Is New Mexico on the Verge of Marriage Equality?

Now that one county clerk is issuing same-sex marriage licenses, is New Mexico state on the verge of legalizing marriage equality?

Doña Ana County Clerk Lynn Ellins began issuing same-sex marriage licenses last week based on the fact that New Mexico’s marriage laws are gender neutral and therefore, even without explicit recognition of same-sex couples, would appear to allow for equal marriage rights.

Reports ABC:

Ellins said he had carefully read state laws and concluded the “state’s marriage statutes are gender neutral and do not expressly prohibit Doña Ana County from issuing marriage licenses to same-gender couples.”


Ellins, however, said “any further denial of marriage licenses to these couples violates the United States and New Mexico Constitution and the New Mexico Human Rights Act.”

“I see no reason to make committed couples in Doña Ana County wait another minute to marry,” he added in his statement.

Attorney General Gary King has said he will not challenge Ellins’ move, as he believes that marriage equality bans are unconstitutional. He has also said that he will not move to prohibit other counties from undertaking similar action but he did warn same-sex couples they should be aware that there are several suits that are currently pending before the state supreme court that could invalidate their marriage licenses.

This move technically has its origins dating back as far as 2004, when Sandoval County clerk Victoria Dunlap (a heterosexual Republican) began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples when, after an inquiry on the legality of the matter, she was prompted to examine state law and found no statute prohibited same-sex marriages. She contended that politics aside, she was duty-bound to provide the couples with marriage licenses.

Dunlap was eventually censured by the Republican Party and was slapped with a restraining order (that was never lifted), preventing her from issuing more marriage licenses. However, the validity of those marriages was at least established enough to allow divorce proceedings in at least one case.

More recently in March of this year, Santa Fe Mayor David Coss, together with City Councilor Patti Bushee and City Attorney Geno Zamora, announced that after careful examination of the state’s currents laws, they had determined New Mexico law actually already allows same-sex marriages because of the state’s gender neutral statutes and that a resolution recognizing same-sex marriages could now be brought to a vote.

Santa Fe City Council passed just such a motion in April, and July 20 saw the Santa Fe County Commission approve a similar resolution, saying same-sex couples would be provided marriage licenses.

Attorney General Gary King also refused to block that move but again pleaded for restraint, saying that this matter should be decided by state officials and not local governments.

A number of lawsuits are also making their way toward the state’s supreme court featuring same-sex couples who are demanding the state recognize their rights to equal protection and treatment under the law and allow them to officially marry. In fact, last week saw plaintiffs ask the state supreme court to consolidate their cases, meaning that once the lower courts have ruled, there would be the option of fast tracking toward a state supreme court review. No word yet from the court on that matter.

Also, a same-sex couple from Santa Fe filed an emergency request asking the Second Judicial District Court to allow them to legally marry because one of the women is suffering a rapid decline in health due to what will eventually be a fatal brain tumor. This extends beyond just the right to marry in and of itself, with the couple who have been together for 21 years arguing that the only way they can protect their family during this time, and in particular their three children, is to be able to have the state formally recognize their union.

“I want to know that my family will be protected if I pass away,” Jen Roper, the plaintiff suffering declining health, is quoted as saying. “Angelique and I have been married in our hearts for 21 years and raised three wonderful children together. Because of my illness, we do not have the luxury of waiting years for the courts to decide whether loving, committed same-sex couples can marry in New Mexico. For us, the time is now.”

All of this together seems to be brewing up a perfect storm that, whether through court action or legislators seeing a need to finally resolve this ambiguity in the law, appears set to make New Mexico among the next few states that will recognize the right to marriage equality.

The anti-gay National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is of course furious about this and has issued a rebuke against Doña Ana County and the New Mexico attorney general, admonishing that they are breaking the law by not preventing the issuing of same-sex marriage licenses — when quite clearly they are not for reasons made clear above — and while quietly seeming to forget that less than two months ago, NOM in fact called for all California clerks who believe in so-called traditional marriage to ignore the judgment overturning California’s ban on marriage equality, Proposition 8 and refuse to issue same-sex marriage licenses.

If this, however, is the best that anti-gay marriage forces can muster, all the better for New Mexico and the fight for equality as a whole.

Image credit: Thinkstock.


Danuta Watola
Danuta W4 years ago

Thanks for the information.

Marija Mohoric
Marija M4 years ago

thank you for sharing

Mary L.
Mary L4 years ago

Trolling and you're falling for it. Just let the poor thing stay in the corner. I think that this is a very wise thing that is happening and my respect to Doña Ana County Clerk Lynn Ellins, Sandoval County clerk Victoria Dunlap, and Attorney General Gary King along with Santa Fe Mayor David Coss, together with City Councilor Patti Bushee and City Attorney Geno Zamora for adhering to the law without prejudice.

Bruce K.
Bruce K4 years ago

I live in Dona Ana County we seem to have had an instant increase in population, Good for Biz!

John chapman
John c4 years ago

The tide has turned on this issue, you can fight the tide.

But you can't hold it back.

Barbara L.
Past Member 4 years ago

Judy B., you obviously have not studied science sufficiently or have been taught through family or religion or society that there is something inherently "wrong" with homosexuality. Homosexuality occurs in the animal kingdom; it is not simply within our species. Homosexuality is a matter of biology. Humans have "created" mores against homosexuality that have no bearing on biology.

Prejudice and discrimination, like mores, are a product of societies, not natural science. And homosexuality is as natural as heterosexuality within biology.

Robynne W.
Robynne W4 years ago

Sorry Judy B...but your 'morality' is full of prejudice. Marriage is the uniting of two people who love each other and are committed to each other. Trying to keep someone 'in the closet' is harmful to that person's psyche and to society as a whole. Sadly for you - the screwed up people (you are included in that group) are waning and rational thinking people are on the rise. Good for Lynn Ellins and Victoria Dunlap!

Anne Moran
Anne M4 years ago


Karen and  Ed O.
Karen and Ed O4 years ago

Judy B.

"...not a man who thinks he is a woman and a women who thinks she is a man..."

Obviously you still don't get it. A gay man does not think he is a woman and a lesbian does not think she is a man. They are human beings who happened to be born with a different way of seeing other people than you or me. That does not make them "screwed up people". That just means that they live their lives their own way and since they are their own lives, how they live them is their own business and none of yours.

"...we are going backwards in thinking..."?

On the contrary, my dear lady, we are going forward. We are gradually making the conscious decision that, one, all people have rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, and, two, if other people want to love, marry and share their lives together, whether they are opposite sex or same sex, they should be allowed to do so in peace and without the interference of others.

Vicki Fellner
Victoria F4 years ago

Judy B- you are the backwards thinking person. Other states, and other countries, have had same sex marriage for several years now and the world has not ended. My oldest son and his partner of 16 years were finally able to marry several years ago in NY and the world did not end. Why should they have to listen to people like you when you have nothing to do with their lives? MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS.