoline prices — not included in our graphic — have remained volatile, but have yet to equal the record $4.11 national average price for regular that was seen in July 2008.

The price when Obama first took office was an unusually low $1.85 per gallon, held down by the worldwide economic recession he inherited. It later more than doubled to a high of $3.97, in May 2011. Last week it was $3.54, an increase of 92 percent since he first took office, but still well short of the record.


Reliable figures on illegal immigration and border enforcement are hard to come by. The U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency reports that it deported 409,849 individuals in fiscal 2012, an increase of 11 percent over the total for the same period four years earlier (fiscal 2008, the last full fiscal year completed under Bush). But the reported increases under Obama have been the subject of dispute. The Washington Post reported that the Obama administration inflated the deportation numbers in fiscal 2010. Numbers USA, a group urging stricter controls on immigration, and Republican Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas have accused ICE of continuing to inflate the figures. ICE did not return our phone calls or respond to requests for clarification and for more up-to-date monthly figures.

One figure we deemed solid enough to include in our graphic is the number of border patrol agents, which increased 6.3 percent between fiscal 2009 (for which Bush was mostly responsible) and last fiscal year. In essence, Bush roughly doubled the number of agents, and Obama has maintained and even slightly increased that high level, at least until the recent automatic budget cuts, which may cause some agents to be furloughed.

Drone Strikes and Military Fatalities

According to figures we obtained from the Department of Defense, a total of 263 U.S. military personnel died in the Iraq war after 2008. Obama withdrew all U.S. forces from that country in December 2011.

Meanwhile, he increased the number of troops in Afghanistan, where 1,564 U.S. military men and women have died since 2008.

And he dramatically increased the use of covert, remote-controlled drones and missiles to attack targets in Pakistan and Yemen. No official figures are available, and for a time the Obama administration would not even publicly admit that such CIA-controlled attacks were taking place.

But an independent estimate by the nonpartisan New America Foundation, based on what it deems to be “credible news reports,” puts the number of attacks at 374 since Obama took office, an increase of 665 percent over the number that took place while Bush was in office. Estimates by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in Britain, while slightly different, give a similar picture.

Tax Rates

Obama was first elected in 2008 on a promise not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year in family income. That’s a promise he’s fulfilled with only minor exceptions, such as a 10 percent tax on tanning salons included in the Affordable Care Act. Meanwhile, his 2009 stimulus package delivered temporary tax cuts for most working people, and for all of 2011 and 2012, he secured a 2 percentage point reduction in the Social Security payroll tax.

For his entire first term, the federal income tax cuts signed by Bush in 2001 and 2003 remained in effect, with no increase on anyone. As of 2013, a result of the “fiscal cliff” deal struck with House Republicans at the end of last year, the top income tax rate will go up by 4.6 percentage points, to 39.6 percent — the same top rate that applied during Clinton’s administration.

The new top rate only applies to family income over $450,000, or single income over $400,000. Income under those limits will be taxed at the same rates set by the Bush tax legislation, plus a bit more in many cases.

Persons with more than $250,000 in family income (and singles with over $200,000 income) also face some additional taxes under the Affordable Care Act, including an additional 3.8 percent tax on net “investment income” and a 0.9 percent add-on Medicare tax on payroll income exceeding $200,000. Both of those new taxes took effect Jan. 1.

We’ll file our next quarterly update on statistics reflecting the Obama presidency in early June.
***All sources used for compilation of information listed in detail at bottom of article (VISIT SITE)

– by Brooks Jackson | Fact Check | Annenberg Foundation

jan b (5)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 7:45 am
Florida, who experienced a terrible real-estate market real estate market is really going great now.
We are finally digging ourselves out of the hole without the help of the GOP in congress. In fact, they are manufacturing scandals because the only way they believe they can take control again is not by bragging about their past failures between 2001-2009 when they ran everything into the ground. But by FOX TV replaying all the MAYBE's and COULD BE and hammering it in nearly 24/7.

JL A (281)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 8:41 am
Very important data that too many pundits, voters and media outlets are ignoring as they continue to make claims at odds with the data.

Janelle Wong (71)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 8:58 am
Of course the jobs number should be much higher given the high level of unemployment over a much longer period. No surprise there.

Kit B (276)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 11:39 am

Oh how lucky we are, the man/woman Janelle/Hans/Lilith/ Paul B etc ad nuaseam is back.

Kit B (276)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 11:40 am

*ad nauseam ---

JL A (281)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 11:58 am
I did speak of how the pundits, who all too often are misinformed and thus misuse data and draw erroneous conclusions, have been ignoring this very important data...heavy sigh

Janelle Wong (71)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 12:24 pm
This is the problem with reporting such cursory statistics. As an example, one reason that the food stamp statistic is so high is that the "underemployment" rate is currently 13.8 percent and long term unemployment/underemployment is epidemic.

Jae A (316)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 12:36 pm
California got ride of the Republicons and took control over our state government and we are now in recovery...a surplus at that...and the housing market is bouncing back. Jobs seem to be holding and more added monthly etc.
It appears that what is needed are less GOPers in political offices ..which of course is no surprise to many of us.

Kit B (276)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 12:39 pm

Nothing cursory about these statistics, they are clearly and factually representing the past quarter. Read more slowly.

JL A (281)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 1:00 pm
No ethical research professional would ever deem validated, reliable indicators like these to be cursory.

JL A (281)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 1:06 pm
Oops! Forgot to add that Jae is completely right and to add that the jobs creation, unlike in TX and other GOP strongholds, include a lot of well paying jobs in the green energy sector rather than minimum wage jobs.

Billie C (2)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 7:37 pm
now if he would stop taking our rights and stomping them in the ground. he's worse than bush at removing our rights and even has goons in other areas to help him out.

JL A (281)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 8:21 pm
I had hoped for an on-topic comment to respond to--can't find anything in the last post that links in any actual or factual way to the content of this post.

Yvonne White (229)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 9:57 pm
Just think what Could happen if RepubliCONS would allow a JOBs Bill to pass! But they won't because that would Help American families, the Economy in general, and safe-guard Social Security from attempts at we get piddling jobs at Wal-Mart & CONvenience Stores & WallStreet gets richer while we get poorer..:( Wish Obama would use those drones on CONgre$$!

Jason R (67)
Sunday June 9, 2013, 10:06 pm
The housing market is fueled by investors that will rent them. Not good. The rich are further eroding the american dream.

Robert K (31)
Monday June 10, 2013, 5:49 am
44 filibusters against the jobs bills passed by the Pelosi House is why the employment numbers aren't better. Republican policies are responsible for nearly every single problem we have. Of course, the failure to veto Gramm-Leach-Bliley and the repeal of Glass-Steagall and backing NAFTA and CAFTA were bad things done by Clinton, and continuing Bush policies by Obama are Democratic blunders, but the fact remains that all of these damages to our country were originally catsed by Republicans.

Without scumbag corporate donors and a Republican party, the USA could and would be what we falsely clim to be, the number 1 country on Earth instead of what we are, number 16.

paul m (93)
Monday June 10, 2013, 6:32 am


Arielle S (313)
Monday June 10, 2013, 6:38 am
Thank you for some actual facts, Kit - we can only imagine how much more good could have come from the Obama administration if he was not dealing with obstructionists, racists, and morons. It would also help if we had more Democrats with backbones. And John, if there is finger-pointing and blaming, it's for good reason. Can you name one thing the Republicans have done in the last 4 years that was positive and good?

Carlene V (202)
Monday June 10, 2013, 7:45 am
You won't see this report on faux noise that's for sure. When and if the thugs in the Republican party quit whoring themselves out to corporate pimps and phony Christains things could change. They'll spent their time and our tax dollars trying for a 39th time to repeal Obamacare. Heck, if that is a success what will they tell all the dumbed down voters who eagerly await their next lie?

Tim M (0)
Monday June 10, 2013, 8:19 am
wow... you guys are the part of love.... I was going to post some information I had found on where job growth was according to several different sources. I choose to look as minimum of 5 reporting agencies then I can get somewhat an average medium and closer to what may be actuality. However after reading some of the post and all the name calling I think I will just let all the haters have this page. Have a great day.

Jae A (316)
Monday June 10, 2013, 9:21 am
Sure you were ...'Tim' ...[wink wink nod nod].
"Haters" you say Tim...Hummm....You talk about the name calling being the reason for you not posting all that info you say you found and what do you end your comment name calling. That leaves me to believe that you came to the thread just to call people haters nothing more...but correct me if I'm wrong...Maybe leave a comment that doesn't enclude name calling via yourself ...?
It'd be a friendly /love gesture I think.. if you would filled out your profile...seems you joined in 2011 and haven't taken the time to do that.....or is it 'the haters' that kept you from doing that also? Just curious 'Tim',nothiung more.

Nancy M (197)
Monday June 10, 2013, 9:46 am
Excellent article Kit. And I can see how it is spinning. You know....

Kit B (276)
Monday June 10, 2013, 9:49 am

Thanks Jae and Nancy - Yep, I know.

JL A (281)
Monday June 10, 2013, 12:53 pm
Thanks Kit for presenting the validated sources which met statistical reliability testing standards that all who value accuracy use as what they are willing to report.

Lily T. (8)
Monday June 10, 2013, 10:16 pm
When we see this administration that ran on hope, change, transparency and accountability justify the gross violations of the constitutional rights of its populace as demonstrated in the past week, I think "Houston, we have a problem". I have, for quite some time, see nothing good coming out of this administration. We are flying over countries who we are not at war with and arbitrarily killing people whose name we don't even know and obviously don't even care. We have a agency whose sole purpose was to provide intelligence on foreign subjects, spying on American citizens all in the name of the "War on Terror" which is a war, they themselves created and perpetuate.

I am really tired of the GOP and Tea Party whose nonsense is so crazy that it distracts us from the real issues at hand. I am tired of people defending the indefensible. I think that Democrats, who consider themselves as progressive and liberal leaning to imagine that the most recent scandal(s) was under a Republican and gauge their outrage before defending Obama with excuses like "the GOP are obstructionists" or "Bush started it", etc. The best one is always "we'll look at Bush/Cheney". Do we really want to hold the person we supported to an equal or marginally higher bar? Not me, I hold people that I support to a higher bar. That's why I support them in the first place. I think hold the bar higher for those we oppose ideologically than we do from ourselves, is sheer hypocrisy.

The line in the sand that ones draws and will not cross has become increasingly elastic. The rights and liberties hard fought for and now subverted will be almost impossible to force into retreat. The things that have been done under this Administration makes Bush/Cheney's crap look like child's play. We have allowed things no so long ago we couldn't imagine become the norm.

I know that I no longer can defend the indefensible.

Tim M (0)
Tuesday June 11, 2013, 6:21 am
JAE A. oh great and wise one....Sure you were ...'Tim' ...[wink wink nod nod].

"Haters" you say Tim...Hummm... READ ALL THE ABOVE POST!!!.

You talk about the name calling being the reason for you not posting all that info you say you found and what do you end your comment name calling. (NEVER NAMED CALLED I SAID LET ALL THE HATERS HAVE IT) (WHICH BY THE WAY THE PROGRESSIVES ARE THE ONES THAT COINED THE PHRASE HATERS, JUST THAT ALL THE VILE IS SPILLED ON THE PROGRESSIVE SIDE)

That leaves me to believe that you came to the thread just to call people haters nothing more...but correct me if I'm wrong...Maybe leave a comment that doesn't enclude name calling via yourself ...? (ANYONE WITH A COMPUTER CAN RESEARCH ANY OF 3 DOZEN SITES WITH STATICS. WITH AT LEAST 5 BEING INDEPENDENT)

It'd be a friendly /love gesture I think.. if you would filled out your profile...seems you joined in 2011 and haven't taken the time to do that.....or is it 'the haters' that kept you from doing that also? Just curious 'Tim',nothiung more. (WHY IS A PROFILE SO IMPORTANT TO YOU, SOME CUTE FUZZY PIC MY DOG, HORSE... HMMM... MAYBE ME KNITTING. INFORMATION THAT HAS NO BEARING ON A LOGICAL DISCUSSION. HMMM. CLARIFY FOR ME. WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MY COLLEGE DEGREES? OR MAYBE YOU WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT BUSINESS I OWN OR OWNED. YOU KNOW THE ONES THAT I BUILT!!!)

OR MAYBE its because I do not care about profiles. Besides would that not be PROFILING. aaaa.. and no I am not a Republican, or a Demacrack. I am a Libertarian. Free thinking, dont need to "follow" capable of making my own mind doing research that is not based on one or several peoples one sided point of view. Have a great day!

JL A (281)
Tuesday June 11, 2013, 8:22 am
Just because it was posted doesn't give it any credibility or validity--unlike the numbers in this post that have been vetted by the top experts with the skills to do so. Jae has sufficient knowledge of research to know that, as do most who commented here.

When it is data, appropriate research and skills to use appropriately is requisite for source credibility.

Kit B (276)
Tuesday June 11, 2013, 8:33 am

Or maybe Jae just trolled the articles at Care2 looking for you Tim, Oops! Nope that was you.

I'm sure it has nothing to do with Jae being a friend and after reading that prattle felt a need to remark about such nonsense.

This article contains factual information. No one is forced to read it or believe what it states. Though if one makes the choice to argue the point they should be ready with solid facts that dispute those given.

I don't care what your political affiliation might be, Care2 is a site that allows people from many different back grounds and influences to share ideas.

As for a logic discussion from you, we are still waiting for that to show up.

Jason R (67)
Wednesday June 12, 2013, 10:10 am
People like Tim are so ignorant that they don't even know how transparent they are.

Haters? Isn't that just how the fox crowd works? They foster hate of democrats 24/7 and when they are called on it, they childishly turn it around and pile on the BS.

One thing that is becoming constant is right wingers afraid to declare that they are. Chicken, lazy and ill informed, all rolled up into their protective bubble. They call themselves patriots!
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.