Reevaluating How and Why Women Watch Sports

Written by Danica Ceballos

Amid celebrating the 40th anniversary of Title IX this year and the Olympic Games, a study addressing women’s media consumption of sports has sparked some controversy.

Women (Not) Watching Women: Leisure Time, Television and Implications for Televised Coverage of Women’s Sports,” recently published in the journal Communication, Culture & Critique, centered on the question, “Why, despite exponential growth in sports participation among girls and women, have we not seen a similar rise in women’s sports viewership?”

Researchers Erin Whiteside, an assistant professor at University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and Marie Hardin, an associate professor at Pennsylvania State University, studied 19 heterosexual married women (all white except for one black woman and one Latina, and 15 of them with children) between the ages of 26 and 43 years old. They found that, for women, watching sports was associated with “emotion labor” rather than leisure.

Some of their other findings included:

  • The women watched sports by chance rather than choice, if their personal schedules paralleled the sports’ schedules.
  • The women rarely watched a whole game or event because of conflicts with other responsibilities that took preference.
  • Although they admitted they do not often watch women’s sports, they still think the media should give those sports equal coverage and focus less on the sexual appeal of athletes such as Danica Patrick.

Despite these intriguing findings, media sources such as the Los Angeles Times only reported on one element of the study: “Wives watch sports for husband’s sake,” as the Los Angeles Times’ headline put it. Instead of considering the study as a whole, the article focused on women “using sports as a way to connect with men.”

But a closer look at the study shows that rather than watching a game or event to please their husbands, the women tended to root for their husbands’ favorite teams because it created stronger bonds in the marriage. Says Hardin,

We wanted to talk to women about the ‘how’ and ‘why’ in terms of consumption of media sports. We didn’t want to talk to women who identify as avid sports fans. … People are going to spin it different ways. It’s more complex than you might want to talk about in 200 or 300 words.

The most common and valid critique of the study is the small number of women who were interviewed, but Whiteside admits that the study did not use a random sample to accurately represent all women:

Our goal was not to describe a social trend at a meta-level but to interpret it. We hope that folks will read this and take ideas and pull those threads to approach these issues on a much bigger scale.

Another criticism of the study is the dominance of white women. Hardin explained that because they were working in small focus groups, she wanted racially homogeneous groups because they tend to make subjects feel more comfortable while speaking about their home lives. When cultural norms conflict, Hardin explains, “it changes the way people talk.” She would like to do additional research with women of color, but no studies have been set up yet. She would also like to study women in lesbian households to see if there is a “difference in the power dynamic of the remote control and if household chores are shared.”

In fact, the study was much more about how households operate than whether women watch sports just to please men. Whiteside and Hardin observed that media consumption has a lot to do with relationships in a household, and how factors such as childcare and domestic chores affect women’s leisure time. By focusing on heterosexual married women, they were able to analyze how leisure time and household responsibilities were distributed between men and women spouses.

But the Olympics transcend all other notions about women’s interest in sports. Most of the women in the study explained that while they do not watch much sports media, they were looking forward to watching the Olympics. Whiteside attributes this to the “condensed style of coverage, something they described as easy to follow.” The sports that the women were most interested in watching, however, are often described as “feminine sports”–including gymnastics, tennis and, in the Winter Olympics, figure skating.

This small study is not claiming to represent women as a whole, and a larger, more diverse group of subjects will provide a wider range of tastes and experience. But the study’s much more interesting–and feminist–than one would know by reading the rather sexist take on it from the mainstream media.

This post was originally published by Ms. Magazine.


Related Stories:

Olympic Team Called “Field Hockey Minxes”

Saudi Arabia’s First Female Olympic Athletes Called ‘Prostitutes’

Trans Athlete Breaking Barriers


Photo: Boston Public Library/flickr


Christine Stewart
Christine S5 years ago

I don't watch sports, except an occasional glimpse of gymnastics during the summer olympics!

Gysele van Santen

i LOVE football. every aspect of the game, i love it. my tv channel stays on nfl network or espn, i just like sports, period. nothing wrong with that. the article, Are Sports Just a Distraction, by Kevin Matthews, brought me here.

Danuta Watola
Danuta W5 years ago

Thanks for the share!

Ann Fuller
Ann Fuller5 years ago

I am a 65 year old female. I don't like to watch sport on TV or even listen to boring and the commentators talk so fast. I do however like to watch.....roller & ice skating, ballroom dancing and sincrinize swimming at the Olympic's (if on at a time when I am awake (live in Oz) ). Doesn't matter what sex or age you are it's got nothing to do with your likes & dislikes,
this seems kind of sexist if you ask me.

Anna Undebeck
Anna Undebeck5 years ago

Thanks for posting!

Linda McKellar
Past Member 5 years ago

Sports on TV are BORING. What is exciting about a bunch of 7ft 6 guys hanging off a little round net like a bunch of simians in the jungle? Then they run to the other end & do the same. They're so tall it isn't rocket science to drop the ball through the hoop except for the hot dogging. Baseball: Scratch balls, spit &, if they manage a hit, run in a square. Woohoo! Hockey: at least they have to be good at skating, shooting & of course, fighting. Football: do something then stand around til they do something else. Car racing: Whoop de do. Drive in circles & people hope they crash. Tennis: At least that requires skill. Golf: hit the ball & then walk or drive after it. YAWN! Playing some sports is fun but watching is dull, dull, dull! Some Olympic sports are exciting like cycling & gymnastics, real skill & sudden death results. I would love to see a chunky baseball or a basketball player do some of those sports. I think men watch because they live vicariously via overpaid "athletes" & have "tribes" that follow the same teams.Gives them a sense of belonging I guess, poor things.Soccer or Oz football, there are tough games!

alex l.
alex l5 years ago

this woman watches hockey because she is a leafs fan. all the rest is sexist claptrap.

Marilyn L.
Marilyn L5 years ago

Obviously these so called researcher had a bias; and they have never been to a WNBA game where the majority of the fans are women but a healthy showing of men also. It just galls me when researcher do unfair studies like this. Why is it that we STILL have people who think when a woman does just about anything, she does it only to find or please a man. Stupid, silly and disguting.

Erika M.
Erika M5 years ago

I like watching pro football, I'm single and it has nothing to do with anything other than I like it. Go Chiefs!!

ii q.
g d c5 years ago