How Can the US Convince Clean Energy Companies to Come Here?

Note: This is a guest post from Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew’s Clean Energy Program.

Last year, The Pew Charitable Trusts organized roundtable discussions across the country to gather input from clean energy industry leaders on strategies for enhancing U.S. competitiveness in this key sector of the global economy. Throughout these discussions, we heard from business leaders, investors, and innovators about the importance of eliminating barriers to competition and low-cost capital for clean energy technology development. The Master Limited Partnership Parity Act, or MLP Parity Act, provides an opportunity for U.S. businesses to mobilize private capital and better compete.

Our research indicates that nations with consistent, transparent clean energy policies do better in attracting private investment. This bill, a measure with bipartisan support in both chambers of Congress, is an important step toward providing the U.S. clean energy sector with a steady, long-term policy that can help leverage private capital and provide financial certainty to investors and companies alike. For investors, it will provide the same tax treatment for certain investments in fossil fuels and, for the first time, clean energy.

A master limited partnership is a business structure that has the tax advantages of a partnership, but its ownership equity can be traded as easily as stocks. Raising money from a publicly traded market is generally cheaper than securing private financing. Access to low-cost capital will help spur growth of the clean energy sector, where the costs of building out the infrastructure count for a significant portion of the overall deployment of the clean technologies.

The bill is supported by clean energy businesses, labor and environmental groups, and policy organizations. On April 23, Jack Gerard, the CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, announced his support for MLP parity. This announcement is significant because for three decades, fossil fuel projects have used master limited partnerships to raise capital from smaller investors in public markets, which allows these projects to access broad pools of financing at a low cost. Master limited partnerships have grown into a $370 billion sector, and some clean energy businesses estimate that eligibility could lower project financing costs by up to 50 percent. Perhaps most important, this bill can help level the policy playing field for all energy technologies.

More than 230 unions, private companies, environmental groups, financiers, and other advocates sent a letter to Congress supporting the MLP Parity Act. They write:

All energy industries require private capital to fund projects, and the recent financial market volatility illustrated the value of capital supply afforded by the MLP structure. Furthermore, clean energy projects are attractive assets for MLP investors, featuring stable revenue sources and a good long-term risk profile for investors…. It has worked for traditional energy technologies and would work for clean energy.

The master limited partnership parity legislation is a pragmatic approach to help ensure that U.S. clean energy technologies can compete and succeed. By expanding the master limited partnership list to include solar, wind, geothermal, efficiency, and other clean energy and transmission technologies, renewable energy projects could access low-cost financing, thereby increasing investment and deployment.



Carrie-Anne Brown

thanks for sharing

Sarah Hill
Sarah Hill4 years ago

Our corporate taxes are among the highest in the world, we need to lower them. The unions have salaries very high, It's cheaper for companies to go elsewhere.

Margaret Paddock
M A Paddock4 years ago

Consider that our dollar is not honored in many countries anymore. A U.S. manufacturer has to exchange dollars for Euro's in order to purchase equipment that used to be manufactured here but it is now cheaper to have it done elsewhere because of taxes and regulations.
We have companies here that could do just as well as those in other countries but the costs are prohibitive. Add to that the federal funding giving to unstable companies that went bankrupt and took millions from our economy and you have a disaster for clean energy growth.

It seems the government has it's wires crossed when it speaks of promoting clean energy. We don't need other countries we need our government to clean up it's act(s).

Lydia Weissmuller Price

There's more money to be made from dirty energy than clean...dollars win every time.

Aud Nordby
Aud nordby4 years ago


Sandy Castro
Sandy Castro4 years ago

Important to do so

Juliet Defarge
judith sanders4 years ago

Why do we have to convince others to come here? Find some grad students in environmental science, start a cooperative, and generate clean energy with your own local resources.

Will Rogers
Will Rogers4 years ago

Maybe they won't go because they're scared of that second amendment law. Maybe they would rather live. Than die in some dangerous backwater of this planet where everyone has a gun. Where they'd be forced to have unwanted children and not free to love who they want in the Land Of The Fear. The only reason any company would go there is if they could make more profit there than anywhere else as recompense for having less quality of life.

Patricia H.
Patricia H.4 years ago

thanks for posting

Nils Anders Lunde
PlsNoMessage se4 years ago

Money money money. It is the ONLY thing thats matter on this poor planet, and thats why we are in the shit and will stay there as long as money is first rule. In fact CONTROL is the first rule, the money is only the tool to maintain it!