START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Hawking's Black Hole 'Blunder' Shows How Little We Know About Gravity

Science & Tech  (tags: discovery, gravity, Stephen Hawking, research, space, astronomy, black holes, science, scientists )

- 1085 days ago -
Gravity isn't just a pain when you're climbing up a long flight of stairs or careening out of control down a hill on skis - it's also a nuisance for scientists such as Stephen Hawking, who are trying to understand how this force works in the universe.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Michael O (175)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 8:49 pm
By Bob McDonald, Quirks & Quarks

Gravity is the most far-reaching force known to man. It's what holds you in your chair and reaches across billions of light years of space to hold clusters of galaxies together. It's everywhere. So, you would think that something so common and familiar would have been figured out by now. In fact, its workings are still a mystery, and that mystery is a wrench in the scientific gears - or rather, an obstacle for physicists trying to come up with a single theory to describe the universe.

What we do know is that as soon as any kind of mass comes together in one place, gravity appears and pulls the whole system towards the centre. The more mass you have, the more gravity will appear. That's why astronauts walking on the moon felt lighter. The moon is smaller and less massive than the Earth. That's why stars and planets are round. A sphere is the smallest shape possible when gravity pulls towards the middle.

But while we can see and measure the effects of gravity, scientists are still perplexed over what causes it.

Einstein described how gravity works on a very large scale, and came up with the revolutionary idea that gravity is more than just a force; it is a bending of space and time. In other words, space is flexible, like the surface of a trampoline. A massive object, such as a star, is like a bowling ball making a depression in the centre of a trampoline. Something smaller, such as a ping-pong ball, will roll around the larger object, riding the walls of the gravity well, the way the Earth goes around the sun. That's how Einstein saw gravity's effect on space.

That model works very well on the large cosmic scale, but it doesn't seem to work at the quantum level, the micro-universe within the atom.

Quantum physicists do not see any effect of gravity down at the scale of quarks, leptons and other exotic particles inside a nucleus. And that is a problem, because they and the cosmologists would like to find a common theory that works in both realms, a unified theory of the entire universe.

At the moment, they are stymied by the fact that gravity just won't fit in.

However, in nature, there are two places where the large and small do come together. One was at the very beginning of the Big Bang, when the entire universe was squeezed into an unimaginably dense, hot, tiny space. The other is in a black hole. We can't go back to the beginning of time to look at the Big Bang, but black holes are around today, which makes them natural laboratories to sort this problem out.

The classic picture of a black hole is an area in space where so much mass has accumulated that it fell in on itself and gravity shot up to infinity. If you approach a black hole, it will begin to pull you in. If you change your mind and try to back up, you will have to move really fast to escape that powerful gravity, which gets stronger as you get closer. At one point, called the event horizon, that escape velocity is the speed of light. Since Einstein said nothing can travel faster than light, you are doomed to fall into the hole and disappear forever from this universe.

But the quantum scientists say your identity, the information about you, cannot simply vanish. In their quantum world, information has to be conserved somehow. So, Houston, we have a problem. The two theories are in conflict.

That's why Stephen Hawking delivered a short paper this week to try to resolve the issue, by redefining the event horizon. Maybe it's not such an ultimate boundary after all. Perhaps there is an escape route for that information.

It may seem like an esoteric waste of time, pondering such bizarre things as black holes, which have nothing to do with everyday life. In fact, this is an attempt to understand the most fundamental force that affects almost everything we do ... the force of gravity.

Imagine the possibilities if we could control gravity and lift the centre of that trampoline upwards, so you fall away from a massive object rather than towards it. Falling up would certainly make space travel a lot easier.

And since gravity affects both space and time, perhaps we could begin travelling in time. We won't know until we understand how it works.

So, think about that the next time you drop something. The annoying force that pulled your glass to the floor and made it shatter is still a mystery. Don't you think that's astounding in the 21st century?

Nikki J (15)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 5:31 am
Gravity is certainly a force beyond that of which our knowledge barely touches but to use a superlative and say it is "the most far reaching" is not strictly accurate - it is thought to be so but there may well be others too.

Scientists can only prove/disprove things that we have already managed to prove/disprove and so our knowledge of what is, is constantly changing. :)

Kerrie G (118)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 6:35 am
Noted, thanks.

James T (5)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 6:49 am
We've come a long way since Newton tried to determine what made apples fall from trees... hmmm maybe we haven't.

Carmen S (617)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 10:23 am
Very interesting, thanks Michael for sharing this.

Jonathan Harper (0)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 11:54 am

Thomas B (1)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 12:29 pm
Maybe it will get more attention now that there is a Hollywood movie about it.

Jhn Wzt (3)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 12:43 pm
verry intresting story but does it rly "exist"? after all they cant "recreate" it in a lab or see it or touch it :)

Roger G (154)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 2:02 pm
noted, thanks

Birgit W (160)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 2:20 pm
Interesting, thanks.

Debra Tate (17)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 2:51 pm

Arlene C (65)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 2:53 pm
Merci au commentaire de Michael O,

Nelson Baker (0)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 5:01 pm
Thank you for the article.

Jeremy S (3)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 5:30 pm
thank you for shedding light on the, um , gravity, of the situation.

Ahem. Seriously, thank you for the article. This shows that there is much more to learn--and further, that the more we know, the more we discover we have yet to learn. The wisest person is the one who realizes he or she doesn't know as much as he or she thinks...

Frank R (51)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 7:38 pm

Mary Donnelly (47)
Monday February 3, 2014, 2:03 am
Thanks for these ideas.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.