RSPCA Urges Changes to UK’s ‘Flawed’ Dangerous Dogs Act

For a quarter of a century, certain pet dogs have been confiscated and killed in the U.K. only because of how they look. Section One of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 (DDA) bans residents from owning pit bull terriers, Japanese Tosas, Dogo Argentinos and Fila Brasileiros, as well as any crossbreeds that look like pit bulls.

Breed-specific legislation (BSL) such as that included in the DDA is unfair because it punishes well-behaved dogs and responsible owners. Because of its similarity to racism in people, it’s been referred to as “breedism.” BSL has proven to be ineffective in increasing public safety where it’s been enacted in the United States. For these reasons, this legislation is opposed by most major U.S. animal welfare organizations as well as President Obama.

And now, on the 25th anniversary of the DDA, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) has released a report whose conclusions will come as no surprise to anyone opposed to BSL.

The report, titled “Breed Specific Legislation: A Dog’s Dinner,” exposes the “ineffectiveness, flaws and negative impact of the breed-specific law,” according to a press release.

Since the DDA has been enacted, thousands of dogs have been seized and destroyed – over the past two years alone, the RSPCA had to kill 366 only because of their breed — yet dog bites have actually increased. Thirty people have been killed by dogs in the U.K. since 1991, but 21 of those dogs were not banned breeds.

Photo credit: RSPCA

Credit: RSPCA

“The police, the RSPCA and other animal rescue organizations have to deal with the consequences of this flawed law by euthanizing hundreds of dogs because legislation is forcing us to due to the way they look, despite being suitable for rehoming,” Dr. Samantha Gaines, RSPCA dog welfare expert, said in the press release. “Not only is this a huge ethical and welfare issue, it also places significant emotional strain on staff.”

Instead of using government resources to confiscate and kill innocent dogs, the RSPCA report has an excellent suggestion: Put those resources to good use enforcing the section of the DDA that targets owners with dogs — of any breed — that are dangerously out of control.

Based on its findings, the RSPCA is calling for an investigation by the U.K. government into the effectiveness of the DDA, assessing other options to improve human safety and dog welfare, and ultimately repealing the breed-specific part of the legislation.

Three Innocent Dogs Affected by the Unfair DDA

Stella, Marley and Darla are just three of the thousands of dogs that have been taken from their homes only because of their looks. Tens of thousands of Care2 members signed petitions urging these innocent victims to be released and, fortunately, all three dogs are now in loving homes.

Stella: After this pit bull mix was taken away from her owner, she spent over two years in a 3-by-9 foot cage in a Devon and Cornwall Police kennel. Stella was never let out to exercise or play. But she’s now running free: Stella was allowed to be adopted by a kennel worker and now lives on her family’s farm.

Marley: The week before Christmas 2015, this pit bull mix was taken from her family. “Marley is not an aggressive dog and has never shown any sort of aggression,” said her owner, Lauren Stevenson. “She adores my 3-year-old daughter and we are lost without her.” Seven months later, Marley was released and returned to her family.

Darla: Even though Darla has been helping 7-year-old Maddison Armer deal with her autism and ADHD, because she is a pit bull mix, Darla is considered “dangerous” under the DDA and was seized by police. Darla was returned to the Armer family 19 days later.

Photo credit: Chris

109 comments

Ruth C.
Ruth Cabout a year ago

There are no bad dogs only horrible people!

SEND
Jennifer H.
Jennifer Habout a year ago

BSL is BS.

SEND
Marie W.
Marie Wabout a year ago

NO BSL!

SEND
Siyus Copetallus
Siyus Copetallus1 years ago

hank you for sharing.

SEND
Telica R.
Telica R1 years ago

Thank you

SEND
angel l.
Angela L1 years ago

Stupid narrow-mimded people, stupid law!!!! there are so thousands of ugly people, aggressive, stupid, insane and all sorts of varieties people, should we isolate them or segregate them? It is humans who are stupid who made the differences of everything. Rich, poor, ugly, beutiful, smart or stupid, who cares. IT'S LIFE!!!! Nobody wants to be on the negative side, animals don't want to be born as animals, humans don't want to be born ugly or poor!!!! If we all have a choice, what would we choose???!!!! So have some common sense and be compassion to all instead of being blind -sided.

SEND
william Miller
william M1 years ago

Thanks

SEND
Lisa Zarafonetis
Lisa Zarafonetis1 years ago

Thanks for the update. USA needs to follow suit!!!

SEND
Anne Moran
Anne Moran1 years ago

corr,, Change will DO them good...

SEND
Sue H.
Sue H1 years ago

Sure hope that the "changes" are forthcoming.

SEND