START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

China Opens Longest High-Speed Rail Line


Science & Tech  (tags: china, world, technology, Sustainabililty, goodnews, eco-friendly, CoolStuff, coolstuff, business, travel, concept, design, energy, environment, NewTechnology, performance, society, technology )

JL
- 692 days ago - nytimes.com
China began service Wednesday morning on the world's longest high-speed rail line, covering a distance in eight hours that is about equal to that from New York to Key West, Fla., or from London across Europe to Belgrade, Serbia.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

JL A. (272)
Friday December 28, 2012, 8:33 am

The New York Times

December 26, 2012
China Opens Longest High-Speed Rail Line
By KEITH BRADSHER

HONG KONG — China began service Wednesday morning on the world’s longest high-speed rail line, covering a distance in eight hours that is about equal to that from New York to Key West, Fla., or from London across Europe to Belgrade, Serbia.

Trains traveling 300 kilometers, or 186 miles, an hour, began regular service between Beijing and Guangzhou, the main metropolis in southeastern China. Older trains still in service on a parallel rail line take 21 hours; Amtrak trains from New York to Miami, a shorter distance, still take nearly 30 hours.

Completion of the Beijing-Guangzhou route — roughly 1,200 miles — is the latest sign that China has resumed rapid construction on one of the world’s largest and most ambitious infrastructure projects, a network of four north-south routes and four east-west routes that span the country.

Lavish spending on the project has helped jump-start the Chinese economy twice: in 2009, during the global financial crisis, and again this autumn, after a brief but sharp economic slowdown over the summer.

The hiring of as many as 100,000 workers for each line has kept a lid on unemployment as private-sector construction has slowed because of limits on real estate speculation. The national network has helped to reduce air pollution in Chinese cities and helped to curb demand for imported diesel fuel by freeing capacity on older rail lines for goods to be carried by freight trains instead of heavily polluting, costlier trucks.

But the high-speed rail system has also been controversial in China. Debt to finance the construction has reached nearly 4 trillion renminbi, or $640 billion, making it one of the most visible reasons total debt has been surging as a share of economic output in China, and is approaching levels in the West.

Each passenger car taken off the older, slower rail lines makes room for three freight cars because passenger trains have to move so quickly that they force freight trains to stop frequently. But although the high-speed trains have played a big role in allowing sharp increases in freight shipments, the Ministry of Railways has not yet figured out a way to charge large freight shippers, many of them politically influential state-owned enterprises, for part of the cost of the high-speed lines, which haul only passengers.

The high-speed trains are also considerably more expensive than the heavily subsidized older passenger trains. A second-class seat on the new bullet trains from Beijing to Guangzhou costs 865 renminbi ($139) one way, compared with 426 renminbi ($68) for the cheapest bunk on one of the older trains, which also have narrow, uncomfortable seats for as little as 251 renminbi ($40).

Worries about the high-speed network peaked in July 2011, when one high-speed train plowed into the back of another near Wenzhou in southeastern China, killing 40 people.

A subsequent investigation blamed flawed signaling equipment for the crash. China had been operating high-speed trains at 350 kilometers an hour (about 218 m.ph.), and it cut the top speed to the current rate in response to that crash.

The crash crystallized worries about the haste with which China has built its high-speed rail system. The first line, from Beijing to Tianjin, opened a week before the 2008 Olympics; a little more than four years later, the country now has 9,349 kilometers, or 5,809 miles, of high-speed lines.

China’s aviation system has a good international reputation for safety, and its occasional deadly crashes have not attracted nearly as much attention. Transportation safety experts attribute the public’s fascination with the Wenzhou crash partly to the novelty of the system and partly to a distrust among many Chinese of what is perceived as a homegrown technology, in contrast with the Boeing and Airbus jets flown by Chinese airlines.

Japanese rail executives have complained, however, that the Chinese technology is mostly copied from them, an accusation that Chinese rail executives have strenuously denied.

The main alternative to trains for most Chinese lies in the country’s roads, which have a grim reputation by international standards. Periodic crashes of intercity buses kill dozens of people at a time, while crashes of private cars are frequent in a country where four-fifths of new cars are sold to first-time buyers, often with scant driving experience.

Flights between Beijing and Guangzhou take about three hours and 15 minutes. But air travelers in China need to arrive at least an hour before a flight, compared with 20 minutes for high-speed trains, and the airports tend to be farther from the centers of cities than the high-speed train stations.

Land acquisition is the toughest part of building high-speed rail lines in the West, because the tracks need to be almost perfectly straight, and it has been an issue in China as well. Although local and provincial governments have forced owners to sell land for the tracks themselves, there have been disputes over suddenly valuable land near rail stations, with the result that surprisingly few stores and other commercial venues have sprung up around some high-speed stations used by tens of thousands of travelers every day.

Zhao Xiangfeng, a farmer in Henan Province, said a plan to build a mini-mall on his and six other farmers’ land near a station had been shelved indefinitely after he and three of the other farmers refused to lease the land for any price close to what the village leadership offered. He said he worried that local leaders might try stronger tactics on the farmers to force them to lease the land and revive the project.

The 664-mile southern segment of the new high-speed rail line, from Guangzhou as far as Wuhan, has been open for nearly three years. The trains, which come every four to 12 minutes, are often packed, which could limit the number of seats available for travel to Beijing.

Mia Li in Beijing contributed research.
 

Michael Kirkby (86)
Friday December 28, 2012, 12:10 pm
Too bad they couldn't put as much effort into cleaning up their environment; and honoring the commitment it would take to fulfill a Kyoto style agreement. Still, it shows what China is capable of. Get your priorities in the proper perspective please - damming rivers and levelling mountain ranges is not eco friendly.
 

Roger Garin-michaud (105)
Friday December 28, 2012, 12:30 pm
noted, thanks !
 

Kit B. (276)
Friday December 28, 2012, 1:21 pm

Meanwhile ,in the United States we focus on ever more highways and repaving old broken streets. Some, the few are using bicycles, some cities have plans to expand forms of rapid transit, mostly we seem content to leave things as they were in the LAST centuries. Though China like the rest of the of the world has some serious issues to address, not the least of which is what to do with trash, but they are doing rapid transit rather well.
 

JL A. (272)
Friday December 28, 2012, 3:47 pm
True Michael, but they are minimizing the need for more cars. You cannot currently send a star to Michael because you have done so within the last week.
You are welcome Roger!
At least Obama has some funding out there for high speed rail (Midwest seems furthest along with the funded plans) Kit-sad a couple of GOP governors refused to let their states proceed. You cannot currently send a star to Kit because you have done so within the last week.
 

Tanya W. (53)
Saturday December 29, 2012, 3:30 am
Noted, thanks Kit.
 

John B. (158)
Saturday December 29, 2012, 4:42 am
Thanks J.L. for the post. Now if China could only focus on the other environmental problems. Read and noted.
 

Hayley C. (7)
Saturday December 29, 2012, 8:44 am
Interesting....thanks
 

Christeen Anderson (535)
Saturday December 29, 2012, 2:01 pm
Thank you for sharing this with us. It looks awesome to me.
 

Kara C. (15)
Saturday December 29, 2012, 9:19 pm
Can I please have one of these in Australia! In Queensland aren't even allowed to go over 80kms and hour!
 

JL A. (272)
Sunday December 30, 2012, 9:10 am
You are welcome Tanya, John, Hayley and Christeen
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.