What Is a Marginal Tax Rate? The Rich Are Misleading You

When new Congressional phenom Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently floated a 70 percent marginal tax rate to help pay for the Green New Deal, the panicked response from Americans exposed an important truth: most people don’t understand how tax rates work, and the wealthy are exploiting that lack of knowledge.


Admittedly, it seems like an alarming suggestion for those of us who don’t get what she’s talking about. It’s easy to assume that she means all of us will be losing 70 percent of our income and if you earn about $40,000, keeping only $12,000 isn’t going to pay for food and rent. However, a 70 percent marginal tax rate would only apply to the richest of the rich.

Still, even if you get that she means that rate would apply only to the wealthy, a lot of people erroneously figure that system is unfair. “If millionaires are taxed at 70 percent, while hundred thousand-aires are taxed less, wouldn’t it be possible for someone who makes a little over a million dollars to end up with less money than someone with a smaller salary?!” Actually, no, because that’s not how marginal tax rates work.


While tax brackets do stipulate that people who make over x dollars get taxed at a higher rate, taxpayers pay the smaller rates along the way. In short, you pay the lowest tax rate for all the money you’ve earned up to the limit of the first bracket, the next highest rate on all the money you’ve earned above the first bracket up to the limit on the second bracket and so on as necessary.

Vox uses 2019’s U.S. tax brackets as an example:


If your family earns the average household income of about $73,000, that means you’d have $9,700 taxed at 10 percent, another $29,775 taxed at 12 percent and the remaining $33,543 taxed at 22 percent.

Importantly, if someone were to get a raise and push the household income just above $84,200, it doesn’t mean suddenly all of the money you earn is taxed at 24 percent, but just that little bit extra above the first $84,200. So NO, you can’t lose more money by earning more.


Not really. Ocasio-Cortez said she backs a percent marginal tax rate instituted for people earning $10 million in a single year, which wouldn’t even apply to most millionaires – we’re talking roughly 1 percent OF the top 1 percent.

At points, the U.S.’s top tax margin has been as high as 90 percent, and it was at the 70 percent mark Ocasio-Cortez endorsed as recently as the 1980s. With our highest tax margin currently at 37 percent, we actually have one of the lowest such rates in American history, so let’s not act like it’s outrageous or economy-crushing to suggest that it return to something fairer.


The rich and powerful are using the semi-complicated nature of marginal tax rates to pull the wool over Americans’ eyes. GOP Minority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise tweeted that Ocasio-Cortez’s proposal would “take away 70% of your income and give it to leftist fantasy programs,” preying upon people’s assumptions that they, too, would be taxed at 70 percent. Additionally, GOP Strategist Grover Norquist ludicrously compared a 70 percent tax rate to slavery.

But unless you’re one of the ~2,000 Americans who make $10 million+ a year, that doesn’t apply to you – and even if it were you, again, that’s 70 percent on everything you make OVER $10 million, you greedy so-and-so.

Let’s not forget that it’s the rich and powerful who wrote these tax laws. Naturally, they wrote them to benefit themselves and they don’t want the lower and middle classes to recognize how much of a raw deal they’re getting. Don’t let them fool you into thinking a much larger marginal tax rate is outrageous, unfeasible or irresponsible.


hELEN habout a month ago


Chad A
Chad A2 months ago

Thank you.

Dr. Jan H
Dr. Jan Hill2 months ago


Clare O'Beara
Clare O'Beara2 months ago

The one percent own more than 50% of all the world's wealth. They do this by buying resources like property and mines and food producing land which make wealth.

Clare O'Beara
Clare O'Beara2 months ago

The rich escape taxes by owning a few homes around the world and spending a few months in each, not enough to be domiciled in that country.

Clare O'Beara
Clare O'Beara2 months ago

If you are making all that much money you may well be hiding billions in Panama. We need the world wide open access for tax to all accounts. The account must declare the beneficial holder and no more than two steps of companies etc should be allowed.

Danuta W
Danuta W2 months ago

Thank you for posting

Paul Carter
Paul Carter2 months ago

There is not really such thing as money, it is a mathematical construct. Even the dollars in your wallet are only a promissory note. Most wealth is held in computer programs. The problem is that few of the 99% have access to that wealth, while for most of the 1% it grows without them having to lift a finger. If someone's expenditure is always less than their income their wealth will increase automatically. If their assets increase in value so does their wealth. The problem is not of limited wealth, it is access to that wealth. We pay insurance to mitigate disasters accepting that many pay in and only a few take out. Usually insurance rates are dependent on risk. Tax should work in the same way with those with the most to lose paying most. Unfortunately those with the most to lose are often able to pay less because they can avoid some if not most of their dues. History shows when the majority of people in a country have disposable income greater than their day to day needs the economy grows (and the rich get richer). When the majority just get by the economy stagnates or even goes in reverse. The rich still get richer for a while but then their wealth gets eroded. A balanced, properly taxed economy benefits everyone.

David F
David F2 months ago

David C, Alea C
The idea exists that there is a limited supply of money in the world. Along with this idea comes cries that we must redistribute these limited resources to create equality.
This train of thought is shortsighted and fails to consider the evidence to the contrary. Wealth can be created, and does not have to be seized and redistributed. If you create an economy of growth more jobs are created along with commodities.

The limited pie fallacy is used by socialist and communists to fuel class warfare. This allows them to under mind the control that the wealthy often exercise. It is a lie fed to the masses to incite a feeling of entitlement. It plays on the greed and fears of people. It feeds them the lie that they will not get enough if they do not seize it violently or through taxation, rather than focusing their energy on producing their own wealth. (From Squidoo)

Alea C
Alea C2 months ago

How can republican supporters not understand they're getting screwed by the rich? As long as republicans are in charge there will be little or no taxes levied against the 1%.