Montana Wants to Hunt Endangered Wolves

Federal officials have denied a request by Montana to hunt gray wolves.

This is the most recent development in a lengthy fight between hunters and ranchers in the Northwest and conservation groups over the gray wolf.

Environmental and conservation groups sued the federal government to return the gray wolf to the endangered species list after it was delisted in some states but not in others. The conservation groups said the inconsistency didn’t make sense.

The groups won the suit and the gray wolf was reinstated as endangered, much to the dismay of many in Montana and Idaho, the two states where it was delisted originally.

Take Action: Help protect wolves!!

Idaho governor “Butch” Otter – who is apparently on a personal crusade to hunt wolves – is in separate negotiations with the federal government to make a wolf hunt happen.

Montana filed a request for a “conservation hunt” of 186 wolves, an oxymoron if I’ve ever heard one. Both Idaho and Montana are trying to exploit what they perceive to be loopholes in the Endangered Species Act.

Ranchers, hunters, and other affiliated groups are arguing that the wolves are a threat to game animals and livestock, which in plain terms means they’re angry wolves are killing and eating elk and cows before humans can kill and eat elk and cows. This line of logic doesn’t do much to convince me.

Gray wolves are still recovering from being nearly hunted to extinction, and if it were up to Montana and Idaho, gray wolves would have been extinct decades ago. These wolves are unfortunately standing between people and their profits. By causing a nuisance to the ranchers, they’ve made themselves a target for eradication.

It now appears that Montana will be negotiating directly with the 13 conservationist groups that brought the suit to reinstate gray wolves as endangered. A settlement between them might be the only way that Montana will get to hunt wolves this winter.

Hunting is a barbaric sport whose advocates place it under the banner of environmentalism and conservation. They seek to hunt wolves ostensibly because the wolves are threatening elk, but they don’t mention that they plan to kill the elk, too.

If we acquiesce to the hunting fanatics in Idaho and Montana, we’ll watch the gray wolf join the the long list of species we’ve hunted out of existence.

TAKE ACTION: Protect wolves from shoot-on-sight “management”! 

Photo: Public Domain
Author: Tracy Brooks

268 comments

Paulo R
Paulo R14 days ago

ty

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo R14 days ago

ty

SEND
Paulo R
Paulo R14 days ago

ty

SEND
Sue Griffiths
SUE Griffiths7 years ago

@Ruth S. You say, God has not forgotten about his creation he has set a time for justice.
Well I for one can't wait for that time to come.

SEND
Sue Griffiths
SUE Griffiths7 years ago

@Collette H. I think you are right about the gene pool in Montana. Although there must be loads of decent, intelligent people from those parts, there also must be a lot of inter- breeding going on, mostly by the people that turn up to the pro hunting meetings.

SEND
Sue Griffiths
SUE Griffiths7 years ago

@ Bob M. Why would you put a bullet through the scull of an animal that wandered onto your property? Why couldn't you just shoo it away so it can carry on its life elsewhere. It would have only been trying to look for food to survive, maybe feed its young. What's wrong with that. If animals wander onto people's property, it's usually because that property was built on land stolen from the wildlife that lived there far longer than greedy humans.

SEND
Sue Griffiths
SUE Griffiths7 years ago

I am against killing, but I would make an exception for these insignificant little specs that call themselves hunters. Nothing would give me more pleasure than to see all hunters and animal abusers rounded up and lined against a wall and shot with a machine gun. Firstly though, they should pay for the rounds of ammunition that will cleanse us of this shite. Why should decent hardworking people pay for the ammo? What a wonderful world we would then have, where all wildlife could roam free, safe in the knowledge that there aren't any arseholes lurking about.

SEND
Diane L.
Diane L7 years ago

Should have also added, I have horses, as I mentioned, dogs and cats. Two of my cats are strictly for rodent control and live outside, and two are "inside" cats. I'm very rural, and there are many predators around here. I do my best to protect my two inside only cats as they like going out and up on the roof, where they'd be "sitting ducks" for owls, which are VERY abundant around here, and I know I've lost at least two cats to probably either owls or coyotes. Now, I love my cats and do what I can to protect them, but I'm not about to go out with a gun and start going after every coyote I hear out there EVERY night, nor start taking pot shots at owls, either. Let's see, there's red-tails and bald eagles as well. Where would it end? So, I keep the "inside" cats inside after dusk and that's the best I can do. The outside ones have the garage and other than that, hopefully they know how to take care of themselves. They obviously are co-existing with at least ONE raccoon and I've seen the little masked bugger in my horse trailer and my dog had it treed a couple of nights ago.

SEND
stella bleu
stella bleu7 years ago

Diane and William: great posts!
Ashley and Danielle: this site is called Care2 for people who actually CARE and want to be part of the solution.
You, on the other hand, seem to be part of the problem and your reasoning has no grounds.

SEND
Diane L.
Diane L7 years ago

(cut off)...........somehow the birds manage to survive as well. BTW, #1 grandson will be 30 next month, as I mentioned. A few months back, he and his wife were walking down my driveway at dusk, and a big black bear came out of the woods and meandered down the driveway, right in front of them. He came back and told me about it and then said, "I thought it was pretty COOL until I realized I had a piece of pizza in my hand!" He's come a long way, LOL!

SEND