Start A Petition

Injustice Guaranteed

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: Cheney, Human Rights, Injustice, SCOTUS )

- 2358 days ago -
See 1st comment

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


TomCat S (129)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 12:13 am
A rather unusual case is making its way to the Supreme Court. Injustice will be done even if the four Justices are joined by one or more of the five Injustices in the better decision. The case involves a man who was falsely arrested in 2006 for having the audacity to criticize a war criminal, ChickenHawk Cheney. (I refuse to call him Dick, lest I be accosted by a gang of angry male body parts.)

Joe R (190)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 2:13 am
Yes, Cheney should be on trial. Noted.

P A (117)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 4:57 am
Completely agree TomCat - surely Mr Howard's Constitutional rights have been broken and scattered to the four winds - how can such a ludicrous case have ever come to trial?

lee e (114)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 4:58 am
The Exterminator - kept alive by all sorts of machinery will haunt us for the rest of our lives - I shall not grieve when his machinery gives out, if he's not trying to kill us with a fabricated war, he'll do it by fracking - at least he knows how US tax dollars should be spent - taking his law suits to the supreme super committee!

divergent revolution (309)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 6:53 am
cheney,of course
the poster boy for INJUSTICE

pam w (139)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 7:48 am
Interesting....GO GET 'EM, Mr. Howard! Cheney is much money did he make on this war his puppet started?

Ellen m (215)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 8:10 am
I wonder if Cheneys medical intervention of choice for now, and not opting for a permanent fix, (though at his age "permanent" is a relative term) has anything to do with wanting to see if this call for his head is going anywhere?
He may be sick, but i'd sure like to see him at least legally charged with something, even if its on his deathbed!

Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 10:26 am
Noted, thanks Tomcat.

Dotti L (85)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 10:30 am
Noted. Why is every picture shown of the Dick (I can say it, Tom) ugly? Oh, right, he is ugly inside and out.

Terrie Williams (798)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 10:43 am
The only picture of Darth Vader I want to see is the one of him in handcuffs in the courtroom at The Hague...

Kamila A (141)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 10:50 am
I think, of all the evil characters around today, Cheney is the one who leads them in every category: nasty, scary, conniving, demonic, ugly, creepy, etc.

David C (131)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 11:14 am
thanks, Tom, this seems to have escaped the radar of mainstream media and whats left of the liberal media....

Fiona Ogilvie (565)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 11:40 am
Thank you. Pure evil but we would never learn from the mainstream media.

Roger Skinner (14)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 11:42 am
While I agree that many politicians, especial the President and Vice-President, need protection (unfortunately) from physical assault or threats, and that those people protecting them need to be pro-active and sometimes aggressive in identifying and preventing such attacks, that does not seem to be the case here. As I often like to do, I read the original source from which this item comes that gives a more detailed account of what happened. See:

It seems that AFTER Howards had his 'confrontation' with Cheney, "Howards left the area to attend the piano recital, but he later passed near the vice president on his way out of the mall. At some point, Howards’s younger son wandered off. Secret Service agents approached Howards as he was looking for his son."

At that point there was a confrontation with the agents who then arrested him for assaulting Cheney. Seems rather strange that Howards wasn't immediately taken down and arrested at the time of the 'assault'. It seems rather obvious to me that Howards did NOT 'assault' the VP and that he did NOT pose any threat to the VP. It appears that the only reason he was arrested is because the agents didn't like what he was saying.

Carol H (229)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 1:24 pm
noted, thanks Tom

Eddie O (95)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 1:30 pm
Cheney has no conscious and would do anything immoral or even illegal to promote himself and his cause, no matter how unfair, how unjust, or how devestating it may be!

And, for anyone who is “sincerely” caring about this country, and wants to open their eyes to what’s really going on, please click on the link below and read this article. The author, with many, many, years of inside experience, feels BOTH THE DEMOCRATIC AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTIES ARE ROTTEN, and presents his case in a very: clear, factual, thorough, way.

Norm C (74)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 2:18 pm
Darth Cheney belongs behind bars, by his own admission to crimes against humanity.

Yvonne White (229)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 2:20 pm
Chney can shoot an old man in the face & then Make Him apologize, but civilians cannot disagree with the ex-VP Public?? WTF? "They later justified the arrest by claiming Mr. Howards lied to them about whether he “touched” the vice president during the brief encounter." IF a civilian Actually Touched the king of the undead, wouldn't the Sec. Service have tackled that person At That Time??? Was he pi$$ed because they Didn't & that's why they over-reacted????? Sounds pretty squirrelly to me.. I can see where (like NYPD) they were Only Following Orders, but that didn't work for the Nazis BEFORE & it shouldn't protect New Age Hired Thugs either.


ewoud k (68)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 2:39 pm
This man (I'm not talking about the former vice president, but about the man who critisized him) should never have been arrested in the first place.

In the second place, however, he'll never win his case. Injustice indeed guaranteed.

Goodbye First Amendment, it was good having you around. We'll miss you.

Dianna M (16)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 3:19 pm

Geeze, TomCat, WARN a person before posting a picture like that! I could've had a heart attack!

"IF a civilian Actually Touched the king of the undead" (Yvonne White's words)--wouldn't that turn HIM undead too? Zombieism is spread by a virus, you know!

And if "Darth Cheney" was actually touched by a member of the Unwashed Masses--couldn't the Cheney have force-choked him?

I have to make fun of this article. It's either that or start screaming hysterically (again).

Nelson Baker (0)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 4:05 pm
It is my opinion Cheney is so evil he could be a son of the devil. I believe many of our SCOTUS Justices are corrupt and they don't make decisions on the merits of the case they make decisions on what those who control them want them to do. I have lost all faith in SCOTUS.

LeMoyn Salmonsen (88)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 6:09 pm
I can't speak to Cheney any more. My Impeach Cheney hat and tee-shirt are frayed and faded their so old. I had a contractor come to the house a couple of years ago, when I was wearing my hat and he said "Well I guess there’s not doubt what side of the street you stand on." I told him the choice was easy and if he wanted to know why he could buy me beer and I’d be happy to tell him how and why. Guess who showed up at my gate around sundown with a 6 pack of Buds? It was Budweiser, but I gave him an hour plus of the reasons why, along with sources to check them out for himself, anyway.

Kamila A (141)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 6:25 pm
...I just wanted to add, I love you all here who posted, in solidarity with me, against EVIL!!! :o)

Mary T (178)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 7:40 pm
It is the evil devil Chaney please make him go away and fast I can't stand looking at him.

Christopher Fowler (82)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 8:20 pm
Hey Terrie Williams; Don't go insulting Darth Vader......Cheney is evil all the way to the core. Darth Vader was only deluded and eventually realized his mistake. Cheney, on the other hand will be evil all the way to the grave.

Cheney is evil and even though the SS was Supposedly protecting their charge, they were still lawfully accountable to insure that the rights of the individual are protected as well as the life, no matter how useless it is, of their charge.
Cheney should be charged and sued right alongside those agents; they were following his orders.

TomCat S (129)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 8:28 pm
Thanks to all and Kudos to several. Roger, I agree, except that I think that Cheney ordered it after the speech and before the arrest.

Lynn Squance (235)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 8:31 pm
Too bad Howard couldn't make a citizen's arrest of ChickenHawk Cheney and deliver him to the ICC to stand trial as a war criminal!

The Secret Service has a difficult job --- agents have to protect the president or vice president, taking a bullet if necessary, even though they may not 'like' the individual. And I agree that many such decisions are split second affording no time for debate. Is it the protectee that sets the form of protection or is it the protector that does. If Cheney said "arrest this idiot for asking that question" then for sure Cheney should be the one charged, not the agents. But even if Cheney did say that, nobody would ever get him to admit it. His teflon suit will protect him for now.

Even though Howard was arrested and charges dropped, he still has his 1st amendment rights which were curtailed by the agents. Those rights are sacrosanct and someone needs to account. Personally, I don't find his question rude, just very direct and completely understandable in the context.

I am afraid that justice will never be done when it involves Cheney.

Jelica R (144)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 8:39 pm
Dick Cheney’s Song of America

The Plan is for the United States to rule the world. The overt theme is unilateralism, but it is ultimately a story of domination. It calls for the United States to maintain its overwhelming military superiority and prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge it on the world stage. It calls for dominion over friends and enemies alike. It says not that the United States must be more powerful, or most powerful, but that it must be absolutely powerful.

By David Armstrong; Harper's Magazine, 0017789X, Oct 2002, Vol. 305, Issue 1829

Few writers are more ambitious than the writers of government policy papers, and few policy papers are more ambitious than Dick Cheney’s masterwork. It has taken several forms over the last decade and is in fact the product of several ghostwriters (notably Paul Wolfowitz and Colin Powell), but Cheney has been consistent in his dedication to the ideas in the documents that bear his name, and he has maintained a close association with the ideologues behind them. Let us, therefore, call Cheney the author, and this series of documents the Plan.


Past Member (0)
Tuesday December 6, 2011, 10:27 pm
Thanks for this article.

Susanne R (235)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 1:50 am
Tom, I hope you don't mind, but I'm going to cut and paste my response to this issue in a thread posted by Horsehockey Horace on Monday:

Monday December 5, 2011, 5:31 pm
"Let's see. Cheney shoots someone in the face and doesn't face any charges --and even gets is an apology from his victim for getting in his way! Someone questions Cheney about his part in the Iraq war and puts his palm on his shoulder, and he gets arrested. And now the Secret Service might have to take the rap for protecting the miserable bastard from having to explain his part in thousands of unnecessary deaths! This man is made of teflon!"

This issue can't be brought up often enough! Cheney is evil personified, and he can't keep getting away with "murder" --both literally and figuratively! His contributions to the start and duration of multiple questionable wars makes him a "murderer" in my book!

KS Goh (0)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 4:23 am
Thanks for the article.

Kristen H (25)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 7:59 am
Noted, thanks.

patricia lasek (317)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 8:24 am
The only "probable cause" they had for arresting him was doing Cheney's will.

Sue Matheson (79)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 9:38 am

TomCat S (129)
Wednesday December 7, 2011, 9:56 pm
Thanks all. Kudos to Lynn and Jelica. Of course not, Sue.

Robert B (60)
Thursday December 8, 2011, 4:24 pm
Justice with this Supreme court? Hmmmm, good luck.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.