There are Probably Toxins in Your Clothes and How to Make It Stop

NOTE: This is a guest post by Laura Kenyon from Greenpeace International.

You’ve probably never heard of halogenated anilines and perfluorinated chemicals. In addition to being mouthfuls to pronounce, both are toxic chemicals that are harmful to the environment and life, both in water and on land. Some anilines can become carcinogenic, or cancer-causing, and several perfluorinated chemicals are known to be toxic for the reproductive and nervous systems of mammals.


Even though these chemicals might be unfamiliar, there is a chance you are already in a close relationship with them, as they may have been used in the manufacturing of the clothes you are wearing.

These hazardous chemicals were both found in water samples taken in the textile heartland of China, in the coastal Zhejiang Province. That’s where the connection to your clothes comes in. Many popular global fashion labels, including Levi’s, Calvin Klein and GAP, source textiles from the manufacturing facilities in the area where the samples were taken, as shown in the Greenpeace International report “Toxic Threads: Putting Pollution on Parade.” And that means that many of us are wearing toxic fashion.

Even though China has a large and thriving textile industry that supplies both the domestic and the international market with clothes, there is a severe lack of information about the kinds of chemicals being used and released into the environment there. There is also very little information about how the hazardous chemicals used to make our clothes are dealt with. At the moment, China relies heavily on wastewater treatment plants to deal with discharges from textile manufacturing facilities in Zhejiang Province.

While these may be effective for certain kinds of pollution, like sewage or biological waste, toxic chemicals such as many PFCs are especially dangerous because they can survive the treatment system meant to clean the water and pass directly out into the environment. Pollution of water is happening on a massive scale, with almost 70% of Chinese lakes, rivers, waterways and reservoirs affected by some kind of water pollution.

The water samples containing toxic chemicals were taken at the discharge pipe of a wastewater treatment plant being used by factories in a large industrial estate, most of which are textile manufacturing facilities. So we know that these chemicals are entering the environment in discharges from the treatment facility.

The problem is tracking down the culprits.

All industrial facilities in the area put their discharges through the same wastewater treatment plants. When they are all pooled together, it is impossible to know which toxic chemical is coming from what facility. Effectively, they hide in the crowd. And it is easy for suppliers and brands that are buying products from these facilities to plead ignorance when there is no way to connect a particular discharge of a hazardous chemical to an individual facility. But it is no excuse for toxic pollution to continue.

Our clothes don’t need to come with these toxic accessories: hazardous chemicals that enter the environment both as discharges from the manufacturing facilities, but also potentially as residue that is washed out when we clean our clothes at home. There are alternatives, but first the manufacturing facilities, suppliers and fashion brands have to commit to transparency. The real challenge is the complete lack of public information available at the moment.

A change is coming

Just last week – thanks to people power — Zara, the world’s largest fashion retailer, committed to detox its supply chain and products and to eliminate all uses and releases of hazardous chemicals by 2020. What’s more, the brand also committed to publicly disclose pollution data from at least 100 of its suppliers in the Global South, including at least 40 in China, by the end of 2013. This transparency is a real breakthrough in the way clothing is manufactured and is an important step in providing local communities, journalists and officials with the information they need to ensure that local water supplies are not turned into public sewers for industry.

It is also the start of something bigger.

For too long, global brands have been able to hide behind industrial smokescreens and continue to make their products against a backdrop of toxic water pollution. Even labels that have been around for over a century and who make some of the most popular clothing items on the planet have put more effort into revitalizing their brand image in recent years than they have into taking care of the negative impacts their products are having on our environment.

Enough is enough

Around the world, consumers, activists and fashionistas are uniting behind the idea that the clothes we buy should carry a story we can be proud of, not the residues of hazardous chemicals. These people are looking for action from brands, and are taking action themselves. Brands that want to keep their customers therefore need to do more than make a positive statement or write a policy — they need to wear this problem on their sleeves. This means publicly talking about the problem and solutions, publicly disclosing information about exactly what chemicals are being released throughout their supply chains, and becoming active pioneers for toxic-free fashion.

Take action today

Sign on to support Fashion Without Pollution!

Help get our new video “Detox Fashion,” which reveals the toxic truth behind the clothes we buy, on as many screens as possible.

We know these clothing brands monitor social media as closely as they monitor traditional media, and every time you like, share, comment on, or promote this video, it increases the pressure on the companies to change their ways: to stop poisoning rivers in the countries where their products are made, and stop shipping hazardous chemicals all over the world in their clothes.

This past week, we’ve shown the fashion industry what we’re capable of together. Unfortunately, the toxic discharges from clothing factories continue, and while Zara is the biggest, more companies must recognize and act upon the urgency of the situation to detox our water.

Related Stories:

Stop Dooming the Rest of Us, Climate Change Deniers

Only 86 of These Orcas Still Exist, But They Don’t Deserve Our Protection

Irony Alert: American Petroleum Institute Calls For Obama To Aid “Economic Catastrophe” Due To Warming-Fueled Drought

Photo copyright of Greenpeace and Qiu Bo - Photo Title; Life inside a dye factory.


Past Member
Past Member 2 years ago

I got this blog site through my friends and when I searched this really there were informative articles at the place.Bollywood sarees

Michealclark Michealclark
Past Member 3 years ago

I suppose this info is completely unique.
bubblegum casting

Romanoaura Romanoaura
Romanoaura R4 years ago

I'm certainly very happy to read this blog site posts which carries plenty of helpful data, thanks for providing such information.

don wreford
don wreford5 years ago

Don't buy new clothes, i either am given clothes by people who think I am going down hill or I buy the few from op shops,some from ebay, used clothes but very few, I had to train myself a long time to come clean and out of consumption mode to soothe my neurotic impulse, although for a long time I thought people cared in some way about me, I eventually worked out that people do not give a fig that much about me, Man makes clothes and clothes do not make the Man.
Once you get over the illusion of dress up, you can move on.

Peggy L.
Peggy Larvey5 years ago

The problem isn't just China. Consumers share a large part of the responsibility. By always shopping for the cheapest brand, we push manufacturers who in turn push suppliers to deliver what we consumers want. First order of business is CONSUME LESS. And second is BE WILLING TO PAY MORE FOR BRANDS THAT DELIVER CLOTHES MADE WITH UNPOLLUTED CLOTH. That way we can protect our own health and that of everyone in the supply chain, as well as our rivers and streams.

Duane B.
.5 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Christopher M.
Christopher M.5 years ago

Maybe they could simply have wet cleaners who press the clothes for you???

Christopher M.
Christopher M.5 years ago

but people gotta have pressed clothes to go do their thing every day.

Christopher M.
Christopher M.5 years ago

especially your dry cleaning

Tammy D.
Tammy D5 years ago

A warning label on clothes? Oh that is agood joke. We can't even get labeling on things we eat! How about just being better and smarter consumers? Read labels, buy used, buy less. These problems are just as much our fault as consumers. Time to take responsibility for where our money goes.