New ‘F’ Word Means More Bad News for Bees

Written by Dr. David Suzuki, and reposted with permission from The David Suzuki Foundation.

Have you heard of flupyradifurone? Probably not, unless you work for the federal government agency poised to approve this new pesticide for use in Canada. But take note: This new “F” word is bad news for bees.

Flupyradifurone is an insect-killing systemic pesticide similar to the controversial neonicotinoid, or neonic, family of bee-killing chemicals. When applied to seeds or soil, it’s absorbed by plant roots and travels to leaves, flowers, pollen and nectar, making the plant potentially toxic to insects.

This past summer, the international Task Force on Systemic Pesticides analyzed 800 scientific studies and concluded that systemic pesticides like neonics are harming bees, butterflies, birds and worms and should be phased out globally. The European Union banned three neonics for “crops attractive to bees,” but the European Environment Agency says that’s just a starting point, and recommends regulators look at similar pesticides and take into account potential harmful effects on aquatic invertebrates, birds and other insects. The EEA also found “mounting scientific evidence has been systematically suppressed for many years and early warnings were ignored.”

Inexplicably, Canada’s Pest Management Regulation Agency has yet to respond to the Task Force findings and now wants to approve a new systemic pesticide. What’s especially troubling is that, in its description, the PMRA states flupyradifurone “may pose a risk” to bees, birds, worms, spiders, small mammals and aquatic bugs, and that it doesn’t readily break down in water, air or sunlight and may carry over to the following growing season. When it enters streams, rivers and wetlands, “it may persist for a long time.”

Like neonics, flupyradifurone is a nerve poison, acutely toxic to bees if ingested. As in the past, we don’t fully understand the cumulative effects of the increasing amounts of today’s insecticides, pesticides, fungicides and other chemicals being applied to crops across the country.

Neonicotinoids are showing up more frequently and in higher concentrations than the harmful chemicals they replaced. A study last year found 90 percent of Saskatchewan prairie potholes contained residual neonics in the spring, before farmers planted their fields. Research from the U.S. Midwest found neonics in all 79 samples taken from nine rivers. Similar results have been found in wetlands, streams and rivers in the southwest U.S., Georgia and California.

It’s not even clear whether the widespread use of neonic seed treatments increases agricultural yields. A recent report from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regarding soy crop treatments concluded, “these seed treatments provide little or no overall benefits to soybean production in most situations. Published data indicate that in most cases there is no difference in soybean yield when soybean seed was treated with neonicotinoids versus not receiving any insect control treatment.”

The European Environment Agency also found a 2004 ban on neonicotinoid chemicals by France for sunflower and maize crops hasn’t negatively affected productivity. In fact, yields were higher in 2007 than they’d been in a decade.

You’d think we’d learn from past experience with persistent and bioaccumulative pesticides like DDT and organophosphates, and the more recent research on neonicotinoids. DDT was widely used until Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring drew attention to its negative impacts on ecosystems, wildlife and humans. Many, but not all, organophosphate pesticides have also been pulled from widespread use because we learned their neurotoxic effects posed serious risks to humans and wildlife.

Rather than approving new pesticides that may harm pollinators, birds and other animals, including humans, we need better ways to protect crops. A recent report, “Alternatives to neonicotinoid insecticides for pest control,” published in the journal Environmental Science and Pollution Research, suggests further research and methods including “diversifying crop rotations, altering the timing of planting, tillage and irrigation, using less sensitive crops in infested areas, applying biological control agents,” and other lower-risk alternatives.

We need to stop contaminating the environment with neonics and related systemic pesticides. Approving flupyradifurone would take us in the wrong direction. Canada’s Pest Management Regulation Agency is accepting comments on flupyradifurone approval until Nov. 3. You can submit through the PMRA or David Suzuki Foundation websites.

Putting bees and ecosystem functioning at risk endangers us all. It’s time to find a better way.

Photo credit: Shutterstock

123 comments

Jerome S
Jerome S1 years ago

thanks

SEND
Jerome S
Jerome S1 years ago

thanks

SEND
Jim Ven
Jim Ven1 years ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Jim Ven
Jim Ven1 years ago

thanks for sharing

SEND
Jim Ven
Jim Ven2 years ago

thanks for the article.

SEND
Paulinha Russell
Paulinha Russell4 years ago

Thanks

SEND
Mark Donners
Mark Donner4 years ago

Don't listen to Kyle N. He is a paid company shill supporting the most devastating and catastrophic poisons on earth, worse than an nuclear disaster, and would murder his own children if his masters told him it would help his bottom line. This butterfly logo is the absolute hypocrisy of this guy. Bayer, Monsanto et al are terrorists, they are from the same group who supported gas chambers to kill millions, only this time they are attacking all life, a crime millions of times worse. Forget ISIS, these agribusiness companies make ISIS look like saints.

SEND
Kyle Ness
Kyle Ness4 years ago

This is old news. Bee's have been recovering for a few years now with miticide treatments in the hives and have near record honey production in 2014. Beekeepers have to monitor and keep up with control of the vorroa mites which transmit a virus that kills bee's. That is what what caused colony collapse disorder. If you are so worried about insecticides, you should take a look at the asian soybean aphid, there are years where farmers Must spray to get them under control or lose their crop though some years natural predators can keep them in check. neonics are used as seed treatment in some soybeans, corn seed, have no effect on bee's. Bee's do not visit corn or soybeans.

SEND
Angela Roquemore
Angela Roquemore4 years ago

IDIOTS!

SEND
Dawn W.
Dawnie W4 years ago

Vee S... AND IS THERE HONEY STILL FOR TEA ?
(from “The Old Vicarage Grantchester” by Rupert Brooke 1912 )

What a beautiful poem you posted, enjoyed this ode to our bee friends. Truly inspirational. Our bee friends need all the help possible.

♥(✿◠‿◠✿)♥*♥˚☻Love & Peace☻go with☻you all.☻˚♥*♥(✿◠‿◠✿)♥

SEND