Lithuania’s Gay Pride Gets a Boost as Baltic Pride 2010 March is Reinstated

Lithuania’s Supreme Administrative Court has ruled that the first pride march to be held in Lithuania’s capital, Vilnius, must be allowed to go ahead, overruling a lower court decision made earlier in the week that suspended the event’s license.

Gay rights activists accused Lithuania’s officials – particularly the interim Attorney General who petitioned for the suspension – of using supposed public security concerns to mask their homophobia, with advocates of the march saying that law enforcement officials around the capital have repeatedly said that they have adequate manpower to ensure the safety of those that attend. 

On Friday, the Supreme Administrative Court for Lithuania ruled that, in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights, the State must ensure that the public are allowed to exercise a right to peaceful freedom of assembly and that the duty of State officials to guarantee that right for all must be adhered to. This, the court stressed, includes minorities who may hold or represent “unpopular” ideologies.

The court also said that negative consequences of such freedoms, for instance the rumored threats of violence against the marchers, was not grounds enough to prevent the march when “the freedom of remedies is applicable only after the expected date of the meeting” referring to the fact that the lower court that had temporarily suspended the license for the march would only have heard the case after the pride event’s scheduled date, effectively canceling the event and therein rendering the later decision superfluous.

Here’s some background on the events leading up to this decision from an AP report released on Wednesday:

A court in the capital, Vilnius, suspended a permit for Lithuania’s first gay parade after the country’s acting prosecutor general Raimondas Petrauskas said he had evidence “that members of hardline, violent groups are planning to protest and organise various provocative acts”.

Organisers of the event and human rights activists said the ban amounted to discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans-gender (LGBT) people in mostly Catholic and morally conservative Lithuania, and the country’s president quickly condemned the court decision.

“What’s most astonishing is the fact that the police say they are ready to provide security, while the chief prosecutor sees a risk,” said Linas Balsys, a spokesman for President Dalia Grybauskaite.

“The bodies responsible for public order, above all the police, have an obligation to ensure a situation remains calm and there are no clashes. There’s a constitutional right to peaceful assembly. If groups of citizens or organisations aren’t illegal, they have a right to express their views,” he added.

As such, Baltic Pride organizers filed a complaint alleging that the Attorney General was trying to exert illegal pressure so as to prevent LGBTs from exercising their legal right to peaceful association.

Amnesty International also heavily criticized the Attorney General’s stance, saying in a press release:

“The authorities in Lithuania must ensure that the march goes ahead unobstructed and safely as they are obliged under international law to guarantee the rights to freedom of expression and assembly. Anything less will amount to discrimination,” said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty International’s expert on discrimination in Europe.

“The Attorney General’s application is an abuse of the legal process and will result in the violation of human rights.” …

Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite said on Wednesday that if groups or organizations are not banned by law, they have the right to express their opinion as guaranteed by the Constitution of the country.

As noted above, the Attorney General’s call to block the parade comes despite the police saying that they have enough manpower to ensure security, with approximately 800 officers having been assigned ahead of time to police the event. The event is expected to draw around 300 marchers.

Approved in January, the parade was seen as a step forward by human rights activists. In previous years other such parades had been prevented from going ahead, again over security concerns.

In 2007 an EU sponsored parade for tolerance of minorities (not specifically for LGBTs although they were obviously included) was prevented from taking place when authorities cited that anti-gay protesters may become violent.

This time, however, International LGBT rights groups hoped that it was not too late to have the court’s decision reversed and requested that the Supreme Administrative Court should overturn what amounted to a ban on the march.

Referring to today’s decision, ILGA-Europe issued this statement:

Representatives of lesbian, gay, bisexuals, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) organisations from various EU member states, who currently meet in Vilnius for ILGA-Europe’s EU Network, wholeheartedly welcome the decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Administrative Court to uphold the permission by the Vilnius Mayor for the Baltic Pride March for Equality to go ahead tomorrow as originally planned.

ILGA-Europe and its member organisations regard this decision as a triumph of the rule of law and democratic values in Lithuania. Lithuania was the last EU member state whose authorities were trying to prevent LGBTI people from their constitutional right to peaceful assembly. Today’s decision confirms that Lithuania also fully respects its international human rights obligation.

We look forward to the very first LGBT March for Equality which will take place tomorrow in Vilnius and congratulate the organizers of the March – the Lithuanian Gay League, the Tolerant Youth Association and their Baltic partners, Latvian Alliance of LGBT People and Their Friends Mozaika and the Estonian Gay Youth organization – for this important victory.

We hope that tomorrow’s March for Equality will be supported by the Lithuanian people. We call on those may be planning any counter demonstrations to respect the decision of the court, to demonstrate maturity and understanding and to refrain from any obstructive activities. We trust the Lithuanian police will do their job professionally and ensure the security and safety of all participants.

Friday’s court ruling to let the pride event go ahead will be a significant boost to LGBTs in the region. It comes after a recent censorship law came into effect that, although targeting a number of categories of information, has a specific focus on materials that could be considered to be “promoting” homosexuality.

While the President previously vetoed the law, called the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effect of Public Information, Lithuania’s Legislature forced the measure through with even more stringent anti-gay clauses attached, saying that it was necessary in order to protect the “mental well-being” and “intellectual or moral development” of the country’s young people.

Those opposed to Saturday’s pride march had attempted to advance the notion that the march would violate this law, perhaps demonstrating how overreaching and worrying the legislation is. For more information on the law, please click here.

Saturday’s march is part of a wider Baltic Pride 2010 celebration that aims to cover a broad range of topics, including seminars on diversity in education, the showcasing of LGBT inclusive films, as well as an international conference on “Human Rights Combating Fear and Prejudice,” an event that now seems rather timely given the circumstances.

Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to lighttripper.


Mervi R.
Mervi R8 years ago

Thanks for the info!

pam w.
pam w8 years ago

You state tenets and opinions of your religion...they are NOT facts! Annmarie is NOT "an idiot" and YOU are hardly an example of Christian "love."

CollieGirl cg
CollieGirl cg8 years ago

Hate? I stated facts, not hate. Get a grip. Oh and Annmarie that sent me a personal message, you proved without a doubt that you are an idiot. It is in every article "life-style" and do not give me that crap that you have no choice. You do. Carla - there is only ONE God and it is God that judges and condemns, not me. Kris, you obviously do not know the bible. Homosexuality and Bestiality is an abhorant sin and severely judged by God.
The "choice" you have is to accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Saviour who can and will redeem you from this sin. God loves you, it is the sin that he hate's. That is not religion - that is relationship.
I won't be back to read your judgemental and condemning remarks, just because you do not want to hear the truth.

Kathy Javens
Kathy Javens8 years ago

taking that small step will,hopefully lead to more. good for lithuania.

pam w.
pam w8 years ago

Collie Girl and Edmundas represent the loving Christians who follow Jesus when he said something about "judge not, lest ye be judged."

GOOD for the Lithuanians! I hope hateful bigots don't cause trouble for those marching. If it weren't so far away, this straight granny would march with them in body, if not in spirit.

Karlyn R.
Karlyn R8 years ago

CollieGirl- What's with all the hate? Aren't religious folks such as yourself supposed to be compassionate and caring?

Edmundas L.
Edmundas L.8 years ago

So I' m a lithuanian and I can say just this- gays are the freaks of the world! They were allowed to march just becouse they begged EU for help and our country's politicians were too scared to face the EU. By the way all gays who marched in this parade were like animals in a zoo becouse politicians were scared of my country's people. And in conclucion I can say just this that gays parade reached only the more public hatred degrees, becouse thay shown themself in public.

Edward Craig
Edward Craig8 years ago

About time governments noticed there are too many people and we need to discourage motherhood.

Kris J.
Kristina J8 years ago

Hey Collie, its been a while since I read or believed in fairy tales, could you remind me again which commandment it was that said to hate your neighbor if they are not heterosexual. Or was it a disclaimer attached to the 'love your neighbor' commandment? Did they even have disclaimers back in the olden days of Moses, you know, when everyone thought the earth was flat, the sun revolved around us, and believed that the only explanation for illness or natural disaster was the work of some divine force. You know, back before science, when we were still a very primitive species. I'm just wondering if a group of people that were overwhelming illiterate and uneducated had come up with the idea of attaching disclaimers and fine print to things like commandments. And how exactly is a consenting relationship between two literate and educated people the same as a human raping an animal?

Timothy S.
Timothy S8 years ago

Good News for them. Making those first steps forward!