With Midterms Looming, There’s Another Push For a 20 Week Abortion Ban

Spoiler alert: the Senate is not going to pass a 20 week federal ban on abortions. So why, you may wonder, are there 33 Republicans allegedly making a push to get a vote to happen?

Simple. It’s election time.

The 20 week abortion ban has become the go to bill for politicians, who believe that this tiny incremental assault on Roe v. Wade by restricting abortion just a teensy bit before the constitutionally drawn viability line will crack open the door for a further assault on all legal abortion down the road. Backed by medically inaccurate claims and chubby faced fetal ultrasound images as stage props, abortion opponents have equated abortion even prior to viability with child sacrifice and politicians who support the current constitutional standards with baby murderers.

Due to a pro-choice majority, there is absolutely no way that a ban on abortion in any form is going to pass the current Senate, but that hasn’t stopped Republicans from urging action on a vote over and over and over again. Since currently Congress’ favorite sport is obstruction, it’s not surprising that we are are seeing focus yet again move to another bill that has absolutely no chance of passing the chamber, much less ever being signed into law.

With a GOP that has been moved so far to the right, the fact that the body could only get 33 of the 45 members of the caucus to sign onto a letter urging a vote on an abortion ban is a pretty interesting fact. With that in mind, the list of those who signed the letter pushing for a vote on a ban is a fascinating study of who does and doesn’t feel vulnerable heading into the midterms, and who is jockeying for position already when it comes to a potential 2016 presidential run.

Both New Hampshire Senator Kelly Ayotte and South Carolina Governor Lindsay Graham, who are spearheading the letter urging “colleagues” for support, have strong reasons to want to be seen leading the effort. Graham was previously threatened by a number of Tea Party primary challengers, and although that threat is receding, pushing for legislation so dear to groups like the Susan B. Anthony List, who is clamoring for the vote, may help keep him ahead of his even more far right competition. Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, who also has been threatened by a Tea Party primary challenger, has the same impetus to respond to SBA’s plea, and he has done so as well.

Ayotte, like the only other Republican woman to sign the letter, Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer, has no reason to fear this November since she is not up for election. However, getting on the good side of an anti-abortion political action group that nominally embraces female candidates and is also likely to be highly involved once the 2016 presidential election gets underway is a smart move for any female GOP politician with White House aspirations. The two other GOP women senators, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, didn’t sign on.

Then there is the question of those Republicans who didn’t put themselves on the list publicly declaring they wanted a 20 week ban. Do they not want a ban because they feel a 20 week ban is too restrictive, or not restrictive enough? The fact that neither senator from Georgia signed on to the Ayotte/Graham letter may actually be an act of politicians unhappy with any bill that doesn’t make abortions illegal at every stage, an issue that ended up tearing apart the anti-abortion movement in that state just a month earlier.

Whatever reason Republican senators did or did not sign on to publicly support a 20 week abortion ban, the circus will continue regardless. Despite the fact that a bill will never pass the Senate, would be vetoed even if it did, and even if it wasn’t would still officially be unconstitutional, Sen. Lindsey Graham insists that the issue will be pushed soon as their means of marking the one year anniversary of the conviction of Dr. Kermit Gosnell, who performed illegal abortions and is serving time in jail after being found guilty of murder.

Ironically, a 20 week ban would not likely have stopped Gosnell, who was already performing abortions against the law as it were. But when your real goal is to score points for an upcoming election, rather than spend time debating bills that would actually become law, stagecraft and messages are far more important than actual results.

Photo credit: Thinkstock


Jim Ven
Jim Ven10 months ago


Jerome S
Jerome S10 months ago

thanks for sharing.

Jim Ven
Jim Ven1 years ago

thanks for the article.

Janice Thompson
Janice Thompson3 years ago

Politicians will do anything to get into a womb.

ScoTT S.
ScoTT S3 years ago

During sex 499,999,999 sperm must die. Why does no one advocate for their rights?

Fi T.
Past Member 3 years ago

Treasure life

Ashley heffner
Lady Suki3 years ago

I see the Republicans REALLY want that female vote.

Kevin Brown
Kevin Brown3 years ago

It is a woman's body and until the fetus is viable the government (and everybody else) needs to stay the hell OUT!


If you are anti-abortion even for ANY reason whatsoever, as commented on by Martha F. who seems to think that abortion should not be allowed for even rape vicims, I think that that is really not understanding the problem in all it's awfullness! You just cannot make out that all pregancies are the result of carelessness or the woman's fault through being too lazy to take precautions! I would have thought that even pro-life people would at least make a concession for certain abortions to be the right of the woman to perform. Having said that, there is obviously a need for much better education of young people to make sure that these unwanted pregnacies do not occur. The only trouble is, with all the best sex education in the world, with the present trend for young people to drink and take drugs, I am afraid that the lovely ideal of young people always being responsible is just not going to happen. our whole culture is sexualised. it is a world where we have to be more flexible and not make 'one-size fits all' rules as that is just not using our intelligence or being realistic. and in many cases the denial of abortions would be the cause of damaged foetuses and loss of both the lives of the mothers and the fetus through desperate women trying to perform their own abortions. Most women would not normally choose to abort a fetus unless they were pretty desperate!

Robert Hamm
Robert Hamm3 years ago

If only it was that easy Martha Many Men wont wear them.