What You Should Know About Radiation Exposure (Infographic)

The Fukushima explosion is the worst nuclear disaster in Japan since World War II.  This situation comes on the heels of—not one, but two—natural disasters, and in the midst of this crisis, questions undoubtedly arise about health risks.

Between reports that tap water and some food in Japan might already be contaminated with radiation, people are more concerned than ever about exposure.

This timely infographic aggregates numerous sources that are authorities on radiation. It details the threat levels of radiation exposure from events like the Fukushima explosion down to a dental x-ray.

Created by Geary Interactive, a digital marketing agency / Click here for a larger version

Also Check Out:
America’s 10 Most Toxic Cities
America’s 10 Least Toxic Cities
Help Japan’s Animals
Why You Should Not Panic About Radiation From Japan

Image Credit: Flickr – mad_house_photography


Danial W.
Past Member 4 years ago

Thanks for sharing detail information

Jamie Clemons
Jamie Clemons5 years ago

there is no safe level of radiation even background radiation poses risk of increased cancer.

Jamie Clemons
Jamie Clemons5 years ago

There is no safe level of radiation and even background radiation increases your risk of cancer.

Harshiita Sharma
Harshita Sharma5 years ago

Thank You.

J.L. A.
JL A5 years ago

good to know

Gail P.
Gail P6 years ago

There have been dozens of articles on how solar and wind are competitive with coal and way cheaper that nuclear. Even Bloomberg says wind is competitive: http://www.grist.org/article/2011-02-07-report-wind-power-now-competitive-with-coal-in-some-regions.

And as great predictor of economic trends, Paul Krugman, pointed out in his recent op-ed i the NYTs solar is nearly there as well. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/07/opinion/krugman-here-comes-solar-energy.html?_r=3&hp

Danuta Watola
Danuta Watola6 years ago


Matilda H.
Past Member 6 years ago

Scary stuff.

Jerry t.
Jerold t6 years ago

All well and good comments. The biggest nuclear threat won't go away with fussion (if we ever acheive it). Because fission waste is here for a virtual eternity.
We've been very lucky so far. Russia and Japan, not so. Gregg's people on the rez might offer a less glowing appraisal of our energy needs being fullfilled by Uranium.
The American people will tolerate anything that sustains the status quo, so long as it's not in they're backyard.
Extraction sites of Uranium, coal and oil are no longer prime properties. Waste dumping grounds for these toxins are off limits to any life forms.
The real tragedy is that the products manufactured that demand these energies do not dispose well either.
The depletion of food offered by nature requires us to invent new sources of food and supplies for our growing populations.
Technology will never replace nature, no matter what the scifi movies promise.
Man's way leads to destuction.
If we don't turn our attention to maintaining a healthy environment, we are doomed more quickly than we are destined to be in the first place.
We should have never left Eden. But, here we are.

Panthera Leo
Past Member 6 years ago

Right now, we simply aren't scientifically advanced enough to eliminate our need to nuclear, coal, or natural gas fired power plants. Maybe in 25 or 50 years we will be. But right now, we just aren't. Nuclear fusion (as opposed to nuclear fision that we currently use) is the ultimate source of clean safe energy. It produced no radioactive waste, and it uses hydrogen, which is abundant and we will never run out of it. But self-sustaining fusion reactions are proving very elusive right now, so it's not feasible to produce power from it.