Start A Petition

Chicago Residents Rebel Against Koch Brothers and Rahm Emanuel Over Petroleum Coke Hazard

Environment  (tags: americans, Chicago, climate-change, CO2emissions, coke by products destruction, ecosystems, environment, globalwarming, habitatdestruction, healthconditions, humans, Medical issues, politics, pollution, research, science )

- 1580 days ago -
The Koch brothers are benefiting from the Alberta tar sands operation big time as they amass mountains of a byproduct -- petroleum coke -- to sell overseas.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Friday January 24, 2014, 6:50 am
Photo Credit: Fuzzytek

The Koch brothers are benefitting from the Alberta tar sands operation big time as they amass mountains of a byproduct -- petroleum coke -- to sell overseas.

As with many toxic industries, the Koch brothers are locating storage large storage piles of “petcoke” in poor down-on-their-heels neighborhoods. This first came to notice in Detroit, where the Kochs were storing the hazardous material -- in open air -- along the Detroit River until ships could transport it overseas (particularly to China).

As EcoNews reported last year:

-- The New York Times is reporting about a growing, dirty side effect of refining tar sands bitumen from Canada. The evidence is on clear display as a black mountain piles up alongside the Detroit River, thanks in part to Charles and David Koch.

“Assumption Park gives residents of this city lovely views of the Ambassador Bridge and the Detroit skyline. Lately they’ve been treated to another sight: a three-story pile of petroleum coke covering an entire city block on the other side of the Detroit River. Detroit’s ever-growing black mountain is the unloved, unwanted and long overlooked byproduct of Canada’s oil sands boom,” says the article, “A Black Mound of Canadian Oil Waste Is Rising Over Detroit.”

The toxic mountain of petroleum coke, or petcoke, is like coal but dirtier, and is being sold by Koch Carbon to fuel the coal plants of countries like China. “The coke [in Detroit] comes from a refinery alongside the river owned by Marathon Petroleum, which has been there since 1930. But it began refining exports from the Canadian oil sands—and producing the waste that is sold to Koch—only in November."---

A study from Oil Change International earlier this year details just how dangerous petcoke is to the environment.

---A similar storage hazard exists on Chicago's struggling Southwest Side, along the Calumet River. Many residents are revolting against Mayor Rahm Emanuel's proposed industry friendly regulations and support a ban on open storage of petroleum coke (a move opposed by Emanuel).---

According to a January 14 article in Midwest Energy News (MEN):

---At a public hearing Monday night, local residents made clear that they don’t trust the City Council or Mayor Rahm Emanuel to take meaningful action on the issue.

They think the city’s proposed storage regulations – crafted by the public health department at the mayor’s behest — would allow piles of petcoke to keep growing and polluting in their neighborhood....

Emanuel last month rejected the idea of a citywide ban on petcoke storage, saying a state or federal solution is needed.---

In supporting the pollution for profit policies of the Koch Brothers, Emanuel is continuing his nearly unbroken record of being the mayor not of the people, but of corporate interests.

One resident describe Emanuel's favored aldermanic proposal as being like Swiss Cheese, “rife with holes.”

Of a possible restriction to let only small companies store the petroleum coke in open air mounds, another neighborhood advocate complained, according to MEN:

“The Koch brothers will create 10 smaller companies tomorrow and spread it all along the river,” said Carl Camacho, 33, who has lived his entire life in the neighborhood.

“Do they know how wind works?” added Bautista after the hearing. “Those barriers won’t do anything.”

Critics also blasted the fact that the regulations would be crafted and enforced by the city’s health department, which is already considered under-staffed and resource-strapped. The environment department was eliminated in 2011.

Of course, although not one local Chicagoan supported the Emanuel “plan,” “representatives of the Koch subsidiary KCBX and the Illinois Chamber of Commerce criticized the regulations as too stringent.”

Emanuel lives in a comfortable, leafy residential northern neighborhood far from the Koch brothers storage site. His wife and children are not impacted in any way by the petcoke swirling on the Southwest Side of the city. And we suspect that no industry executives live in the Calumet River area. As MEN documents:

--"The fight over petcoke taps into a larger ongoing struggle on the far southeast side. This was once the thrumming hub of the region’s steel industry, with up to 40,000 people employed in well-paying union jobs. The mills closed in the 1980s and 1990s, other industries left as well, and the area fell into economic and structural decline."---

The southeast side lost population, but the families who remained retain a fierce sense of pride in their home turf. The past few years have seen an increase in proposals for locating new heavy polluting industries or waste-related operations on the southeast side....

“Once the petcoke comes there will just be even more garbage sent here,” said resident Richard McGraw, a retired accountant who would like to see solar farms and solar panel manufacturing on the brownfields of the southeast side. “Petcoke will speed the decline of the East Side – we’ll slide into oblivion.”

It is a story re-enacted over and over again: find a poor or declining neighborhood and dump toxic processing plants or storage facilities there.

But in Chicago, the residents are fighting back against a mayor who favors the likes of the Koch brothers over his own constituents. They are also, foremost, for the right to live in healthy neigborhoods for raising families and building communities that are not regarded as dumping grounds by industry and politicians alike.


Kit B (276)
Friday January 24, 2014, 6:55 am

Now, tell me again how toxins in our environment are not a hazard to health. Explain why the most expensive campaign against science is funded mostly by the Koch brothers and others who stand to make huge profits; are working so hard to convince the public that there is no climatic change.

Petroleum coke (often abbreviated Pet coke or petcoke) is a carbonaceous solid derived from oil refinery coker units or other cracking processes. Other coke has traditionally been derived from coal.

This coke can either be fuel grade (high in sulphur and metals) or anode grade (low in sulphur and metals). The raw coke directly out of the coker is often referred to as green coke. In this context, "green" means unprocessed. The further processing of green coke by calcining in a rotary kiln removes residual volatile hydrocarbons from the coke. The calcined petroleum coke can be further processed in an anode baking oven in order to produce anode coke of the desired shape and physical properties. The anodes are mainly used in the aluminium and steel industry.

Petcoke is over 90 percent carbon and emits 5 to 10 percent more carbon dioxide (CO2) than coal on a per-unit-of-energy basis when it is burned. As petcoke has a higher energy content, petcoke emits between 30 and 80 percent more CO2 than coal per unit of weight. The differences between coal and coke in CO2 production per unit energy produced are small and depend upon the moisture in the coal (increases the CO2 per unit energy -- Heat of combustion) and volatile hydrocarbon in coal and coke (decrease the CO2 per unit energy).
**This is a generalized explanation of PetCoke and not meant to be a full scientific analysis. (From Wiki)

Sue Matheson (79)
Friday January 24, 2014, 8:10 am

JL A (281)
Friday January 24, 2014, 12:06 pm
I had heard that Detroit had moved to get it out of their area and that much of Chicago's is what used to be headed to Detroit...seems all cities in the midwest should be prepared for this kind of blight if they don't act now to prevent and stop it.

Barbara K (60)
Friday January 24, 2014, 3:28 pm
Thank you, my friend. I hope Chicago residents keep on prohibiting this crap from being near their city. Put it in the Koch's yards.

Val M (82)
Friday January 24, 2014, 5:48 pm
Thanks for posting this. The Koch brothers are poisoning people. I hope they get exposed to their poisons themselves.. Residents of the Chicago vicinity need to keep on their toes to keep fighting this stuff.
BTW, the website that posted the article, , is good.
It helps to keep checking their articles.

Susan Clay (0)
Friday January 24, 2014, 6:50 pm
The emissions from storage piles are substantial and poorly understood by people who have not been impacted by the emissions from these piles or by anyone who has not done the emission calculations. Thanks for posting this article, It needs more attention.

Carol P (46)
Friday January 24, 2014, 7:11 pm
Looks to me like an instance where regulation and oversight could help. Of course, no one would want to pay the costs. It really is too bad that business doesn't care about doing the right thing.

Mary Donnelly (47)
Friday January 24, 2014, 7:54 pm
Thanks KIt.

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Friday January 24, 2014, 8:31 pm
Thank you for the important news! (p, t)

Mike Pattison (6)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 12:35 am
Thanks for the info.

Mike Pattison (6)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 12:35 am
Thanks for the info.

Bridget Robertson (106)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 1:12 am
Thank you Kit for the great information. And the explanation of pet coke.

Edo R (71)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 3:04 am
Thanks for sharing

SylvieBusy A (193)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 4:50 am
Notée. Merci.

. (0)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 8:17 am
Done. Considering I posted an article on this last year, it's taken all this time to come to light? Jeez!

Kit B (276)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 8:52 am

You and I both have posted on this abuse of human life in Chicago, Michael. I guess people just do not pay attention until they begin to see the illness cause by Pet-Coke.

Lucas Kolasa (9)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 9:22 am
These Koch brothers are total jerks.

Kit B (276)
Saturday January 25, 2014, 10:10 am

Yes, the Koch's are jerks, but that is not the problem. They are among the wealthiest people on the planet and have the resources to dictate policy for our government and many others.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Environment

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.