There is isn't there? Fellow Australian please help me out :S but either way I'm not sure. what will it achieve? I think it'd just make consumers pay more, and companies to use a substitute, which mightn't be better
Well - yes, if one also believes in the other "sin taxes" (e.g.tobacco and alcohol) If those are deterrents, then national health would be improved by a sugar tax, and the budget could SURE use the help. Beats taking Soc Sec from seniors, eh?
Wednesday May 22, 2013, 12:41 AM