Coal Ash Dumps Across the Nation Are Looking to Expand


Written by Holly Haworth

In the unincorporated community of Claxton, Tennessee sits a two-story log cabin built in the 1790s. The cabin, the county’s oldest building, was built by a Revolutionary War veteran named David Hall. He had fought against England, where the Industrial Revolution was well underway by the 1770s. When Hall got to Tennessee, the region was a backwoods territory of the young republic. Hall built his cabin with wide, rough-hewn pine logs. Hall had probably heard of the growing energy source known as coal. But of course he couldn’t know that one day a coal-burning power plant would sit within view of his cabin, or that the utility that owned the plant would want to buy the land to store its growing pile of coal waste.

Last year, the Tennessee Valley Authority proposed just that. It also proposed to buy another 30 properties in the small community so it could store toxic coal ash from the Bull Run Steam Plant. After TVA’s 2008 coal ash spill, the utility committed to converting all of its ash storage to dry instead of wet sludge — the kind that gushed over 400 acres of land between Christmas and New Year’s. The irony is that although dry storage will be safer, it will also require a lot more land. Whether TVA is destroying communities by unintentional spills or by intentional buy-outs, rural Tennessee continues to be ripped apart by the nation’s largest purchaser of coal.

Last month it was reported by The Knoxville News Sentinel that while TVA didn’t force the owners of the historic David Hall cabin to sell out, it did convince 24 families and the owner of a 118-acre horse farm to give up their land for a new coal ash dump.

“It’s just progress, I guess,” said William Banks, a Claxton resident who sold out. But he didn’t sound convinced. The resignation in his voice seemed to ask: Is dumping harmful heavy metals onto farmland really anyone’s idea of progress?

Tennessee isn’t the only state that is losing land to coal waste storage. Even though the coal industry is on the decline as the percentage of coal-fired electricity in the US continues to plummet, the utilities still have a major problem with storing all of the waste they create. The nation’s coal-burning power plants produce 136 million tons of ash every year. So while land is being grabbed at an alarming rate for resource extraction, it’s also being snatched up to store the wastes from burning those resources.

Here’s just a small sampling:

Missouri Sierra Club chapter director John Hickey says that Ameren Electric recently bought up farmland in the Missouri River floodplain so that it can build a 400-acre coal ash landfill next to Labadie, the state’s largest coal plant.

Last year, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company bought property in Colleton County and tried—but failed, due to a community uproar led by the Coastal Conservation League—to build a 1,000-acre landfill to store coal ash near the village of Canadys.

At its plant straddling the border of Pennsylvania and West Virginia, FirstEnergy has bought land and is attempting to expand its Little Blue Run disposal site, one of the largest in the nation. The plant takes up 1,000 acres in Beaver County and burns about 7 million tons of coal every year. It produces 4 million gallons of coal slurry daily.

Prairie State Energy in Illinois is moving forward with plans to open a 740-acre landfill for storing coal ash. A resident there said that the county board has made its decision with “total disregard to the residents of the area.”

A complete list would be much larger. But no matter the location, the story is the roughly the same: coal fired power plants are running out of room for disposing of their coal ash.

Still, there have been small victories for environmentalists and concerned local citizens. In late May, the EPA decided to oppose a wetlands destruction permit from Louisville Gas & Electric. The company had proposed to store almost 1 million tons of ash along the Ohio River, which, according to the EPA, would have damaged as much as 10 miles of streams, 1.1 acres of wetlands, and .27 acres of ponds within the watershed. This was a bold move for the EPA, which has failed to make a final coal ash rule since it promised to do so just after the Tennessee spill.

Back in Tennessee, residents of Claxton are moving out of the homes they’ve sold to TVA. The local newspaper said they are “now resigned to what seems inevitable,” although the majority of the community strongly opposed the expansion in the beginning.

As Big Coal makes its final push to extract and burn every last bit of the energy source that powered the Industrial Revolution, David Hall’s cabin remains. Sitting in a rocking chair on the centuries-old front porch, one can see the smoke stacks of the Bull Run coal plant. The cabin, then, is both pre- and post-industrial, conjuring notions of the Romantic, the hand-built, the rustic, as well as of the ruin of the fossil fuel era, where a lone home will sit among the ashes.

This post was originally published by the Earth Island Journal.


Related Stories:

Big Coal Gets Desperate, Begs Customers to Complain to EPA

Fracking: Coming to a City or Suburb Near You

How to Purchase the Arctic With Only $4 Billion


Photo from appalacian.voices via flickr


Mary K.
M. C5 years ago

Counting down til doomsday... urgh !

Ela V.
Ela V6 years ago

thanks for informing us, it's important to know about this

Susan T.
Susan T6 years ago

So much for "CLEAN COAL"! Think about it. There is also a problem of what state will accept refuse from the nuclear power plants. That's not so clean either, even if the plants are safe!

The Republicans are moving to Mars and leaving the mess to us, so what do they care. Also, the 1%. Think about it.

They said "the West was too big and dangerous to be settled" and look what happened to the illegal Chinese and our Natives!

History repeats, if allowed. Are you the 1%? Is it really possible for you to achieve the 1%? If not you are stuck with the rest of the idiots. US!

Lynda Duke
Lynda Duke6 years ago

SHRINK coal - Shrink Coal -

Expand alternative energy plans!!!!

Harshiita Sharma
Harshita Sharma6 years ago

Thank you for the article.

Barbara DeFratis
Barbara DeFratis6 years ago

"I agree with Nelson B., the sooner we get rid of coal, nuclear, fossil fuels, etc. and start maximizing the wonderful benefits of renewable energy, the better."Robert O.

You both are so right, count me in agreement too.

Marie W.
Marie W6 years ago

Romney's back yard comes to mind.

Michael C.
Michael C6 years ago

There is something special about the ruling class, 1st they destroy the value of your homes, then they send you job overseas, you lost 40 % of your retirement savings and now they want fill every hole across Amerika with their waste.

Steve R, Are you familiar with what toxins that are contain in coal ash. Alternatives, such as solar and wind are, in fact, cheaper in the long run. With the continued use of coal, we all lose.

Some many years ago, coal played a role, but as it stated in my book about BioDiesel..."An Interim Solution to a Long Term Problem."

Keep in mind that New York City ships garbage across America to Utah, imagine what damage they could do with coal ash.

In a day and age where we put Coke advertisements on our school buses, SCOTUS is allowed to dictated that our youth must study genocide, as in the bible, and I personal favorite, our ever expanding Killer Drone Program.

As for the latter, it seems that Obummer has adopted from the ol' saying, "The enemy of mine enemy is my friend." It now reads, "The friend of my enemies is my Drone target.

Hey, look up, its a drone, just least this time.

Grace Adams
Grace Adams6 years ago

How about separating the very toxic heavy metals portion of coal ash that really needs to be stored safely out of harm's way forever and storing that in a stout bunker of a concrete warehouse at the bottom of an old mined out strip mine coal mine from the less toxic parts that can be safely recycled as part of concrete or other building material and use that part as part of concrete? Kudos to Steve R for also suggesting cement as a possible use for coal ash.

John Mansky
John Mansky6 years ago

Great article,thank you...