START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

IQ Myth Debunked By Canadian Researchers


Science & Tech  (tags: science, scientists, IQhumans, research, intelligence, study )

Michael
- 616 days ago - cbc.ca
An individual's IQ score -- long-held as the standard measure of human intelligence -- is not a valid way of assessing brainpower, say Canadian researchers.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Michael O. (172)
Wednesday December 19, 2012, 8:38 pm
A team from Western University is debunking the concept of general intelligence, saying that there is no single component that can account for how a person performs various mental and cognitive tasks.

Instead, human intelligence is made up of multiple and distinct components, each of which must be looked at independently.

The study, published today in the journal Neuron, included the largest online intelligence survey on record, which recruited more than 100,000 participants.

"The uptake was astonishing," said Adrian M. Owen, the project's senior investigator. "We expected a few hundred responses, but thousands and thousands of people took part, including people of all ages, culture and creeds from every corner of the world."

The survey, which was open to anyone in the world with an internet connection, asked respondents to complete 12 cognitive tests that tapped into memory, reasoning, attention and planning abilities.

The results showed that how people performed at the tests could only be explained with at least three distinct components: short-term memory, reasoning and verbal ability.

No single measure, such as an intelligence quotient, or IQ score, could account for how well, or how poorly, people did.

The researchers also used a brain-scanning technique known as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to look at the brains of a select group of participants as they performed different tasks.

They found that each cognitive component related to distinct circuits in the brain, supporting the idea of multiple specialized brain systems, each one with its own capacity.

The study also looked at respondents' backgrounds and lifestyle habits and found links between brain function and factors such as age and gender.

"Regular brain training didn't help people's cognitive performance at all, yet aging had a profound negative effect on both memory and reasoning abilities," said Owen.

Other factors were smoking, anxiety and the tendency to play videogames.

"Intriguingly, people who regularly played computer games did perform significantly better in terms of both reasoning and short-term memory," said Adam Hampshire, one of the study's authors.

"And smokers performed poorly on the short-term memory and the verbal factors, while people who frequently suffer from anxiety perform badly on the short-term memory factor in particular," Hampshire added.

The concept of a general intelligence factor dates back to at least 1904, when psychologist Charles Spearman suggested that there was a correlation between seemingly unrelated tasks, such as memorization, reading and performing arithmetic.

He called this link the 'g' factor, or general factor, and proposed that is accounted for an individual's performance across different mental tasks. Various intelligence tests, using a wide variety of methods, were developed throughout the 20th century as a way to evaluate children, students, military recruits and even potential hires.

Intelligence testing has often been criticized for various reasons, such as being culturally biased or for having invalid methodologies.

Yet it has been generally accepted that general intelligence does exist, even if it is difficult to measure.

"We have shown categorically that you cannot sum up the difference between people in terms of one number, and that is really what is important here," said Owen, adding that further tests still need to be done.

"Now we need to go forward and work out how we can assess the differences between people, and that will be something for future studies."

 

John B. (215)
Wednesday December 19, 2012, 9:44 pm
Thanks Michael for the link to the extremely interesting and informative CBC article. Read and noted.
 

mag.w.d. Aichberger (34)
Thursday December 20, 2012, 1:33 pm
IQ-tests highly efficiently and precisely test for eaxctly one thing: performance in IQ-test. And that score may tell about an individual about as much as GDP about the "health" of a nation.
 

Nimue P. (232)
Friday December 21, 2012, 1:57 am
Glad to hear it, I never did think those tests were good for much. Noted, thanks.
 

Danuta Watola (1196)
Friday December 21, 2012, 2:24 am
noted
 

Myke Salmon (325)
Friday December 21, 2012, 2:42 am
Oh No .... and I scored quite high... :-(
*LOL*
 

caroline s. (79)
Friday December 21, 2012, 2:53 am
Very interesting article, thanks!.
 

Gloria picchetti (286)
Friday December 21, 2012, 4:28 am
All the smarts in the world don't work well without common sense. Then what about the luck factor?
 

Tanya W. (46)
Friday December 21, 2012, 4:53 am
Thanks for sharing.
 

Suzanne L. (152)
Friday December 21, 2012, 7:06 am
Thank you for posting Michael. The IQ concept has been under fire for a long time. In the last few years Daniel Goleman has written books about social and emotional intelligence. People with a good ability to manage their emotions and a good ability to form healthy, meaningful relationships are happier than those who may be off the charts intellectually but are poor at these other forms of intelligence.
 

Debra B. (24)
Friday December 21, 2012, 9:19 am
Thanks
 

Jim Phillips (3209)
Friday December 21, 2012, 11:47 am
"Yet it has been generally accepted that general intelligence does exist, even if it is difficult to measure."

Glad that there are people doing research on intelligence. This study shows a progression towards a
better understanding of how intelligence is derived and used and where it comes from.

These researchers should be commended.

Ty, Michael.
.
 

Christeen Anderson (469)
Friday December 21, 2012, 12:35 pm
Quite interesting. Thank you.
 

Dave C. (214)
Friday December 21, 2012, 3:08 pm
interesting.....
 

Daphne Waisel (0)
Friday December 21, 2012, 8:37 pm
noted
 

june t. (65)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 12:31 am
interesting
 

Kerrie G. (135)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 1:23 am
Noted, thanks.
 

Robert O. (12)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 1:48 am
Thanks Michael.
 

Azmi Timur (0)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 3:30 am
Noted. Thank you.
 

Sue Matheson (70)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 6:32 am
interesting thanks
 

John Gregoire (255)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 6:33 am
Thanks!
 

Jaime A. (32)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 6:40 am
Noted.
 

Bruno Moreira (61)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 7:29 am
noted thanks
 

Amitav Dash (78)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 7:39 am
The researchers probably had low IQ scores ;>
 

Freya H. (304)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 2:01 pm
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
 

monka blanke (74)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 3:16 pm
Very interesting, thanks.
 

Tom Edgar (56)
Saturday December 22, 2012, 9:30 pm
I told you I wasn't THAT dumb.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.