Start A Petition

America^s Hidden Jihad

Society & Culture  (tags: Muslim terrorists, usa, violence, crime, culture, death, ethics, murder, religion, safety, society )

- 933 days ago -
But what about the case of Yusuf Ibrahim? In early 2013, when he was 27, this Egyptian~born Muslim lived in Jersey City, when he allegedly shot, then cut off the heads and hands and knocked the teeth out of two Coptic Christians then buried them

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Gillian M (11)
Sunday December 27, 2015, 2:21 pm
The police and press did an impressive job of sleuthing into the lives and motives of Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, the married couple who massacred 14 people on Dec. 2, in San Bernardino, Calif.

We know about their families, their studies and employment histories, their travels, their marriage, their statements, and their preparations for the assault. Most importantly, the cascade of background work reveals that the pair had jihadi intentions, meaning they attacked in their role as pious Muslims spreading the message, law and sovereignty of Islam.

We are all better off for knowing these facts, which have had a powerful impact on the body politic, making Americans far more concerned with jihadi violence than at any time since just after Sept. 11, 2001, as they should be. For example, in 2011, 53 percent told a pollster that terrorism was a critical issue; that number has now reached 75 percent.

But what about the case of Yusuf Ibrahim? In early 2013, when he was 27, this Egyptian-born Muslim lived in Jersey City, when he allegedly shot, then cut off the heads and hands and knocked the teeth out of two Coptic Christians, Hanny F. Tawadros and Amgad A. Konds, then buried them in Buena Vista Township, N.J.

He is charged with two counts each of murder, felony murder, kidnapping, robbery, desecration of human remains, and other crimes. In addition, he has pleaded guilty to a Dec. 22, 2011, carjacking and a Sept. 20, 2012, armed robbery, both in Jersey City (in the latter, he shot his victim in the foot). Early in 2015, he was sentenced to 18 years in prison for these later crimes.

The twin beheadings were spectacular, gruesome and replete with jihadi (or in police parlance, “terrorist”) elements. Historian Timothy Furnish explains that “ritual beheading has a long precedent in Islamic theology and history,” making it a distinctly Muslim form of execution. A Muslim killing a non-Muslim fits the ageless pattern of Islamic supremacism. It also fits a tragic pattern of behavior in the United States in recent years.

Yet the police, politicians, the press and professors (i.e., the Establishment) have shown not the slightest interest in the Islamic angle, treating the double beheadings and amputations as a routine local murder. Symptomatic of this, the police report about Ibrahim’s arrest makes no mention of motivation; on the basis of this lack of mention, left-leaning (which describes itself as the “definitive Internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation”) goes so far as to dismiss as “false” the allegation that the mainstream media “deliberately ignored” this incident. The wagons have been circled.

Almost three years after the event, we know next-to-nothing about Ibrahim, his motives, his possible connections to others, or his institutional affiliations. We also do not know the relationship of the accused attacker to his victims: Was he a criminal who fell out with his accomplices, a friend who had drunk too much, a would-be lover knocking off his rivals for the affections of a woman, a family member eliminating aspirants for an inheritance, a crazy man randomly shooting passers-by? Or was he perhaps a jihadi seeking to spread the message, law, and sovereignty of Islam?

I cannot answer those questions because the case lingers in total obscurity, popping up from time to time only in connection with some technical procedural matter (such as the amount of Ibrahim’s bail or the admissibility of his confession) that sheds no light on the motives for his alleged crime.

Nor is the Ibrahim case unusual. There are long lists of other potential instances of jihadi violence in which the Establishment has colluded to sweep the Islamic dimension under the rug, treating the perpetrators as common criminals whose biographies, motives and connections are of no interest and, therefore, remain unknown.

This silence about possible jihad has the major consequence of lulling the American public (and its counterparts elsewhere in the West) into believing jihadi violence is far rarer than is the case. If the body politic understood the full extent of jihad in America, the alarm would be much greater; the percentage of those calling terrorism a critical issue would rise much higher than the current 75 percent. That, in turn, might push the Establishment finally to get serious about confronting jihad.


Steve D (13)
Sunday December 27, 2015, 2:34 pm
It sounds like the trial for the crime has not happened yet, which means that all the details surrounding the case should indeed be kept away from the public. For better or worse everyone in America is entitled to a fair trial and how can you expect to select an impartial jury if the details of everything are splashed all over the news?
Like any other legal case until this trial is over we do not need to know everything, only the jury needs that information before you do.

Gillian M (11)
Tuesday December 29, 2015, 6:17 am
Steve, there is a difference between being legally not guilty and everyone knowing that you are guilty even though you have not been processed by a court. After all, Hitler wasn't found guilty of the Holocaust, Goring was tried at Nuremburg as the most senior member of the government and found guilty on everyone's behalf. If you want to be pedantic, Hitler was tried in absentia as the leader of the government but they were all found guilty.

The Islamic State members are guilty of mass murder of Christians, minorities, Westerners and other Muslims but there has not been a trial, we have seen and heard the evidence. Boko Harem kidnaps little girls and rapes them, do you doubt that? So why doubt other terrorists have committed terrorism just because they are in the US?


Steve D (13)
Tuesday December 29, 2015, 1:59 pm
Penny I do not understand your argument. The actions of the third Reich are not what is being disputed in the story, neither is the islamic state or boko haram. the article is about someone currently in the US justice system, as were my comments.
As for your point about "everyone knowing that you are guilty" remember that the very people you mention in your reply to me "knew" the people they killed were "guilty" of the crimes they charged them with. The only reason anyone in the third Reich was charged at all is because they lost the war. It only depends upon what side you are on.

Kamia T (89)
Tuesday December 29, 2015, 9:18 pm
More and more of these sorts of events are going to continue to occur. They have been predicted in many sacred texts for millenia, as repugnant as they may be.

Past Member (0)
Sunday January 17, 2016, 12:18 pm
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.