START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Lost Microbes Are Eroding Amazon's Ability to Capture Carbon


Science & Tech  (tags: ancient, discovery, Earth Science, environment, investigation, Rain Forest, research, scientists, Trees )

Kit
- 340 days ago - livescience.com
Beneath the lush forests of the Amazon is a whole different level of diversity that new research says may be one of the keys to understanding how to stem the global impacts of deforestation.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (276)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 8:28 am
Photo Credit: Jorge Rodrigues


Beneath the lush forests of the Amazon is a whole different level of diversity that new research says may be one of the keys to understanding how to stem the global impacts of deforestation.

The Amazon rainforest is known as one of Earthís hotspots for diversity. It contains at least 40,000 plant species, 5,500 animal species and 100,000 insect species. These have been a great source for the discovery of new medicines, with at least 120 approved for use. Despite its great plant and animal diversity, it is one of the least understood ecosystems for its microbial diversity. There are 100 million microorganisms in a single gram of forest soil, making them the largest repository in the world of novel genes.

These microbes are essential to nutrient recycling. They decompose dead organic matter, through a process called mineralisation, releasing mineral nutrients that plants absorb through their roots, allowing the forest to grow. As trees grow, they capture carbon dioxide from the air through the process of photosynthesis, and, in the Amazon, this process occurs at impressive levels. Owing to its size, the forest absorbs 1.5 billion tons of CO2 from the atmosphere every year Ė making it the largest terrestrial sink of this greenhouse gas.

Large amounts of nitrogen are needed to achieve the Amazonís role as a carbon sink. In the rainforest, that comes primarily from the natural process of nitrogen fixation performed by microbes called diazotrophs. They break apart molecules of nitrogen that is essential for all living things. But, up until now, no one has looked at how the function of these microbes changes when a rainforest is converted to a pasture, something that is happening at an alarming rate in many parts of the Amazon.

In work published in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology, we found a surprisingly large shift in microbial community composition when rainforests became pastures, confirming earlier studies. This may have major implication on how nutrients are cycled in the new ecosystem.

Any changes to the nitrogen cycle are likely to affect the carbon cycle and the forestís capacity to sequester carbon dioxide. The process of deforestation is causing an addition of 1.6 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere per year, substantially increasing greenhouse gases.

While these findings reinforce the toll deforestation is having, they also offer some hope.

Our examination revealed that approximately 50% of Amazonís abandoned pastures are going through secondary forest formation. It is a process that happens mostly by chance, and when it happens diazotrophic communities tend to return to similar composition of the former forest.

The results imply that there is still time to conserve the immense genetic diversity of microbes as sources of new antibiotics and absorbers of carbon dioxide. Also, using our results, we can start devising new methods to aid the recovery of disturbed ecosystems Ė imagine a cocktail of microbes added for ecosystem restoration.

If nothing else, our research makes one thing clear: in the Amazon, the invisible microbes do as much as the now-disappearing trees to help our environment.
****

By: Jorge Rodrigues | Op-Ed | Live Science |

Jorge Rodrigues receives funding from US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Energy/Joint Genome Institute.

This article was originally published at The Conversation. Read the original article. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. This version of the article was originally published on Live Science.
 

Veronique L. (215)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 8:48 am
Noted Kit, thanks
 

JL A. (276)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 9:34 am
Sounds hopeful if enough reforestation occurs (a big if). Sounds sort of like the details in an article posted elsewhere on C2 about how certain fungi enhance the nitrogen part of the equation.
 

Roger Garin-michaud (113)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 11:55 am
noted, thanks
 

Birgit W. (152)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 1:22 pm
Thanks Kit.
 

Nancy M. (202)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 2:42 pm
Three cheers for bacteria!
 

Dandelion G. (384)
Tuesday January 14, 2014, 4:10 pm
Like the American Indian the Indigenous of the rain forest understood such things. Is funny, not until it's "proven" by the so called "civilized" world are these things suddenly "known". The same "civilized" world that is destroying everything faster and faster all the time.
 

Sergio Padilla (62)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 10:49 am
Thanks
 

Kamia T. (82)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 4:44 pm
If we would only begin to LISTEN to indigenous peoples who have lived in their habitat forever, and pay attention to all of the animals, plants and even insects. They're easily able to tell us what works and what doesn't. We're so arrogant to assume that we ALWAYS know better than people who have lived in the area forever.
 

Franck R. (54)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 6:38 pm
Thanks
 

DaleLovesOttawa O. (192)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 8:27 pm
Fascinating article, very important information and Indigenous peoples must be listened to.
 

Fi T. (16)
Thursday January 16, 2014, 4:51 am
When can the human stop deteriorating their homeland?
 

Winn Adams (203)
Thursday January 16, 2014, 6:15 pm
Why we don't listen to the people who have lived there for years is beyond me. Who would know better than all of them?
 

Carmen S. (616)
Saturday January 18, 2014, 12:49 pm
Thanks Kit
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.