START A PETITION34,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
Tell A Friend

Should welfare recipients have to prove they aren't on drugs?

Poll Results: 3,726 votes
I'm not sure.

Read more: Should Welfare Recipients Have To Prove They Aren't On Drugs?

624 Comments   add a comment >>
Dave C.
Saturday June 25, 2016, 11:23 AM

Politicians and corporations should....welfare recipients if the majority says yes I will say okay

Rachel L.
Sunday June 5, 2016, 2:52 PM


Dave C.
Friday April 29, 2016, 5:45 PM


Janis K.
Friday January 22, 2016, 8:16 AM


Natasha Salgado
Wednesday January 20, 2016, 5:05 PM


Jonathan Harper
Monday November 23, 2015, 12:38 AM


Sue H.
Sunday November 22, 2015, 9:11 PM


Roro l.
Saturday November 7, 2015, 4:22 AM


Magdalena C.
Tuesday October 20, 2015, 3:07 AM

Thank you!

M.N. J.
Tuesday October 13, 2015, 9:26 PM

It literally isn't worth the costs of the program to find the very rare welfare recipient who is "on drugs."

Arizona spent $1.7 million (one point seven million dollars) in testing to save $3,500 (three thousand five hundred) in total funds they would have paid to those who failed or refused to take the test.

Tennessee's program found that 37 out of 16,017 screened had failed their testing.

In Florida, where the practice was repeatedly challenged in the courts, Republican Gov. Rick Scott announced that he would not submit any further appeals after the law was ruled unconstitutional by two federal courts. In rejecting Florida's claim, the justices for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals found that during the nearly four months the law was in effect, "4,046 applicants submitted to drug testing. Only 108 -- 2.67% -- tested positive for drug use."

In spite of evidence and facts, as usual, people still want to punish and humiliate welfare recipients.

Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Compose your comment:

Remaining Characters: 1500

Should Extinct species be brought back to life? (when science makes this possible)

Suggest a Poll

New to Care2? Start Here.