Start A Petition

Overeducated, Underemployed and in Debt: What Now?

Society & Culture  (tags: abuse, americans, culture, dishonesty, education, ethics, freedoms, government, media, politics, rights, safety, society )

- 1723 days ago -
"The present generation is the richest generation." At least in broad strokes, that statement has been more or less continuously true throughout history.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 7:50 am
Image Credit: Graduation money via Shutterstock

“The present generation is the richest generation.” At least in broad strokes, that statement has been more or less continuously true throughout history.

You may ask why I give the qualification “broad strokes.”

Well, though there has been a general trend upwards in standard of living — albeit with plenty of dips now and again — this trend only affects the average person, and sometimes the average person doesn’t resemble anyone you know. In fact, not only are there huge class disparities in Western nations today, there are also generational disparities. Middle-class individuals in their 20s and 30s are facing a perfect storm of a tough job market, higher student debt and brutal housing prices.

(See Video at VISIT SITE)

The Generation Squeeze campaign, led by UBC professor Paul Kershaw, is intended to shine a light on this inequity and, ultimately, help to mitigate it.

This isn’t a war of the generations, and I hope nobody sees it that way. I’m very pleased that members of my family who have worked hard all their lives are reaching pension age, seeing an increase in their home values and generally feeling secure. It makes me happy to worry less about my extended family financially. Likewise, I know how glad they would be to reduce my mortgage to something more manageable.

However, there is a disparity and it’s far from abstract. So many individuals my age are underemployed; I worry that the word will lose meaning and simply become the new normal for young workers.

When my cohort completed teacher training a scant six years ago, my fellow new educators and I had in mind a fairly predictable and safe career path. Some of us would be employed immediately, while some of us might have to work as substitute teachers for the first year, or, at most, two. By 2013, we thought we should all be well established with full-time work, the security of a permanent contract (a.k.a. tenure) and our preferred assignments.

Instead, one friend of mine has become a professional substitute, coaching for the schools he works at regularly and working a second job at night since his daily pay is less than half of what a salaried teacher would make. Another is forced to leave his wife and son for months at a time, taking term jobs at remote northern towns for months at a time — an information age equivalent of the migrant farm worker. Another left teaching to work at a dairy, and she has been the most successful of all. Each of us has multiple degrees, but that doesn’t mean as much as it used to.

Of course, unemployment and underemployment are a concern in most any field you care to mention. I know an experienced accountant who has been forced to take work as a payroll clerk, an apprentice electrician who works in the wash bay of an automotive garage and an MBA grad who works as a receptionist. The list goes on.

Most of us entering the work force in the last decade have since severely altered our salary and work environment expectations. We’ve written before about the exploitive unpaid internships desperate candidates sign up for.

Meanwhile, there’s still all that student debt, soaring housing costs and rent is climbing to match. Many individuals are putting off having children, waiting for a financial stability that may not even be achievable. It’s true that some things are cheaper than they used to be. Our parents never had iPhones, and if they were around, they would have been exorbitantly expensive. However, Gen Squeeze’s Kerhsaw also makes the point that time is money, and staying afloat costs us the time we need to raise a family as well.

Are there any silver linings to all this? Perhaps a few. People are hurting and perhaps that means they’ll be more politically involved, which tends to make elected representatives more accountable. An educated and aware populace is necessary for effective democracy, and getting engaged is a first step in that.

It’s harder to raise a family, but overpopulation is linked to many of our economic, political and environmental problems. There are a myriad of other issues at play here, but to some extent, at least, delaying and therefore having smaller families is a good thing.

Gen X and Y are fast becoming the most capable, creative, entrepreneurial group of people in generations. If the job market weren’t so tough, my CV probably wouldn’t be nearly so impressive. A diverse array of skills in a population that has learned to be fearless in their career adventures might well benefit those fields, and society in general.

The only constant in life is change. To some degree, there’s a privilege in living through a period of uncertainty. We know this is a time that will one day be in history textbooks, and we have the chance to get a little stronger.

There are limits though. We still need to make a living.

By Joel Boyce, Care2 | Op-Ed | Truthout |

JL A (281)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 7:52 am
Today's version of indentured servitude--only this one if expected to last most of a lifetime at a minimum.

Past Member (0)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 8:56 am
I imagine the military industrial complex will be hiring soon. Otherwise, the creative minds need to find ways ti bypass the traditional capitalist economy and find cooperative models of survival and success,

Vallee R (280)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 11:44 am
My extended family really only includes my daughter and her 3 kids - she is lucky with a GED to have a good job - and gets child support - but the kids are all in activities and need school supplies and clothes and let's not forget food - who pays for all this - not the dad - though he does continue to make her life hell - another story - my point is - it is difficult for the "average" person to make it these days - and "average" has changed definition. Even when I was teaching in Los Angeles my daughter qualified for some Medicaid - WTF - then I moved to New Mexico and they wanted to pay me less than 1/2 of what I was making in LA to teach as a blingual teacher - the more you help - the less you get paid -

If you make some money - you don't qualify for any help - Medicaid food stamps etc.... and if you make a bit less you do - somehow I just don't get it - my friend gets about $840 a week for disability and $16 in foodstamps - try living on that -

Vallee R (280)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 12:00 pm
Wops - that was suppose to read $840 a month - and no kids - just him.

Sheryl G (363)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 1:00 pm
I see a problem in this that I know has been trying to play out here, pitting the generations against each other with the cutting back Social Security on those who are trying to live on it today with the inflation taking larger bites out of it, but telling the youth if the Elders don't sacrifice there will not be Social Security for them.

A lot of the over 45 and just hitting 65 have had the floor ripped out from under them. The housing equity has dropped, a lot of them have had to draw out their savings to stay afloat from the job layoffs, their IRA's and 401k's tapped, Pensions disappearing, many can't find work, if they do it's far lower in pay they use to have.

The youth are struggling in many ways, but I don't like this message the way it's portrayed. It fails to take into account why this changed from the previous generation to the ones just starting off today and it misses the who generation that exists between 45 and 65. What happened to them was tragic and isn't even mentioned.

Lois Jordan (63)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 5:35 pm
Thanks for posting, Kit. Yes, this is extremely depressing. I believe that nearly everyone who isn't a member of the 1%-ers club is struggling. While some still have jobs and enough income to pay expenses, those dollars are paying for so much less. The 20-somethings (can't remember the slang term for their generation...millenials?) are so much worse off than we were at that age. We need some big, broad immediate changes here...and with the do-nothing Congress we have, I don't expect much, but will keep pressing.

Sheila D (194)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 6:50 pm
You work all those years, paying into Social Security and now Congress tells us we can't have our own money...something's so very wrong and it's almost at the point of no return. We'll be so far down there will be no getting up - then end up warehoused in privatized nursing homes. Scary.

Phillipa W (199)
Saturday September 7, 2013, 9:33 am
well I don't think it's been normal in Western culture to be living with your parents in your 30's, after having children etc due to economic circumstances or difficulties securing a house...
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.