Start A Petition

ALEC-Inspired "Right to Work" Bill Back Again in Pennsylvania

Business  (tags: corporate, business, americans, abuse, dishonesty, economy, ethics, finance, government, investments, investing, labor, investors, lies, marketing, money, politics, society, usa, law )

- 1968 days ago -
Will the Keystone State follow Michigan and attempt to bust the state's unions with help from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and its allies?

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


JL A (281)
Saturday February 2, 2013, 9:31 am

PR Watch
Published on PR Watch (

Home > ALEC-Inspired "Right to Work" Bill Back Again in Pennsylvania
ALEC-Inspired "Right to Work" Bill Back Again in Pennsylvania
by Brendan Fischer [1] January 31, 2013 - 8:17am
Topics: Labor [2]
Projects: ALEC Exposed [3]
Share/Save Share this [4]

Will the Keystone State follow Michigan and attempt to bust the state's unions with help from the American Legislative Exchange Council [5] (ALEC) and its allies?
ALEC Foot Soldier Darryl Metcalfe Proposes So-Called "Right to Work"

Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Darryl Metcalfe has introduced so-called "right to work" legislation that would cripple state labor unions by allowing non-union members to free-ride -- benefiting from union representation, including higher wages and benefits, without paying the costs of that representation. For decades, right to work laws were used in southern states to bust unions and keep wages low.

Metcalfe's bill, like the recent Michigan's legislation [6], is strikingly similar to the ALEC "model" Right to Work Act. (See the side-by-side here [7].)

This comes as no surprise as Metcalfe has been a loyal ALEC foot soldier for many years.

In 2011, he was a chief sponsor of Pennsylvania's voter ID legislation [8], which very closely tracked the ALEC "model" Voter ID Act. [9] (See the side-by-side here [10].) Metcalfe was also a key supporter [11] in Pennsylvania of ALEC/NRA-inspired "Stand Your Ground" legislation, which was modeled after the Florida law initially cited to protect George Zimmerman after he shot and killed unarmed Trayvon Martin.

In 2009, Metcalfe introduced the anti-immigrant "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act," which was nearly identical to the infamous Arizona law SB 1070 (largely struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court). Metcalfe actually introduced the bill one month before Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce introduced the legislation in his state, but after members of the ALEC Public Safety and Elections Task Force adopted [12]the legislation as a "model" for states across the country. That task force included representatives of the private prison and private bail industries, both of which stood to profit [13] from increased immigrant detention. That ALEC task force was disbanded last year when its role in promulgating this type of controversial legislation was exposed and firms like Coca-Cola began fleeing the organization.

In addition, Metcalfe founded the anti-immigrant "Legislators for Legal Immigration," part of the nativist John Tanton Network (which has been described [14] as a hate group), and organized a rally to coincide with the 2007 ALEC meeting in Pennsylvania [15].

In anticipation of that 2007 ALEC conference, Metcalfe and other Pennsylvania legislators made a $50,000 budget appropriation [16] to provide food for the corporate lobbyists and state legislators attending the ALEC meeting. Pennsylvania taxpayers paid $30,450 for roasted chicken breast and $3,000 for cheesecake lollipops, among other expenses.
Proposal Backed by Tea Party Groups AFP and FreedomWorks

Rep. Metcalfe has introduced this union-busting legislation in every session [17] over the past fourteen years. But this time might be different. Republicans control both houses of the Pennsylvania legislature and the governor's seat, as they do in Michigan. Plus, union busting is becoming a top priority of some Tea Party groups with very deep pockets.

"If Michigan, the home to the United Autoworkers Union, can pass Right to Work, it can pass ... here," declared [18] the Pennsylvania chapter of the David Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity [19] (AFP) network. AFP was a key pusher of the union-busting bill in Michigan, conducting a press offensive and engaging in astroturf activities as the bill was rammed through the legislature.

The Tea Party group FreedomWorks [20] has also prioritized anti-union advocacy in 2013, and has published a study [21] purporting to show the effectiveness of similar "paycheck protection" legislation in defunding unions in Pennsylvania.

Stephen Moore of the Wall Street Journal editorial board provided some high-profile support for the effort when he penned an article on January 25 [22] supporting right to work in Pennsylvania. Moore has long been involved with ALEC. He is listed as an ALEC "scholar" on the organizations website and often speaks at ALEC meetings. He also is the co-author of ALEC's annual "Rich States Poor States [23]" report -- and in his WSJ op-ed, Moore appears to cite his own study to claim the bill is good for state economies (writing "A study by the American Legislative Exchange Council finds that new factories and facilities are much more likely to open in states without forced unionism.")

Moore does not disclose that he authored the report, whose claims have been discredited by economists at Good Jobs First and at academic institutions. [24]The Economic Policy Institute has also specifically rebutted [25] the Rich States Poor States claims about the benefits of right to work, finding that the laws actually correspond [26] with lower wages, fewer benefits and decreased workplace safety. Also worthy of note is the fact that Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp, which owns the Wall Street Journal, is also an ALEC funder. [27]
Bill Is Part of ALEC-Inspired "Open Workforce Initiative" Package

Metcalfe's proposal is part of a package called the "Open Workforce Initiative," where six different legislators have proposed six different iterations of ALEC-inspired anti-union legislation. Four of the six legislators are known ALEC members.

HB 51, 52, and 53 each echo the ALEC "Public Employee Freedom Act [28]," which prohibits unions from collecting dues from non-union members to pay for the costs of representation (HB 51 would apply to public school employees, HB 52 to state workers, and HB 53 to local government workers). HB 54, sponsored by ALEC member Rep. Jerry Knowles, is nearly identical to Metcalfe's right to work bill, but would only apply to the private sector. HB 250 is Pennsylvania-specific legislation that would amend the labor relations code to allow teachers to drop their union membership at any time.

Union membership is at its lowest level [29] since the 1930s, but anti-union legislation has found renewed energy since Republicans achieved new majorities in statehouses across the country after the 2010 elections. These efforts are motivated by more than just "workplace freedom." The U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Citizens United opened the floodgates to unlimited fundraising and spending from Super PACs and dark money groups, which have overwhelmingly supported Republicans. Unions have provided one of the few counterweights to the corporate and special interest money on the right. By weakening and defunding unions, the relative influence of right-wing donors over elections and politicians is greatly increased.

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett said in December [30] 2012 he doesn't expect to see right to work pass in Pennsylvania. But Michigan Governor Rick Snyder was similarly lukewarm until December, when pushed by groups like AFP he put his support behind the legislation and signed it into law after passing in a lame duck session.

Attachment Size
Penn_voterID.pdf [10] 119.75 KB
Penn_HB_50_sidebyside.pdf [7] 106.56 KB
Center for Media and Democracy 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Phone: 608-260-9713 Fax: 608-260-9714
Source URL:


jan b (5)
Saturday February 2, 2013, 9:45 am
Thousands of state legislators pay a nominal fee to attend American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) retreats to receive model legislation--- puts corporate interests over American workers and consumers.

Mitchell D (87)
Saturday February 2, 2013, 1:34 pm
Are we the laughing stock of the world, yet?
This is all about feeding the Plutocracy, while the ideals of democracy languish!

Roger G (154)
Saturday February 2, 2013, 3:20 pm
noted, thanks !

Giana Peranio-paz (398)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 12:21 am
Noted thanks.

Sergey K. (0)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 2:18 am
You are very good author of legal articles, I wish you to write something to the section of prison legal news on Attorney Online You and your friends who provide legal services also can submit contacts to Attorney directory and post to Attorney Blog. By the way I also can write something to your legal blog. Contact me please.

Autumn S (151)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 4:27 am
noted, thank you

paul m (93)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 5:47 am

Right to work for a right wage...!!

JL A (281)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 8:54 am
You are welcome Roger, Tim, Giana and Autumn.
You cannot currently send a star to janice because you have done so within the last week.
You cannot currently send a star to Mitchell because you have done so within the last week.

. (0)
Sunday February 3, 2013, 10:06 am
Between corporate/political mismanagement and union malfeasance we now have in NA the right to work, hard at work to private industries and services starting with Canada Post for example. Of course things change and how they have in the last ten years. How they have since the G20.
The middle class is shrinking a little more each year along with our individual rights and freedoms. The Plutocracy is indeed hard at work recreating the Divine Right Of Kings who will then lord it over their indentured wage/credit slaves at their pleasure or displeasure. We already have a PM who does I think pose as an emperor in private - a legend in his own mind. Unfortunately when he issues many of his caveats the people object. Damn nuisance for him and his court I presume.

Postulated scenario....
Say cousin Heinz, I have a surfeit of poor serfs and dwindling resources. Could I impose upon you to participate in a conflict to reduce the population until the resource levels are back up? Supply and demand and all that? Oh, I see, you're busy enacting national eugenics and sterilization programs. Jolly good idea cousin. I wonder if we could influence the King and his court to impose such measure here? Meantime, how about a few skirmishes on a foreign third class playing field? I'm sure they won't miss a few foreign indigenous folks along with the serfs sacrificed during the manufactured insurrection? Don't forget to provide armaments to both sides. That way we can reduce indigenous populations and make a huge profit from armament sales to both factions. Win, win situation for us. See you at the next heads of state summit.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Business

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.