Attack of the Media Mega-Mergers! Skyprosoft, AT&T-Mobile and More

Another day, another media mega-merger. The latest? Microsoft is buying Skype, the Internet communications company, for $8.5 billion.

So exactly what does the Skyprosoft deal mean for consumers? That’s the eight-point-five billion-dollar question. Public News Service’s Mark Scheerer says the deal could be beneficial if — and this is a big ‘if’ — “Microsoft will more strongly embrace network neutrality and other policies aimed at keeping the Web free.”

Net neutrality is a key component to the merger because, according to the Media Access Project’s Mark Wood, “without an open internet, large and anti-competitive carriers like AT&T and Verizon will have the power to cripple potentially competitive services such as Skype’s that will depend on access to existing networks.”

Should Telecoms Break Up?

AlterNet’s David Rosen and Bruce Kushnick make a case for the break-ups of the telecommunications trust, which provides “overpriced and inferior service, and [is] systematically overcharging the hapless American consumer.”

Citing crusading muckraker Ida Tarbell, who went after the Standard Oil monopoly a century ago, as an inspiration for the project, Rosen and Kushnick argue that the recent spate of mergers and acquisitions has put the telecom industry on a similar course of anti-competitive behavior. The answer, they say, is divestiture, which “will lead to increased competition, lower costs and better service.”

FCC’s Revolving Door Keeps on Spinning

Federal Communications Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker is the latest FCC official to land a cushy job at — you guessed it — a telecommunications company. In June, Baker will be moving to work as Comcast’s senior vice-president for government affairs. As Truthout’s Nadia Prupis notes, Baker advocated strongly in favor of Comcast during the commission’s review of the $30 billion merger with NBC Universal earlier this year.

Specifically, Baker objected to proposed FCC requirements for Comcast-NBC “to maintain fair and competitive operations over the airwaves and online, show a minimum amount of local and children’s programming and make high-speed Internet access available to 2.5 million low-income households.”

Senate Probe Focuses on Mobile Security

Truthout’s Prupis also reports that Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) is leading a Senate probe into privacy issues raised by smart phones and other mobile broadband-enabled devices.

Recent concerns over privacy issues have put companies like Google and Apple — whose officials testified Tuesday in Washington — on the hot seat. As Prupis notes, “Legislators on the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law said that without sufficient privacy measures, mobile devices carry the genuine potential for security breaches.” However, the Senate panel’s intent isn’t to limit innovation, but “create strong consumer protections as mobile technology continues to evolve.”

Post-merger, Comcast Lags on Localism

According to a recent study by Free Press (PDF available here), Comcast-owned Telemundo stations haven’t kept promises made to feature more local news — a key condition of the Comcast-NBC merger. While the study suggests that a poor commitment to localism for Telemundo stations was a pre-existing condition, dating back to NBC Universal’s 2002 purchase of the Spanish-language network, it also found that “Comcast has committed to increasing local news production in only six of the 15 communities served by its Telemundo owned-and-operated stations (O&Os).”

The report also found numerous discrepancies in Comcast’s FCC localism filings, including falsely claiming that advertising constituted local news and failing to include descriptions of programs it claimed were local, making it “difficult for the public and the FCC to determine with any accuracy whether the programming listed actually meets the merger commitment.”

Revisiting Protest Music

What does protest music have to do with media policy? Well, when’s the last time you heard Public Enemy’s “Fight the Power” on the radio?

Protest music has all but disappeared from the commercial music landscape, unless you count Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way.” Yet, in an age of media consolidation and corporate-controlled media, it’s good to remember the music scene wasn’t always so timid. Recently, The Nation asked readers to list their Top Ten Protest Songs. They received an overwhelming response, with more than 3,000 entries, and even more streaming in daily.

As the editors note, “five seminal songs [vied] for consideration for the top slot: Woody Guthrie’s ‘This Land is Your Land,’ Florence Reese’s ‘Which Side Are You On,’ Bob Dylan’s ‘Masters of War’ and ‘Blowin’ in the Wind,’ and Pete Seeger’s ‘Where Have All the Flowers Gone.’”

The first list posted online — more are planned — includes music by Public Enemy, Marvin Gaye, Paul Robeson, John Prine, Anti-Flag, The Jam, Malvina Reynolds, Iris DeMent, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and Claude Joseph Rouget de Lisle.

World Press Freedom Day

“Press freedom is at its lowest level in 12 years,” according to Monika Bauerlein and Clara Jeffery of Mother Jones. In honor of World Press Freedom Day, Bauerlein and Jeffery called attention to the 16 journalists currently held in Libya, as well as the two American journalists still detained in Iran (one of whom is a MoJo reporter).

Inter Press Service created a Facebook page to celebrate WPFD and compile reports on the state of freedom of the press from around the globe. It’s a fascinating list that outlines the dangers reporters face — which sometimes results in self-censorship — as well as the prevalence of censorship of political topics in other countries, especially those engaged in bloody civil conflicts. Here are a few choice stories:

  • As Amantha Perera reports from Sri Lanka, one casualty of that country’s decades-long civil war (which ended in 2009) was journalistic independence. “The media became a part of the military operation … No one was able to report objectively, there was pressure on them from all parties.”
  • In Egypt, Cam McGrath writes, the rebellion which toppled the Mubarak government has brought significant changes for reporters. “Before Feb. 11, we had strict orders not to discuss certain topics, such as the Muslim Brotherhood or (Mubarak’s political opponent) Mohamed El Baradei,” says Ashraf El-Leithy, deputy editor of Middle East News Agency (MENA), Egypt’s official news wire. “Now we have complete freedom to write about anything — without any restriction.”
  • In Mexico City, says Daniela Pastrana, the influence of drug cartels has presented distinct challenges to reporting in a state where corruption and violence are widespread, and journalists, police, and government officials are routinely murdered — resulting in collective efforts, meticulous fact-checking, and an emphasis on obtaining public records.

Ethnic Press Grapples With Media Policy Issues

New York Community Media Alliance’s Jehangir Khattak reports for New America Media that a recent information exchange between journalists and advocates held in Boston at the National Conference for Media Reform in April helped the ethnic press address ways to better cover media policy issues for their audiences.

As Khattak notes, the exchange “addressed steps ethnic and community media can take to increase coverage of media policy issues and how to improve the quality of current reporting. [It] also examined the role of media policy advocates in crafting the best course for effective messaging on these issues and what steps they should take.”

Understanding media policy issues can help close the digital divide, which affects underserved, ethnic and minority communities the most.

This post features the best independent, progressive reporting about media policy by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint.


Related Stories:

Sen. Al Franken, New Tools and Protecting Our Privacy

FCC Commissioner To Join Comcast

Your Favorite Protest Song: Help The Nation Make A List

Two Western Journalists Killed in Libya


Artwork from ssoosay via flickr
Written by Eric Arnold, Media Consortium Blogger


jane richmond
jane richmond7 years ago


Susan T.
Susan T7 years ago

In the 70's we preached antiestablishmentarianism. Got no where, thanks to Reagan prices just kept going up, up, up. No trickle dwon effect then either. OK Now I wonder how we lost the anti-trust bills? I must have missed something along the way?

Richelle R.
Richelle R7 years ago

I don't know what a lot of this means. I don't have cable or a cell guess I may have to give up the internet too. ?

Tom Sullivan
Tom C Sullivan7 years ago

Break them all up. It is all about the money.

Ernie Miller
william Miller7 years ago


Morgan Getham
Morgan Getham7 years ago

With the progress being made by Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, and the other major ISP's in imposing limits on internet service, the Skype acquisition may be a non-event. Skype was a big deal when you could use all the internet you wanted for a fixed monthly fee. Now, if you go over a certain amount of data sent and received, your carrier starts charging you extra. This is designed to keep people from using the internet for telephone or television services, in competition with the REAL telephone or television services offered by the companies which also provide the internet connections.

This anti-competitive move went virtually unnoticed outside of the high-tech circles, where it was widely denounced. But it will mean the end of free voice and video calls around the world over your computer. Now, you'll PAY for those calls, because AT&T and Comcast do NOT want you using their internet services to bypass the telephone service (or TV service) that they are anxious to sell you.

Linda T.
Linda T7 years ago

I'd love to see better oversight on the revolving door syndrome and a 10 yrs waiting period for those seeking those jobs at corperations they previously monitored. We don't have free markets in this country we have monopoly markets.

Lloyd H7 years ago

THOSE WHO DO NOT LEARN FROM THE PAST ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT. Or only the stupid keep trying the exact same thing and expect a different outcome. Well obviously America is stupid, incapable of learning, or more likely as is proven by the FCC Commissioner who promoted the Comcast/NBCU merger and then quit to take a cushy job with Comcast/NBCU, to much of the bureaucracy has, through lax regulation, been bought by Corporations.

Robert B.
Robert B7 years ago

What happened to the anti-trust laws? It is obvious that the FCC is run by people looking for cushy jobs as payment to sell out the public.

Ernest S.
Ernest S.7 years ago

Does anybody remember the first time we broke up a major telecom giant? Remember the old AT&T, a tightly governmentally regulated monopoly with a board of directors who ran the company for the good of the public, not merely major shareholders, that had an excellent service and repair record?

Liberals cheered for that and look what it got us?

Breaking up the telecoms might mean they'd actually have to do something. And it would mean strict governmental oversight and regulations to see to it they remain small and independent.
Investors are some of the laziest people on the face of the Earth. Why run the store went you can have some one else do all the work and still reap all the profits? So after an initial period of small, nominally independent telecoms they'd merge and we'd be back a square one.

Nationalization seems the better choice.