Start A Petition

Leaderless Party Endures Humiliating Week

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: republicans, government, ethics, politics, americans, corruption, dishonesty, propaganda, news, usa, media )

- 1753 days ago -
Republicans' flailing spectacle during the March on Washington anniversary displayed a party with no direction

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Birgit W (160)
Monday September 2, 2013, 3:36 pm
Noted, thanks.

Past Member (0)
Monday September 2, 2013, 5:02 pm

Mary T (358)
Monday September 2, 2013, 5:11 pm
very shameful for the Republican to not attend the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington - thank you again Carrie

Linda Moore (240)
Monday September 2, 2013, 5:25 pm

Very well said, Carrie. The GOP is pathetic and they need to be the minority in all 3 branches of our government !!! Let's work together to make that happen!!!

Mitchell D (87)
Monday September 2, 2013, 6:19 pm
When you've got nothing worthwhile to bring, when all your recent efforts have focused on turning the clock back, when you don't give a damn, maybe it is better to be absent.
Bunch of fools!

Mitchell D (87)
Monday September 2, 2013, 6:24 pm
Thank you, Carrie.
After the anger, I'm left with "How sad is that?"

Jason S (50)
Monday September 2, 2013, 7:20 pm
There only Washington to made money and be useless, Good posting, thanks

Lois Jordan (63)
Monday September 2, 2013, 7:20 pm
So, I guess the next "sound" we hear will be the Republican party imploding. Now, if only the networks and cable news channels could get it right reporting on it. Talk about a dying dinosaur!

Joanne D (38)
Monday September 2, 2013, 7:23 pm
And yet they are already twisting the truth to claim that they were "not invited." How bent is that?

Gloria picchetti (304)
Monday September 2, 2013, 8:58 pm

Katie & Bill D (107)
Monday September 2, 2013, 9:23 pm
looks as if the Repubs have made History Again being disrespectful! Are we Surprised???
Thank You

Jonathan Harper (0)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 4:27 am

Alexandra Rodda (180)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 6:14 am
Shameless lot, those Republicans!

Lona G (79)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 9:24 am
Yup, cracks are appearing on every side now, and people are starting to notice. Good.

Jason R (67)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 11:21 am
Isn't white supremacy a direction?

Agree. A party that tries every 2 years, for the last few decades, to reinvent themselves from something every one knows they are. Thus, the failure, every 2 years
TY. The new direction? Steal every election possible. Shhhh. don't tell the people. lol

jan b (5)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 12:26 pm
Pitiful bunch they are. They have no scruples....what do they have remaining to look up to Rush Limbaugh or Eva Braun Malkin .

Diane O (194)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 3:49 pm
Laugh OUT Loud! You elected a president who has no leadership skills and now wants to pull a political maneuver to "save face" over his incompetent "red line" comment to Syria....and now you all know that Saddam Hussein's WMD's were mobilized and ended up in Syria because they have used the chemical weapons on their own people......and you are criticizing the republicans? Bill Clinton lodged a few missiles into Sudan and that was a joke.

Obama has already weakened the US to the rest of the world. The Brits "stood down." They know Obama is in the middle of extreme embarrassment and yet you support this community organizer.

I still say that history will be very good to George W. Bush. We know where Saddam MOVED the WMD' Syria. Sweet!!!

Carrie B (306)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 4:11 pm
Wow Diane, you're finally admitting Bush and company lied about the WMD's in Iraq! Sweet!!!

Robert O (12)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 7:53 pm
Aren't they the silliest bunch? Thanks Carrie.

Susanne R (235)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 1:07 am
How do we know that Saddam Hussein's WMD's were mobilized and ended up in Syria? According to Wikipedia, Syria has been producing its own chemical weapons for many years:

"Syria is one of five states that have not signed and seven that have not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention,[5] which prohibits the development, production, stockpiling, transfer, and use of chemical weapons. However, in 1968, Syria acceded to the 1925 Geneva Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases. In the aftermath of the 2003 invasion of Iraq Syria denied that it had chemical weapons,[6] but admitted it possessed such weapons in 2012.[7] The Syrian president had earlier alluded to a chemical weapon capability in public statements, in 1990 and 1997.[8]

Western non-governmental organizations have stated they believe Syria has an active chemical weapons program.[9][10][11][12] The U.S. has stated that the Syria "has had a chemical warfare program since the mid-1980s", In 1988, a U.S. analyst described Syria's CW capability as more advanced than that of Iraq, however, Israel stated in 1989 that Syria had the "potential for chemical warfare, but not more than that".[8]

Syria reportedly manufactures chemical weapons(CW) agents, including mustard blistering agents, and deadly nerve agents like Sarin, Tabun and VX. A 2007 assessment indicated that Syria is capable of producing several hundred tons of chemical weapon agents per year.[13] Syria is believed of having (CW) stockpile of hundreds of tonnes of CW agents.[14][15] Syrian CW stockpile is believed to be deliverable by aerial bombs, surface-to-surface missiles[15][8] and artillery rockets.[15]"

Experts have even identified the locations of their production facilities:

Syrian chemical weapons production facilities have been identified by Western nonproliferation experts at approximately 5 sites, plus one suspected weapons base:[16]

al-Safira (Scud missile base)
Hama (Scud missile base)
I was watching the news when former President Bush was being interviewed about the situation in Syria during a golf game earlier this week. He offered two sentences on the subject. One of them was that he was not a fan of Assad and that Assad is capable of mischief.

If history is going to be good to GWB, historians are going to have to look long and hard for any actions or quotations to justify placing him on any kind of pedestal. There are many who believe he's guilty of treason. And with good reason...

Jason R (67)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 9:50 am
Why ask Diane about anything she knows nothing about?
The only thing fox does is make people look like fools. Now our fox watching congRess has joined that group.

Jason R (67)
Saturday September 7, 2013, 2:01 pm
They couldn't keep on enduring if the media was open and free. That is one of their biggest direct violations of the Constitution. This is why they made up, the liberal media. There is NO organization know as the liberal media. Think of us as truthers. eta: people that know what a lie looks like.

"Freedom of the press in the United States is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. This clause is generally understood as prohibiting the government from interfering with the printing and distribution of information or opinions, although freedom of the press, like freedom of speech, is subject to some restrictions, such as defamation law and copyright law."

We have one bRanch of government, in control of 92% of our media!

Diane O (194)
Sunday September 8, 2013, 4:47 am
Jason, all you are doing is speculating.....

The left wing media has been in the tank for Obama since 2007. Now they have to print the truth because there's nowhere to hide anymore.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.