Give Alcoholics Beer to Clean Up City Parks?

It’s what you might call fighting fire with fire. The Dutch city of Amsterdam is giving chronic alcoholics beer — five cans a day — in exchange for cleaning up city parks.

This illogical idea is that of the Rainbow Foundation Project, which was created 35 years ago to help heroin addicts; the project also runs three “drug rooms” in Amsterdam where people can go to take the substance. Its program for alcoholics, which is financed by the Dutch state and by donations, recalls incentives programs in which people receive financial rewards — some kind of tangible thing to motivate them — to quit smoking or start breastfeeding.

As Gerrie Holterman, who heads the Rainbow Foundation Project puts it, “Heroin addicts can go to shooting galleries, so why shouldn’t we also give people beer?”

The idea for the program arose because, Holterman explains, a “group of chronic alcoholics was causing a nuisance in Amsterdam’s Oosterpark: fights, noise, disagreeable comments to women.” Thanks to the project, the men now stay occupied, rather than causing “trouble at the park.”

Two groups of about ten alcoholics each work about three days a week. They start their day by going to a garden shed in Amsterdam where they receive two cans of beer and, if they drink it, coffee. Holterman notes their alcohol consumption but “there is an atmosphere of trust: if she gets called away, the alcoholics themselves record how much they have drunk.”

After working in the morning, they receive two more cans of beer at lunch time along with a hot meal. They’re given one more can at 3:30 at the end of their working day as well as a half-packet of rolling tobacco and ten euros.

According to Holterman, “everyone benefits” from this unusual arrangement, as the men are “no longer in the park, they drink less, they eat better and they have something to keep them busy during the day.”

The program isn’t about changing people’s attitudes towards alcohol and its effect on their health and lives; it is not geared towards getting participants to stop drinking but rather takes a pragmatic approach that is typically Dutch, albeit “shocking in other countries.”

Some participants frankly note that, while the program gives their lives “some structure,” they wouldn’t be doing it except for the beer. One 48-year-old-former baker, Vincent, does note that he’s less likely to drink at home after a day of working in the park. Another participant, Frank, who has been arrested for violence, has never worked for anyone and has no fixed residence, acknowledges that “when we leave here, we go to the supermarket and transform the 10 euros we earned into beers.”

The effectiveness of the Rainbow Foundation Project is currently anecdotal. It would be worthwhile to see if such a pragmatic approach is successful over the long-term and if those in the program continue to manage their drinking or eventually will require more support than that offered. For some, could the antidote to alcoholism be not to go “cold turkey” but learn to live — and work — with it?



Anteater Ants
Anteater Ants4 years ago

Why not?

Jenna Brennan
Jennifer B4 years ago

I'd rather have a dirty park than drunken alcoholics stirring up trouble. Alcoholism and violence are much worse problems than parks that can be cleaned up by city workers.

Marianne B.
Marianne B4 years ago

somehow, this made sense to me

Bruno Moreira
Bruno Moreira4 years ago

noted thanks

Lynn C.
Lynn C4 years ago

It's working~!

Danuta Watola
Danuta W4 years ago

Thanks for post.

Susan E G Scott
Susan E G Scott4 years ago

Duly Noted. 'Tis said in some circles, & by some responding here, this is worst possible idea -- but if it works, & keeps otherwise rowdy drunks occupied & outta more trouble yet, it may have its points.

Lukasz Maj
Lukasz Maj4 years ago

this is good idea,if someone says its bad,ok,so go and create something better,or just stop talking without sense

Ron G.
Ron G4 years ago

We need to do this with our Congress. Pay them in alcohol and cocaine and they keep their ACA healthplan. Where they have had to sneak it before, they can blatantly use it after hours. Things could get done on a shorter work day, their monetary paychecks could go to pay the National debt, the substances they are paid with come from drug busts, and their healthplans we pay for are cheaper because of the ACA which could be changed to National Healthcare for all. Quality work from them received? How much worse could it really be? Just kidding....or am I?

Jennifer H.
Jennifer H4 years ago

This idea is wrong on so many levels. It condones the alcoholism and all the hell that comes with it. It is not just the alcoholic that is involved. Families could be trying to dry up the father only to have freebees awaiting for him and the never-ending cycle continues. Just wrong.