Start A Petition

TeliaSonera's Uzbekistan Scandal Is a Warning to Telecom CEOs Everywhere

Business  (tags: 'HUMANRIGHTS!', humanrights, HumanRights, corruption, conflict, world, politics, media, business, abuse, corporate, corruption, dishonesty, ethics, finance, investments, investors, law, lies, marketing, money, society, usa )

- 1924 days ago -
It's the first time a big telecom CEO has quit over a scandal in emerging markets. For a decade, telcos have relied on foreign subsidiaries and far-flung partner groups with questionable records on corruption and human rights. They're now starting to pay

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


JL A (281)
Monday February 11, 2013, 12:41 pm

TeliaSonera’s Uzbekistan scandal is a warning to telecom CEOs everywhere
By Peter Micek — February 3, 2013
Peter Micek is a lawyer and policy counsel at Access ( in New York, an NGO that advocates for the human rights of telecoms and internet users worldwide.
What does Egypt's internet crackdown of two years ago have to do with the departure of TeliaSonera's CEO? Telecoms in emerging markets face a grave test. AP Photo / Manoocher Deghati

The chickens are coming home to roost. Lars Nyberg resigned yesterday as CEO of TeliaSonera, the Sweden-based global telecommunications company, in the wake of an investigation into a 3G licensing deal in Uzbekistan.

It’s the first time a big telecom CEO has quit over a scandal in emerging markets. For a decade, telcos have relied on foreign subsidiaries and far-flung partner groups with questionable records on corruption and human rights. They’re now starting to pay the price.

Though TeliaSonera was cleared of bribery and money-laundering charges, an independent audit faulted the company for failing to do due diligence when paying 2.3 billion kronor ($350 million) for the license in 2007 from a shell firm, Takilant, which allegedly has ties to to Gulnara Karimova, daughter of dictatorial Uzbek President Islam Karimov. Last fall, Nyberg gave his word that if the corruption charges proved true, he would resign. To his credit, he stepped down, even when cleared of explicit wrongdoing.

But it’s about more than just one company.

Nyberg’s resignation comes exactly two years since telecoms shocked the world by disconnecting Egypt from the internet during the uprising against Hosni Mubarak, at Mubarak’s request. (My organization, Access, has a Telco Hall of Shame that documents this and other inglorious moments in recent telecoms history.) It is clear that a pattern has emerged: In chasing profits in emerging markets, telecoms are facing difficult choices and overlooking laws, whether domestic, international, or simply moral.

Telecoms claim they have little power to resist or alter strict operating licenses when they sign with foreign governments. To some extent they’re right. TeliaSonera experienced this firsthand in Belarus when President Alexander Lukashenko demanded that operators install SORM, a surveillance system allowing state security to access company networks. TeliaSonera complied, one in a pattern of decisions that opened the company to criticism that it helped state security locate political dissidents. In Egypt, Vodafone likewise blamed its licensing agreement, saying its contract required the provider to comply with the request to shut down the network.

But while the pressure for telecommunications companies to comply with a government’s demands in order to get licenses can be intense, the pressure in the other direction is growing too. As markets get riskier, companies that do nothing in the face of corruption charges and human-rights violations face greater consequences. And it’s not just a matter of managing risk. In 2011 the UN Human Rights Council adopted the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, which made corporate respect for human rights a matter of international law.
The telcos’ hands are not tied

So what can these companies do? If they band together, and demand respect for human rights and proper due diligence in their operating agreements, they can turn the licenses they are seeking into an opportunity not just to get new business but also to stand up for their customers, uphold international rule of law against corruption—and even preserve their own boardrooms.

Eleven of the world’s largest telcos, from Vodafone to AT&T, have come together to address these issues under the banner of the Industry Dialogue on Freedom of Expression and Privacy. Access’s Telco Action Plan contains principles and practical advice for them on how to work in ways that respect human rights. As an international NGO, we don’t just agitate on behalf of victims of human-rights abuse, but work with investors, users, shareholders and lawmakers, all of whom are eager to see the telcos innovate as much in policy and the rights of their users as they do in their technology and business development.

TeliaSonera was a key player in the Industry Dialogue. It is unclear what Nyberg’s resignation will mean, both for the company and for the initiative. The Industry Dialogue urgently needs new leaders to step up. Despite their self imposed 2102 deadline, we have not seen a final statement of principles from them or an announcement of where the Industry Dialogue will house itself for the long term.

And it’s Nyberg’s very departure that should convince telecom CEOs that they need to be those new leaders. Global telecommunications have transformed the way people interact, participate in society, connect with the world, and, in the words of none other than Nyberg himself, “It is an undeniable fact that modern telecommunications speed up a country’s long journey towards democracy.” Telecom CEOs everywhere should take note, and push for better compliance on corruption and respect for human rights, before they, too, become the fall guys for their industry’s failings.

. (0)
Tuesday February 12, 2013, 9:53 am
Then there's countries like Mexico which charge a 30% fee to open up a new business. Everyone has got their hand out. Kudos for this guy for stepping down and doing the right thing.

Birgit W (160)
Tuesday February 12, 2013, 3:48 pm
Thank you

JL A (281)
Tuesday February 12, 2013, 5:34 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Michael because you have done so within the last week.
You are welcome Birgit

Ramu Reddy (8)
Wednesday February 13, 2013, 12:10 am

Tom Edgar (56)
Wednesday February 13, 2013, 12:30 am
When anybody claims that in some countries the only way to do business is via the bribery and corruption route then they are admitting they are just as corrupted. Some years ago I had a very lucrative and regular loose contract with a major nation wide company, via their "Buyer".. After several assignments I was quite openly asked for a personal contribution, which I declined. My services were no longer required. A fellow Commercial Photographer, heard about it, and in conversation it transpired he had been my predecessor, losing the contract for the same reason.
At least we had both retained our integrity, which is more than can be said for the "Buyer". Some years later I found he had been caught. He lost his job, his pension, and any chance of a similar job elsewhere. He couldn't lose his integrity he didn't have one.

JL A (281)
Wednesday February 13, 2013, 8:31 am
Thanks for the examples of how such bribery and corruption can happen Tom. You cannot currently send a star to Tom because you have done so within the last week.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Business

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.