Alert: Planned Site Outage Tonight: Tue. July 28th, 9pm-Midnight PST
my care2
make a difference

causes & news

election '08

your guide to the issues that matter

Care2 Causes Daily Newsletter

see all newsletters

Take action

Protect Medicare From Republican Opposition
act now
America's's seniors need Medicare -- and we need you to declare your support for this important program!
signatures  
End Genocide in Darfur Through Multilateralism » 3,310
Establish Presidential War Powers Commission » 3,004
Demand the Public Option! » 10,425

Care2 political polls

Should the Patriot Act be repealed?

865 votes

Worse Financial Crisis Since 1930's - Can McCain & The Republicans Fix It?

How can McCain claim to be for more regulation to fix the economy, when for his entire career he has supported deregulation? How bad will this financial crisis get? Who can fix it?



From Yahoo Finance

The financial crisis that began 13 months ago has entered a new, far more serious phase.Lingering hopes that the damage could be contained to a handful of financial institutions that made bad bets on mortgages have evaporated. New fault lines are emerging beyond the original problem -- troubled subprime mortgages -- in areas like credit-default swaps, the credit insurance contracts sold by American International Group Inc. and others firms. There's also a growing sense of wariness about the health of trading partners.


From The Huffington Post...

Don't let them tell you this economic meltdown is a complicated mess. It's not. Our national financial crisis is readily understood by anyone who has seen greed and hypocrisy. But we are now witnessing them on a profound, monumental scale.

Conservative Republicans always want the government to stay out of business and avoid regulation as long as they are making lots of money. When their greed, however, gets them into a fix, they are the first to cry out for rules and laws and taxpayer money to bail out their businesses. Obviously, Republicans are socialists. The Bush administration has decided to socialize the debt of the big Wall Street Firms. Taxpayers didn't get to enjoy any of the big money profits on the phony financial instruments like derivatives or bundled sub-prime paper, but we get the privilege of paying for their debt and failures.

Let's just consider the money. The public bailout of insurance giant (becoming a dwarf) AIG is estimated at $85 billion. According to one report, that's more than the Bush administration spent on Aid to Families with Dependent Children during his entire time in office. That amount of money would also pay for health care for every man, woman, and child in America for at least six months.


From Financial Clippings...

The (newly designed and very nice looking) Wall Street Journal website has a great article about the current financial problems. This is not a discussion of how we got here, but more specifically of why it is hard to correct the problems. The key is an orderly de-leveraging of financial firms. Firms have to unwind their debt and build up capital. Unfortunately, as they sell assets to reduce positions, the value of these assets decline, worsening their capital position. We're in a sort of death spiral. It is looking more a more likely that more government intervention will be needed to help these firms get out of their debt positions. This obviously brings with it unpleasant questions about who gets bailed out and who doesn't.


From Political Perspectives: Economic Meltdown...

Is there any doubt that we're in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression? Let's review the tally:

Insurance Industry -
  • AIG Bailout (today an 85 billion loan) connected to deregulation of insurance banking as well as the Housing crisis.
Banking Industry -
  • Lehman Brothers (failure)
  • Merrill Lynch
  • Bear Stearns
  • Stock market taking a bit hit (effects everyone's pensions)
Housing Industry
  • 10,000 foreclosures per DAY
  • over 1.2 million forclosures in process (with protection for only 450 thousand people)
  • housing contruction is at a 17 year low
  • Sales fell 6.2 % in August
  • Countrywide Financial collapses and is bought out
Auto Industry -
  • The auto industry is requesting a $25 billion bailout as plants close across the country (devasted by the decision to sell gas guzzlers and the advent of $4 a gallon gas).
Energy, Inflation, Unemployment -
  • Crisis level, major blow to economy effecting absolutely every sector with particuar pain being felt in transport and travel industries. Unemployment is rising quickly, partly in response to the other faltering sectors.


From The Wall Street Journal...

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi lashed out at President George W. Bush and Republican presidential candidate John McCain, calling the troubled economy a "man-made disaster" and criticizing the president for not explaining more to the American public.

"This morning at the White House and throughout the presidential campaign one thing is clear: George Bush and John McCain have no credibility when it comes to the economy," Pelosi said at a news conference. "Just the brevity of the president's statement. We wondered if he was ever going to come out of hiding on this subject. He came out for one minute and said very little."

Pelosi said Bush should have explained what's going on with the financial crisis and offered an "an apology to the American people for the situation that we are in." She also said both Bush and McCain have "no credibility" when it comes to the economy. "How else could John McCain, in the midst of the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, tell the American people the fundamentals of our economy are strong?"


What do you think about this economic crisis? How much worse can it get? Who can fix it. Let me know what you think in comments.

September 18, 2008 -- Posted by Catherine Morgan
25 Comments   add a comment >>
Donna K.
Tuesday September 23, 2008, 7:52 AM


Sandra......Did you ever hear of giving home loans to people who don't
have jobs/work and don't have to put any money down? This is what the democratic congress wanted and allowed to happen. They wanted everyone to have a chance to get a house.....so now we are in this mess. What happened to "get a job and save up for a house"?

Sharlyn H.
Monday September 22, 2008, 4:24 PM


If our Country would go back to SOUND MONEY, we wouldn't have all of this unsecured debt in the first place! Neither Obama nor McCain can "fix" the US. We need a drastic paradigm shift in the legislature...

sandra s.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 5:25 PM


Donna K, Dems saw this coming in the first place, not McCain. And a good old capitalist wrote in his book "Where Have All the Leaders Gone" some things which hold true now. Guess we haven't learned a thing. It will take someone like Obama who has the b--ls to make the changes we need - and that is what we're talking about.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/iacocca.asp

Donna K.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 4:51 PM


McCain saw this coming 3 years ago....Democratic Congress did want to do anything about it.

Eric G.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 12:26 PM


Of course McCain and the other Republicans can't fix what they broke in the first place - that's going to be President Obama's unenviable task during his first term in office, maybe his second as well.

Eric G.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 12:23 PM


Of course the Republicans (McCain included) can't fix it - they broke it in the first place. President Obama's gonna have his damn work cut out for him!

sandra s.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 11:47 AM


(continued from laast) I am not an economist nor claim to be one, but I do have questions that should be answered:

1. WHO will be buying the eventual sale of these assets? Foreign countries thereby adding to foreign control of America through its debt?
2. Where is this money coming from, ie., how will it SPECIFICALLY affect taxpayers or consumers?
3. Why should greed be rewarded? Those who caused this crisis shouldn't walk out of it wealthy.
4. Will the CEO's walk away with their typical multi-million dollar rewards for failure?
5. Why does Pres. Bush need to have such power over this?

And finally, Paulson is a Republican and failed Republican policies caused this - why should we trust that Paulson, who scrambled to come up with this band-aid quick fix, is keeping his country first? Republicans are afraid that if they don't do this bailout, they will have civil unrest and a national revolution on their hands. Congress should not be strong-armed to accepting a fast track plan that may bite us all in the butt. If Paulson were such a genius, he should have seen this coming...so don't pull the Paulson knows what he is doing gibberish.


sandra s.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 11:46 AM


The more I'm learning about Paulson's plan, the more I'm starting to think this was all planned by Bush and the Republicans as a power grab and the Dems in Congress and the Senate should be very wary about signing on to anything until it has been totally reviewed. After all isn't this how we got into war, by strongarming Congress with alarmist BS?

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=acVoMK3FiuqQ&refer=home

For instance some highlights from the above article concern me:
"The bill would prevent courts from reviewing actions taken under its authority. "
"The Treasury would also have discretion, after discussions with the Fed, to make non-U.S. financial institutions eligible under the program. " - what?
"The plan would raise the ceiling on the national debt and spend as much as the combined annual budgets of the Departments of Defense, Education and Health and Human Services."
" Paulson is asking for the power to hire asset managers and award contracts to private companies." - here we go again with bloated contracts to Bush/McCain's friends no doubt?

More in next post.




Christina W.
Sunday September 21, 2008, 6:03 AM


I have a simple question, well actually two. I've followed with bewilderment all the news surrounding the banking crisis and then the mortgage crisis and the most recent AIG government buyout but someone explain this to me.
First, every single bank that ever wrote a sub-prime loan always required "mortgage insurance". The reason was if the mortgage ever defaulted, the bank would be paid by the mortgage insurance company. The bank even made the loan applicant pay for this insurance. Even if the mortgage defaulted, the bank still got their money. So in other words, the banks did not actually lose any money.
Next, the major mortgage insurance company was AIG, a fact not known by most people. But their insurance was always underwritten or
guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Fannie Mac. If they had to pay out to a bank, they simply went to the guarantor of the loan (Fannie Mae or
Fannie Mac), and they got their money. So in other words, AIG and every single other mortgage insurance company did not actually lose any money.
Next, we now know that Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac were taken over by the government and all loan and mortgage guarantees that were in
default were rescued through the use of public funds. We were told this was needed for the good of the country so I won't debate that here. In other words, Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac did not actually lose any money.
Next, I'm told by the news of loses of billions of dollars all through the financial industry. Yet

Derek Elevier
Saturday September 20, 2008, 11:16 PM


Well, well, it looks like some people are waking up, sic 'em Robert C. Seeing as I wasn't invited to neither parties party (only for big donors). They need not bother me for my paltry one or two dollars. I still say they should only be payed by the state they represent. THey take my money and only listen to their constituents, then let their constituents pay their salary. The only way we are going to see results is when they realize their pay comes only from the people they represent. No more money from lobbiest, special inteerest groups, and PAC. Retirement benefits to be determined by the state they are from. We should require a minimum of twenty years from them before they can retire our military and approximately the same for other state, county, and city civil servants. Why do they get special treatment for themselves. They are the same people who started the outsourcing of US jobs, and made it easy for companies to move overseas. They don't care one damn bit about you, only what they can collect from donors. Pro rate the current reirement to number of years served. Then maybe we the people can bring our lords and masters back down to earth. Maximum vaction time, thirty days like the rest of civil servants, otherwise they lose pay if not performing their jobs. The only way you are going to get some of the rights you feel you deserve is by making your represenatives in Congress and the Senate work for you, otherwise fire their sorry butts. Some members are working for you


Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Compose your comment:

Remaining Characters: 1500

Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved