No, a Sex Superbug ‘Worse Than AIDS’ Did Not Just Hit the U.S.

Reports of a drug resistant strain of gonorrhea that were supposedly found in parts of America and could have been “worse than AIDS” are, as it turns out, untrue. Here’s what happened and what you need to know.

Last week, the Associated Press and a number of other news agencies and sites including CNBC ran a story about an antibiotic resistant strain of gonorrhea that one doctor announced could be “worse than AIDS.” Here’s an excerpt from one such story:

“This might be a lot worse than AIDS in the short run because the bacteria is more aggressive and will affect more people quickly,” said Alan Christianson, a doctor of naturopathic medicine.


“Getting gonorrhea from this strain might put someone into septic shock and death in a matter of days,” Christianson said. “This is very dangerous.”

“It’s an emergency situation,” said William Smith, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors. “As time moves on, it’s getting more hazardous.”

The gonorrhea strain in question, HO41, was discovered in Japan two years ago in a 31-year-old female sex worker who had been screened in 2009.

The CNBC report, like AP reports, went on to say, “The bacteria has since been found in Hawaii, California and Norway.”

This story quickly went viral. Except it isn’t true.

Three main drugs are used as front-line treatments against gonorrhea. These are injectable ceftriaxone, to which the Japanese H041 was resistant, along with two other antibiotics, azithromycin or doxycycline.

While any drug-resistant strain is concerning, those found in Hawaii and elsewhere are not the same as that found in Japan in 2009.

In the Hawaii cases, which first emerged in May 2011, the strain was in fact H11S8, which has been found to be resistant to the antibiotic azithromycin. This known problem was and is easily remedied in follow-up by administering a different antibiotic.

Moreover, as state and federal health officials were keen to point out, the strain found in Japan has never been found outside of Japan’s borders.

Nikki Mays, a spokeswoman for the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), confirms that the H041 strain of gonorrhea has not been detected in the United States.

She details:

“Ceftriaxone is the drug the CDC recommends for the first-line treatment of gonorrhea. This strain hasn’t been detected elsewhere, and ceftriaxone resistance has not been detected in the United States.”

In addition to this, Peter Whiticir from the State Department of Health’s STD Prevention Control department, has reportedly clarified:

“There is no multi-drug super resistant superbug yet in Hawaii or the United States. We don’t have the superbug in Hawaii that I repeat again, but I think it does raise people’s consciousness that gonorrhea is out there, there are new strains that are developing and evolving and we need to be aware of that and protect ourselves.”

There is another important falsehood that needs correcting.

The AIDS comparison made by Alan Christianson, a so-called “expert” “naturopath” (an often anti-vaccine and suspect so-called “alternative” medicine) is entirely ill-conceived and greatly muddies what is the true problem by giving a false comparison.

No fatalities in cases of antibiotic resistant gonorrhea have been reported. The idea floated by Christianson that the strain could put sufferers into septic shock has also been rejected because the odds of that happening are incredibly low.

“I disagree with the general comparison,” Dr. Bruce Hirsch, an attending physician in infectious diseases at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y., is quoted as saying. “The rate of complications from gonorrhea in terms of systemic problems is so much lower than the rate of complications from untreated AIDS infection.”

This is an opinion echoed by Dr. Carlos del Rio, chair of the Global Health Department at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health, who is quoted as saying, “At this point in time, AIDS is a fatal infection. There really is no reason to compare it to anything else.”

It is true, however, that experts agree that drug-resistant gonorrhea, like other infections, remains a serious problem, and one that the U.S. may only be a couple of years away from having to tackle.

Drug-resistant “superbugs” that cannot be treated with existing front-line treatments are frequently touted as one of the most taxing problems facing modern medicine because they will force a need for new treatment frameworks that will require a radical departure from medicine’s current practices and a massive amount of monetary investment.

The CDC estimates that in the U.S., there are around 20 million STIs diagnosed every year which results in medical costs of around $16 billion. More than 800,000 of reported STI cases are gonorrhea infections. Most of these present in people between the ages of 15 and 24.

It is vital, then, that the effectiveness of remaining treatments is protected and, in terms of fighting STIs, that sex education rather than failed abstinence-only policy is put in place to stress that a simple way to protect from STIs, and therein negate the need to use antibiotics, is to practice safe-sex using a condom.

If anything good can come from this scare story, then, it is the chance to restate how we must carefully control our antibiotics use because there will soon be a day when current antibiotic treatments will not be enough to fight off infections, and that we must take greater steps in educating the public, especially young people, concerning the wider dangers of unprotected sex.


Related Reading:

Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea Spreading Globally

What If Antibiotics Became Totally Useless?

WHO Chief: The End of Modern Medicine Is Coming

Image credit: Thinkstock.


Annmari Lundin
Annmari Lundin2 years ago

Sometimes it's good to read articles a couple of years after they are published. This is one of those instances.
I apologize for these articles being in Swedish, but I couldn't find any others. There are translation programs available on line, though.
Articles from medical sites.

Kathy Perez
Kathy Johnson4 years ago

loved reading the comments. I learn so much on here

Donna B.
Donna B4 years ago

Sad but true: you don't always get The Truth from the news, right?!?! Thx for the article.

Quanta Kiran
Quanta Kiran4 years ago


Marie W.
Marie W4 years ago

Drug-resistant “superbugs” are quite real.

Mara Comitas
Past Member 4 years ago


Jink Huge
Jink H4 years ago

Sure glad I'm not in the sex trade...

Christine Stewart

I really wish we could get people to use condoms- condoms don't prevent 100% of the spread of STDs, but it would surely cut down on transmission. People think- "It's okay if I get an STD or HIV- there are medications for that"- how freakin' stupid is that? Prevent disease, don't treat it after the fact...

Sandra Streifel
Sandra S4 years ago

Mark K:

Abstinence only education has been shown in well-documented research comparing it to comprehensive, age-appropriate sex education to lead to earlier onset of sexual activity, more unprotected sexual contacts, and more teen pregnancies and STD's. It didn't delay onset of sexual activity, the comprehensive sex education did that better!

Sex is a conscious choice, but our young people have a right to all the facts and skills they need to make safe choices when they make the choices they do when they are out there on their own. Parents and religious communities are the ones who need to provide good, wholesome activities, supervision, and moral leadership for the value judgements--schools can't, and shouldn't, do everything.

Marianne C.
Marianne C4 years ago

I think syphilis comes from sheep. And after that, from lonely shepherds.

A personal friend who works in medical research told me that the "eating primates" story about how AIDS started in humans is pure myth. According to her, AIDS in humans began when medical researchers were looking for a means of growing influenza vaccines that did not involve eggs. If people with allergies to eggs cannot be vaccinated, that leaves a large population vulnerable to infection.

For reasons to lengthy to detail in 1500 characters, they decided to use the kidneys of primates, which were easily obtained in Africa, where the research was done. Medical research always requires a human population to test the resulting product on. When such research is unregulated, the testing, as was often true in the past, was done on a "throw-away" population who existed on the fringes of society, and for whom society had little value. And in Africa, that equaled Gay men.

So the chosen "test population" didn't get the flue that year, but they DID get the AIDS virus, which exists in many other primates but which, for some reason, is deadly only to the human primate.

She also logically pointed out that if eating monkey meat had caused AIDS, the entire population of sub-Saharan Africa would have died from eating monkey meat long ago.

I tend be accept that her story is likely true. We rarely hear about it when medical experiments go horribly wrong. We didn't know that black men in the American So