NYC Adopts Trans-Friendly Marriage Policy

To prevent legal action New York City has adopted a new policy designed to protect trans applicants’ rights when they seek a marriage license.

This reform comes after the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund (TLDEF) filed a legal complaint in October, 2010, on behalf of an opposite-sex couple known as Jane and John, both of whom are transgender.

Even though the couple fulfilled all the criteria for a marriage license, they faced discriminatory treatment when they tried to marry in the Bronx in December, 2009.

At the time they were told by the city clerk that they needed to produce their birth certificates, an ID requirement that is not standard for marriage license applicants in the area and one that seemed solely because of the couples’ gender expression.

More from the TLDEF release

NEW YORK, NY — Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund (TLDEF) today announced that the city of New York has adopted a new policy[.pdf] designed to ensure that transgender people have equal access to marriage licenses. The policy was adopted as part of an agreement to resolve threatened legal action involving a transgender couple. The couple wishes to remain private and we refer to them as Jane and John.

Jane and John are both transgender. They are an opposite-sex couple who have been in a relationship for over a decade. In Dec. 2009, they attempted to marry in the Bronx. They fulfilled all of the requirements for receiving a marriage license in New York City and presented their government-issued photo identification — the only identification required by the City Clerk’s office. Rather than issuing the marriage license, the City Clerk refused and instead demanded that Jane and John produce their birth certificates before they could be married — something not required of other marriage license applicants.

Under the terms of the new policy, issued on Feb. 7, 2011, once a marriage license applicant produces the required photo ID, the City Clerk may not request additional proof of sex. Moreover, City Clerk employees are forbidden from considering the applicant’s appearance or preconceived notions related to gender expression when deciding whether to issue a marriage license.

“Transgender people are challenged all the time about their status as men and women,” said TLDEF executive director Michael Silverman. “Our clients are legally entitled to marry and were denied that right just because they are transgender. We applaud the City Clerk’s office for adopting this policy and for taking steps to ensure that this does not happen again.”

In addition to the adoption of the new policy, the agreement to resolve the couple’s claims calls for the City Clerk to apologize to Jane and John, to institute training for all City Clerk employees on issues relating to gender identity and gender expression, and to ensure that Jane and John are free to marry at a time and place of their choosing.

In addition to TLDEF, the legal team on this matter included Carmine Boccuzzi, David Brown and Nathan Horst of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP.

Related Reading:

Transwoman Allegedly Told to Dress like a Man to Improve Chances of Employment

GLAAD Slams Anti-Transgender SNL Skit

Trans Actress Alexandra Billings to LGBT Teens: ‘Stick Around, It Does Get Better’

Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to Jeff Belmonte.


Lynne B.
Lynne Buckley6 years ago

Good news. Well done, New York!

Tracey D.
Tracey D6 years ago

thank you for the article.

Norma V.
Norma Villarreal6 years ago

Documentation could be a problem, and thanks for those who are persistent.

Sound Mind
Ronald E6 years ago

Ehh. Just do away with ALL marriage. Men would be happier.

Lyn Redbird
Lyn henry6 years ago

Thanks for this article.

Pamela K.
Pamela K6 years ago

Yes, Jane and John, congratulations! And kudos for your preseverence in keeping with this! I ask those who maintain that marriage is only between a "man & woman"--for what reason? Childbearing? Do we require male-female "sanctioned marriages" to "produce or try to produce" children? If not then what is the point of excluding other types of sanctioned relationships? If SO--then there are going to be a LOT of pissed off heterosexual couples who have no plans for children out there---Catch 22--I hope so!

Drusilla P.
Drusilla P6 years ago

The clerk clearly abused "its" power (either a twat or a brainless bigot, I bet).
It's nice that something positive was done.
Love is too rare and too precious to have civil servants bugging couples.

Thanks for the info.

melanie b.
melanie blow6 years ago

It sounds like Jane and John were discriminated against, and I'm glad NYC is changing things to be more trans-friendly, but most of my friends and myself have gotten married in New York, and outside the city, it is standard to ask to see your birth certificate. My husband was never issued one, and one of my friends married a man born in Italy, who couldn't get his hands on a copy of his. The government needs to make sure it's not issuing marriage licenses to children, because that way pedophiles would be able to trap their victims forever, but other than that, there really isn't much need for the government to focus on the details of someone's birth.

Alice B.
Alice B6 years ago

About DAMN time!

Valarie S.
Valarie Snell6 years ago

Way to so NYC!