5 Reasons Nature is Coming Back in New England

Reports about disappearing rainforests and endangered species facing habitat loss have become routine. This post is about forests and wildlife, with a happy twist.

Nature is making a comeback in New England. According to researchers from Harvard University, the region can now boast that it is the most heavily forested in the United States.

80 percent of New England is now covered by woodlands, Colin Nickerson writes in the Boston Globe. Back in the mid-1800s, only 30 to 40 percent of most parts of the region was still forested, the result of logging, farming and leveling by generations of settlers since the time of the Pilgrims.

“The forest recovery is especially breathtaking. New England is a supreme example of forest comeback,” David Foster, director of the Harvard Forest, says in the Boston Globe.

Native species including beavers, moose, bears, gray seals, pileated woodpeckers, hawks and white-tailed deer that had been all but wiped out have reestablished themselves. There are now some 85,000 white-tailed deer in Massachusetts; only a few hundred were alive in the state at the start of the 20th century.

While there were no bald eagles in Vermont ten years ago, 14 nesting pairs are now rearing 24 chicks.

There’s a number of reasons for the return of the New England’s woodlands.

1. Demographic Changes

In the 1850s, the population of New England was about 4.8 million. It is now around 14.4 million. Ironically, the urbanization and industrialization of New England after the Civil War resulted in trees taking over, as more and more people left rural areas for towns and cities located on rivers where textile mills and machine tool factories were being established.

2. Taller Trees and More of Them

Fewer people living on farms has resulted in poplar, birch and spruce trees retaking the land and  “march[ing] back to their old ground,’’ as Foster puts it.

Even more, in New England’s suburbs, trees built in the 1950s are flourishing and providing homes for all manner of birds from pileated woodpeckers to songbirds, ravens and hawks. 60 percent of bird species in Massachusetts including red-bellied woodpeckers, willets and ospreys are regarded as “stable.” Wild turkeys, wiped out in Massachusetts in the 1800s, have been successfully reintroduced and can be found even in well-populated areas like Brookline.

3. Breaching Hydroelectric Dams

Across New England, 96 dams have been knocked down. This has meant a a “rejiggering of the power grid” with other generating stations having to increase their electrical output. It has also made it possible for salmon and alewife to again spawn in rivers. One river, the Acushnet River in southeastern Massachusetts, is again flowing with thousands, rather than hundreds, of herring.

4. Cleaner Water

The efforts of environmental activists to clean up the Boston Harbor and prevent pipes from sending raw sewage and industrial toxins into the Connecticut River are indeed “bearing fruit” in the form of restored forests and ecosystems.

5. Making Wildlife Welcome

Erecting wood duck shelters, bluebird houses, osprey perches and other artificial nesting structures has helped at-risk species to recover. Legislation that calls for clean air, bans insecticides and protects wetland has also been key.

Living with nature does require some adjustments for everyone. Suburbanites are finding that bears don’t let fences, doors, etc. get in their way when they’re in search of a meal and that the larger deer population means a greater risk of Lyme disease, which is passed onto humans from ticks. Fishermen find that the renewed population of 15,000-plus gray seals seek out the same fish (cod, haddock) that they do.

But as John Gobeille, a Vermont wildlife biologist comments, humans seem to be “doing a better job of living with nature. Maybe it’s because we got so far away [from nature], most of us truly appreciate seeing it back.’’

“It feels almost like we’re entering an age of miracles… New England is undoing many excesses of the industrial age’’ says John Banks, director of natural resources for the Penobscot Nation, a tribe in Maine who fought to breach dams that had been blocking breeding grounds of migratory fish.

New England’s forests still face their share of threats, from climate change to rivers polluted by fertilizer runoff.  But nature, as the revived woodlands and wetlands in the region reveal, can stage a “second act.” How can we make the same happen elsewhere?

Photos from Thinkstock


Carrie-Anne Brown

thanks for sharing :)

Kate S.
Kate S4 years ago

I live in NE and David B, we still have guns.You should look up MA gun laws...by far they are the toughest in the country and anyone who is a responsible gun owner that I know,who does hunt, would NEVER jeopardize their license and illegally harvest an animal. Just because someone has a gun does not mean they slaughter animals silly. Basically there are a lot of wild animals that are making their way through the regions, but they are also being pushed from their natural environments unfortunately too. AS much woods as there are in NE there is urban sprawl and greed that disrupts wildlife.

Donna Ferguson
Donna F4 years ago

this post is very encouraging. thank you!

Jonathan Y.
Jonathan Y4 years ago

New angle, great!

Richard Hancock
Richard Hancock4 years ago

Great news!

Allison C.
Allison C4 years ago

not sure about the actual facts of this, but if its true it makes my heart happy!

Lynnl C.
Lynn C4 years ago


Beverly S.
Beverly S4 years ago

hMM. I'm surpised. A recent study on the Long Island Sound found:

The loss in forested area from 1985 to 2006 in Connecticut alone (184.3 square miles) is more than the areas of Greenwich, Stamford, Darien, New Canaan, Norwalk, and Wilton combined.

I think the loss of habitat has forced most creatures to move nearer to humans, so it seems they're making a comeback. It rarely has a good outcome for the animal, be it a bear (shot), a moose, or a Michigan cougar (killed by carS)

Shirley S.
Shirley S4 years ago

New England must be a HAVEN for wild life.

Monica D.
Monica D4 years ago

This is some good news. It may be however that the consumption of the people in the cities might be driving deforestation in other parts of the world.