The Sunshine State Bans All Computers and Smartphones

How do you solve a problem like illegal gambling? Well you certainly don’t pass a bill that is so poorly worded that it, in effect, could be applied to ban all internet access, computers and most modern electronic equipment. But, it appears, Florida may have done just that.

So says a lawsuit filed this week in Miami-Dade Circuit Court on behalf of Incredible Investments, LLC, owned by Consuelo Zapata.

The cause of this dates back to March when Lt. Gov. Jennifer Carroll (R) — better known for her outrageous “lesbians don’t look like me” comment — was forced to resign from office after accusations of her links to companies using Internet cafes to launder money lost her the support of the presiding Republican administration.

The Florida Legislature, Republican controlled and keen to distance itself from the scandal, swiftly passed a law designed to, in essence, ban slot machines and Internet gambling cafes.

Florida’s 1000 such Internet cafes soon closed. End of the matter, right?

Wrong, or so says lawyers acting on behalf of Incredible Investments. They claim Florida’s lawmakers did such a bad job of defining precisely what it is they wanted to ban they have effectively banned all computers and smartphones and possibly many more electronic devices that could ever be used for gambling.

Why? Because the Florida Legislature defined the ban as applying to any ”system or network of devices” that may be used in a game of chance. Here’s the relevant part of the clause that appears in the senate version of the bill that was signed into law by Governor Rick Scot in April:

[...] the term “slot machine or device” means any machine or device or system or network of devices that is adapted for use in such a way  that, upon activation, which may be achieved by, but is not limited to, the insertion of any piece of money, coin, account number, code, or other object or information, such device or system is directly or indirectly caused to operate or may be operated and if the user, whether by application of skill or by reason of any element of chance or of any other outcome unpredictable by the user [...]

As the law had previously been written, again this can be seen in the senate amended bill, the language included terms like “machine” and “operation”.

The Legislature, in attempting to include electronic and online gambling, struck these, and it is here that the problem seems to have arisen. They failed to account for the fact that “system” and “device” applies to so much more than just gambling machines and online gambling tools but all computers and smartphones.

Now, there are a few caveats in the bill but none of them would appear to adequately define the scope of the ban.

“They rushed to judgment and they took what they saw as a very specific problem and essentially criminalized everything,” Justin Kaplan, who is representing Zapata’s Incredible Investments, is quoted as saying. Plaintiffs contend that the law is in fact so broad that it makes illegal the very computers “[lawmakers] used to draft this legislation.”

Of course Incredible Investments, LLC, has a vested interest in overturning this ban as it ran cafés that were subsequently closed by the law.

It seems more lawsuits are now in the works though, with lawyers even working to have the law strictly enforced so as to raise the ire of larger arcades and businesses so that a slew of challenges will be made.

However Florida House Speaker Will Weatherford, one of the main supporters of the bill, isn’t apologizing and contends this is still a good law.

“I am proud that we shut down the illegal Internet cafes in Florida,” he said. “It’s good policy and I’m only disappointed it took this long to do it.”

So let us spare a thought for our friends in Florida who may be reading this article illicitly. Thank you for running the risk and logging on to Care2.

Image credit: Thinkstock.


Jim Ven
Jim V1 years ago

thanks for the article.

Scott haakon
Scott haakon4 years ago

It goes to show what can happen when oversight is not used.

Marie W.
Marie W4 years ago

Absolutely hilarious- dumb and dumber rule.

Lisa Zilli
Lisa Zilli4 years ago


Andy Walker
Past Member 4 years ago


B Jackson
BJ J4 years ago

All the fancy words with banjos playing in the background. . . . .

Liz Edwards
Joan Edwards4 years ago

Let the idiots who made up this bill be the first to throw their "illicit" computers to the swamps.

Tim C.
Tim C4 years ago


Karen F.
Karen F4 years ago

While some of you are criticizing Florida, as usual, for homing all the stupid people in the country ... has it occurred to even one of you that this bill may have been written exactly as it was meant to be written? A case of "a total control law... let the law stand as it is and use it when you want for what you want." I've seen quite a few laws very much like this "blanket" one come out of Washington over the last 10 years but, what do I know? I live in Florida, after all, so y'all know already that I'm stupid.

Dale O.

Intriguing. After Florida tosses all those illicit computers into the Florida Everglades, what happens next? Will the crocodiles and alligators start using the internet?

No, Ryan G, not valid. Does not compute, Florida may come looking for your computer as well should you visit the sunshine state while on vacation and bring along a laptop.

Jacob R, is always feverishly working in the word ‘Obamacare’ wherever he can. Sigh. Of course, if you believe that computers are such dangerous sources of Wi-Fi radiation and are detrimental to your health, why do you own one?